Tullgrenella peniaflorensis Galiano, 1970

Marta, Kimberly S., Bustamante, Abel A., Hagopián, Damián, Teixeira, Renato A., Brescovit, Antonio D., Valiati, Victor H. & Rodrigues, Everton N. L., 2024, Taxonomic revision of the jumping spider genus Tullgrenella Mello-Leitão, 1941 (Araneae: Salticidae: Freyina), Zootaxa 5411 (1), pp. 1-71 : 58-60

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5411.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6CA22881-5405-400F-9108-02141164AE47

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10675886

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/081B87C6-FFF7-4C3F-6EAE-5ED3FD2802D9

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Tullgrenella peniaflorensis Galiano, 1970
status

 

Tullgrenella peniaflorensis Galiano, 1970 View in CoL

Figs 4F View FIGURE 4 , 7P View FIGURE 7 , 45A–F View FIGURE 45 , 46A–D View FIGURE 46 , 47A–D View FIGURE 47 , 54A–B View FIGURE 54

Zoobank. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:4ACCE138-D243-4B15-8ACA-2C3770EAA746

Tullgrenella peniaflorensis Galiano, 1970: 342 View in CoL , figs 51, 56 (holotype, female, CHILE, Peñaflor [33°36’23.4”S 70°52’42.3”W], II.1958, M. Toro leg. (MACN-Ar 6242), examined); Richardson, 2010: 45 View Cited Treatment , figs 127–129.

Diagnosis. Males of Tullgrenella peniaflorensis resemble those of T. selenita mainly by the large, longer tegular membranous process higher than the embolar base ( Fig. 46C View FIGURE 46 , see purple arrow) and the slightly sinuous distal cymbium ( Figs 4F View FIGURE 4 , 46C–D View FIGURE 46 vs 48C–D), but can be distinguished by the longer pointed RTA ( Fig. 46D View FIGURE 46 ) and the inclination of the ventral border of the conductor ( Fig. 46C View FIGURE 46 ). Females resemble those of T. selenita by the posteriorly-opening coupling pocket in a horizontal curly-bracket shape ( Figs 7P View FIGURE 7 vs 7Q, 47C–D vs 49C–D) and the ovoid spermathecae ( Figs 7P View FIGURE 7 vs 7Q), but can be distinguished by the ventral septum and the few loops of antero-medial portion of copulatory ducts ( Figs 7P View FIGURE 7 , 47C–D View FIGURE 47 ).

Description. Male (FNAG36 1455). Total length 5.18. Carapace length 2.30; width 1.92; height 1.34. Cephalic region length 1.53. Ocular area length 1.00; Anterior eyes row 1.66 wide; Posterior eyes row 1.78 wide. Distance ALE–PME 0.19; PME–PLE 0.23. Ocular diameter AME 0.42; ALE 0.23; PME 0.08; PLE 0.19. Clypeus height 0.15. Chelicerae, paturon length 1.00; Fang: 0.38 length. Endites length 0.77; 0.44 wide. Labium length 0.42, 0.42 wide. Sternum length 1.11, 0.85 wide. Abdomen length 2.88; 1.74 wide; height 1.69. Length femur I: 1.84; II: 1.54; III: 1.52; IV: 1.86. Patella I: 1.15; II: 0.90; III: 0.73; IV: 0.86. Tibia I: 1.38; II: 0.85; III: 0.81; IV: 1.27. Metatarsus I: 1.13; II: 0.79; III: 1.08; IV: 1.54. Tarsus I: 0.77; II: 0.58; III: 0.58; IV: 0.61. Formula legs: 1432. Palp, length of femur 0.69, patella 0.24, tibia 0.32, cymbium 0.77. Legs macrosetae, femur I–II: d1–1–1, p2di; III: d1–1–1, p2di, r0–1–2di; IV: d1–1–1, p1di, r1di. Patella I–II: p1di; III–IV: p1di, r2di. Tibia I: v2–1–2, p1–1–1; II: p1–0–1; III: v1– 1–2, p1–1–2, r1–0–2; IV: v1–1–2, p1–1–2, r1–1–2. Metatarsus I–II: v0–2–2; III: d1, v0–2–2, p2di, r2di; IV: d2, v0– 2–2, p2di, r2di. Palp macrosetae, femur: d1–1–1. Carapace as in genus ( Figs 45A–F View FIGURE 45 ). Legs dark. Abdomen reddish, with an anterior stripe of white scales ( Figs 45 View FIGURE 45 –FA) and with two circular white spots on the posterior region near to spinnerets ( Fig. 45A View FIGURE 45 ). Spinnerets as in genus ( Figs 46A–B View FIGURE 46 ). Palp, femur with reduced ventral basal protuberance. Tibial retrolateral apophysis sclerotized, acute, not exceeding the ventral tegulum ( Fig. 46D View FIGURE 46 ). Tegulum oblique to cymbium distal apex, longer than wider, C-shaped, with the short proximal retrolateral lobe of tegulum facing down ( Fig. 46C View FIGURE 46 ). Middle tegulum with central depression, with groove ( Fig. 46C View FIGURE 46 , see red arrow). Embolar base projected dorso-prolaterally, tegular membranous process up to embolar base ( Fig. 46C View FIGURE 46 , see purple arrow). Embolus thin, sclerotized, and slightly curved, not exceeding the cymbium apex ( Figs 46C–D View FIGURE 46 ). Projections accompany the embolus, a pars pendula about half of embolus length, a conductor cradle-shaped, about half of embolus length, dorsal, and prolateral to spermophore ( Fig. 46C View FIGURE 46 ).

Female. Described and illustrated by Galiano (1970: 341, 345, figs 51, 56).

Material examined. CHILE, Región de Coquimbo, Elqui, Cerro Grande, La Serena (29°56’37.8”S 71°13’08.2”W), 16.VIII.2003, L. S. Espinoza leg., 1♀ ( FNAG36 1455) GoogleMaps ; Región de Valparaíso, Quilpué [33°02’59.0”S 71°26’28.5”W], 1975, R. Calderón leg., 1♂ ( FNAG36 1078); GoogleMaps ditto, no date, A. Olivares leg. 1♂ ( FNAG36 1463); GoogleMaps Quilpué-Sector Las Rosas [33°04’01.6”S 71°27’02.8”W], no date, A. Olivares leg. 1♂ ( FNAG36 1464) GoogleMaps .

Distribution. Chile [Peñaflor ( Galiano 1970, Richardson 2010), Coquimbo, Región de Valparaíso ( Figs 54A– B View FIGURE 54 )].

Natural history. Found in the North of the Andean region ( Figs 54A–B View FIGURE 54 ). The variation in altitudinal occurrence of this species is 122–388 m a. s. l. ( Figs 54A–B View FIGURE 54 ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Salticidae

Genus

Tullgrenella

Loc

Tullgrenella peniaflorensis Galiano, 1970

Marta, Kimberly S., Bustamante, Abel A., Hagopián, Damián, Teixeira, Renato A., Brescovit, Antonio D., Valiati, Victor H. & Rodrigues, Everton N. L. 2024
2024
Loc

Tullgrenella peniaflorensis

Richardson, B. J. 2010: 45
Galiano, M. E. 1970: 342
1970
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF