Spiroplasma

Moyaba, Percy, Ouedraogo, Gisele Ms, Pagabeleguem, Soumaïla, Njokou, Flobert, Freitas, Ngambia, Vreysen, Marc Jb & Abd-Alla, Adly Mm, 2023, Prevalence of Spiroplasma and interaction with wild Glossina tachinoides microbiota, Parasite (Paris, France) 30 (62), pp. 1-14 : 7

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1051/parasite/2023064

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13890139

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0B4D879B-A174-6249-FFB9-F8A8FEAB4886

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Spiroplasma
status

 

Co-infection and the density of Spiroplasma View in CoL , Trypanosoma View in CoL , and Wigglesworthia

The density of Spiroplasma , Trypanosoma , and Wigglesworthia was evaluated using relative qPCR based on the single (Sp + / T —; Sp — / T +) and double co-infection (Sp + / T +) status. As expected, the results showed that flies infected with Spiroplasma (Sp + / T — and Sp + / T +) had a significantly higher density of Spiroplasma compared to those not infected (Sp — / T +), which indicated that flies classified as uninfected by conventional PCR showed lower infection rates with qPCR. However, there was no significant difference in the density of Spiroplasma between flies infected with Spiroplasma and not infected with Trypanosoma (Sp + / T —) and those infected with both (Sp + / T +) ( Fig. 5A View Figure 5 ). Furthermore, flies with double co-infection (Sp + / T +) had a significantly higher density of trypanosomes than those with single co-infection (Sp + / T — and Sp — / T +) ( Fig. 5B View Figure 5 ). However, no significant difference was found in the density of Wigglesworthia in the three categories of co-infection ( Fig. 5C View Figure 5 ).

T

Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF