Spiroplasma
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1051/parasite/2023064 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13890139 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0B4D879B-A174-6249-FFB9-F8A8FEAB4886 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Spiroplasma |
status |
|
Co-infection and the density of Spiroplasma View in CoL , Trypanosoma View in CoL , and Wigglesworthia
The density of Spiroplasma , Trypanosoma , and Wigglesworthia was evaluated using relative qPCR based on the single (Sp + / T —; Sp — / T +) and double co-infection (Sp + / T +) status. As expected, the results showed that flies infected with Spiroplasma (Sp + / T — and Sp + / T +) had a significantly higher density of Spiroplasma compared to those not infected (Sp — / T +), which indicated that flies classified as uninfected by conventional PCR showed lower infection rates with qPCR. However, there was no significant difference in the density of Spiroplasma between flies infected with Spiroplasma and not infected with Trypanosoma (Sp + / T —) and those infected with both (Sp + / T +) ( Fig. 5A View Figure 5 ). Furthermore, flies with double co-infection (Sp + / T +) had a significantly higher density of trypanosomes than those with single co-infection (Sp + / T — and Sp — / T +) ( Fig. 5B View Figure 5 ). However, no significant difference was found in the density of Wigglesworthia in the three categories of co-infection ( Fig. 5C View Figure 5 ).
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |