Paramesius longior Dodd, 1920: 378
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2014.75 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E02C736E-661D-407F-9322-24BFB95E233E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3863509 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0B6387A7-6C70-FF8E-940C-BB7CBB5E16BD |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Paramesius longior Dodd, 1920: 378 |
status |
|
Paramesius longior Dodd, 1920: 378 .
Valid name
Paramesius longior Dodd, 1920 .
Summary of types
Holotype ♀, BMNH number 9.663, by original designation . Paratype ♂.
Primary type data
Type; Hewitt/ Kuching; J2; P.Cameron Coll./ 1914-110; Brachyaulax / rufipes Cam. ♀ / Type Borneo; Paramesius ♀ / longior Dodd.
Type locality
Malaysia, Borneo, Sarawak, Kuching.
Remarks
This species was described from a specimen of each sex which had been labelled with the manuscript name “ Brachyaulax rufipes ” by Cameron. One female and four males were found labelled “ B. rufipes ” in Cameron’s hand. Of these two of the males were mounted together; these could not have been seen by Dodd as he only mentioned one male. A third male is labelled as a type but is not, as the antennae are the wrong colour. The female and remaining male are the types. The female is labelled “type” and the male “cotype”, following Dodd’s published, designation so the female is the holotype by original designation. The holotype is mounted on a card, and has its wings torn and partly missing.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Paramesius longior Dodd, 1920: 378
Notton, David G. 2014 |
Paramesius longior
Dodd A. P. 1920: 378 |