Theratta eravikulam, Anilkumar & Wesener & Moritz, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5182.5.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E70EB74A-DC7E-482D-AE4D-D58FB3CD4F5A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7059567 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0A3287A5-B901-E814-6DC1-FC58FC715AEE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Theratta eravikulam |
status |
sp. nov. |
Theratta eravikulam View in CoL n. sp. Anilkumar, Wesener & Moritz
Figs 7–9 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE9
Diagnosis. Dark purple in color ( Figs 7A, B View FIGURE 7 ), while T. mannavan n. sp. ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ) and T. shola n. sp. are light purple. More than 50 segments ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ). T. eravikulam n. sp. differs from T. mannavan n. sp. by a stouter head ( Fig. 8A View FIGURE 8 ). Ozopore on 5th body-ring with posterior spine-like projection and not elevated ( Fig. 8F View FIGURE 8 ), while the spine-like projection is absent, elevated and thicker around in the other two species of Theratta ( Figs 3G View FIGURE 3 , 10F View FIGURE 10 ). Wave-like curve in the center of the posterior margin of the prozonites is absent in T. eravikulam n. sp. ( Fig. 8E View FIGURE 8 ), while it is present in the other two species of Theratta ( Figs 4A View FIGURE 4 , 10E View FIGURE 10 ). Tergites are fully covered with deeper striae in T. eravikulam n. sp. ( Fig. 8E View FIGURE 8 ), while the striae are less pronounced in T. mannavan n. sp. ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ) and T. shola n. sp. ( Fig. 10E View FIGURE 10 ), a unique character for the genus. Differs from T. mannavan n. sp. ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 ) and T. shola n. sp. ( Fig. 10B View FIGURE 10 ) by the absence of striae at the anterior margin of antennomeres ( Fig. 8A View FIGURE 8 ). Distal part of mesal process and lamellar process of podomere II of anterior gonopod rather roundish and broader than in T. mannavan n. sp.. Distal process of mesal process smaller and less lobular than in T. mannavan n. sp.. Podomere II of anterior gonopod with a remnant of a division posteriolaterally ( Figs 9D–F View FIGURE9 ). Posterior gonopod with six podomeres ( Fig. 9C View FIGURE9 ). T. eravikulam n. sp. shows a genetic p-distance in the COI gene of 25.3% to T. shola n. sp..
Note. The anterior body-rings, including the head and posterior gonopod of the holotype were damaged. Therefore, some features are described using an immature male paratype. It is a common phenomenon that the number of antennomeres increase in Colobognathan and other millipedes (see David & Couret 1983; Wong et al. 2020).
Etymology. Species epithet, eravikulam , noun in apposition, after the name of the type locality, the Eravikulam National Park.
Materials examined. 1 M holotype ( ZFMK-MYR 9752 A), 1 F paratype ( ZFMK-MYR 9752 C), 1 immature M paratype ( ZFMK-MYR 9752 B), 1 immature F paratype ( ZFMK-MYR 9752 ), India, Province Kerala, Idukki District, Munnar , Eravikulam National Park , Kadalar Shola , 10º08’24.3”N, 77º02’39.3”E, 1703 m, high altitude montane forest, Winkler extraction, leg. A. A. Pooja, J. Jithin, 12 Dec 2019 GoogleMaps .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Tribe |
Rhinotini |
Genus |