Actinopus ramirezi Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018

Miglio, Laura Tavares, Pérez-Miles, Fernando & Bonaldo, Alexandre B., 2020, Taxonomic Revision of the Spider Genus Actinopus Perty, 1833 (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Actinopodidae), Megataxa 2 (1), pp. 1-256 : 70-71

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.2.1.1
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D8203766-9E7B-468F-9E75-F21393A1BA3D
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5655583
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0975136A-FFC8-CE1B-FCD5-F8C5DE4D39FD
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Actinopus ramirezi Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018
status

Treatment

Actinopus ramirezi Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018 View in CoL

Actinopus ramirezi Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018: 63 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , fig. 32 A–G, 33 A–E, 44 (holotype ♂, [25º 39’ S 54º 30’ W], entre El Timbó y El Palmital, R. P. 101, Parque Nacional Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina, 13–15.ix.1992, P. Goloboff & C. Szumik leg., MACN-Ar 198206; paratype ♀, same data as holotype, MACN-Ar 19830; not examined); World Spider Catalog, 2020.

Diagnosis. Males of A. ramirezi ( Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig. 32 D–F) differ from those of most species of the pinhao group by PA continuous to PI. They resemble those of A. ducke ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 A–C), A. hirsutus ( Fig. 38 View FIGURE 38 A–C), A. cornelli ( Fig. 62 View FIGURE 62 A–C) and A. insignis (Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig. 45 B–D) by PA continuous to PAc. They differ from those of A. ducke ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 A–C) and A. confusus ( Fig. 44 View FIGURE 44 A–C) by BTA placed ventrally on prolateral tegular surface. They resemble those ofs A. pinhao ( Fig. 32 View FIGURE 32 A–C) and A. hirsutus ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 A–D) by hirsute legs, differing from A. pinhao by the absence of tegular swelling above PA and from A. hirsutus by BTA most pronounced, PA less pronounced and a serrated area developed, extending to the base of the embolus and arranged in three rows. Females differ from those of A. pampulha ( Fig. 49 D View FIGURE 49 ) and A. candango ( Fig. 54 D View FIGURE 54 ) by pore distribution reaching only 75% of the receptacles length; and from A. paraitinga by the absence of lateral swelling on receptacles.