Warnckandrena (Uncandrena)

Pisanty, Gideon & Wood, Thomas James, 2024, The early-diverging subgenera of the bee genus Andrena (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) in the Old World, Zootaxa 5474 (5), pp. 451-488 : 474-475

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5474.5.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3DDAA7F0-27D0-43E8-AAFB-E56F0E24FB3F

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12710354

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/077587FD-B859-6433-FF6C-DBEFEC24FED6

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Warnckandrena (Uncandrena)
status

subgen. nov.

Subgenus Uncandrena Pisanty subgen. nov.

Type species: Andrena bytinskii Warncke, 1969 View in CoL , designated here.

Description. Small-sized bees (8–9 mm). Body integument dark with moderate metallic luster, strongly shagreened, punctation mostly weak to absent ( Figs. 74–77 View FIGURES 74–80 , 81–84 View FIGURES 81–88 ). Male clypeus and paraocular area dark ( Fig. 83 View FIGURES 81–88 ). Head 1.2–1.3 times broader than long ( Figs. 76 View FIGURES 74–80 , 83 View FIGURES 81–88 ). Mandibles short in both sexes, very weakly bidentate in female ( Fig. 76 View FIGURES 74–80 ), strongly bidentate in male. Galea strongly shagreened and matt, impunctate, apex more or less rounded. Maxillary palpus extending beyond galea, six-segmented, segment 2 longest, 1.4 times longer than 1. Glossa of moderate length, 4–5 times longer than broad, extending beyond galea. Labial palpus about as long as glossa, four-segmented ( Figs. 76 View FIGURES 74–80 , 83 View FIGURES 81–88 ). Subgenal coronet developed on inner and hind margin of paramandibular process. Labral process of female much broader than long, weakly arched ( Fig. 76 View FIGURES 74–80 ), of male trapezoidal, apical margin weakly concave. Clypeus weakly protuberant, weakly flattened centrally, more so in males, 1.9 times broader than long in females ( Fig. 76 View FIGURES 74–80 ), 1.6 times in males ( Fig. 83 View FIGURES 81–88 ). Malar space absent. Inner margins of compound eyes weakly arched, weakly convergent below in females ( Fig. 76 View FIGURES 74–80 ), strongly convergent below in males ( Fig. 83 View FIGURES 81–88 ). Facial foveae drop-shaped, moderately broad, weakly separated from compound eye by very narrow, smooth linear area, fovea width equals 0.5 times antennocular distance ( Figs. 74, 76 View FIGURES 74–80 ). Distance of fovea from lateral ocellus about 1.2 ocellar diameters ( Fig. 74 View FIGURES 74–80 ). Flagellomere 1 longer than 2+3, 0.9 times shorter than 2+3+ 4 in females ( Fig. 76 View FIGURES 74–80 ), 0.7 times in males ( Fig. 83 View FIGURES 81–88 ). Vertex and gena normally developed, ocelloccipital distance 1–1.2 ocellar diameters, genal area 0.9–1.0 times as broad as compound eye. Preoccipital ridge carinate dorsally, becoming gradually rounded laterally ( Figs. 74 View FIGURES 74–80 , 81 View FIGURES 81–88 ). Dorsolateral angle of pronotum not to very slightly elevated, not forming a dorsolateral carina. Surface of mesepisternum and propodeum with strong alveolation or shagreenation, punctation weak. Profile of propodeum moderately separated into weakly sloping basal region vs. more vertical apical region, this separation weak in males, basal region about 1.2 times as long as metanotum. Propodeal triangle not to very slightly rugose ( Fig. 80 View FIGURES 74–80 ). Propodeal corbicula incomplete, corbicular fringe very thin and limited to dorsal side of corbicula, consisting of long strongly plumose hairs. Inner side of hind femur rounded. Inner hind tibial spur strongly broadened near base, more or less straight. Femoral and tibial scopae composed of simple hairs, tibial scopa weakly developed, hairs short and thin. Flocculus complete, very strongly developed, hairs very long ( Fig. 78 View FIGURES 74–80 ). Hind pretarsal claw with strong inner tooth. Forewing with two submarginal cells. Stigma 3.5–4 times longer than broad, 1.3 times broader than prestigma. Submarginal crossvein 1 reaching marginal cell 7 vein widths from stigma. Recurrent veins 1 and 2 reaching submarginal cell 2 at 0.3 and 0.8 of its length. Nervulus very strongly postfurcal ( Fig. 79 View FIGURES 74–80 ). Jugal lobe of hind wing 0.7 times shorter than vannal lobe. Profile of tergum 1 separated into declivous basal region versus horizontal posterior region, basal region with medial longitudinal rim. Tergal apical hair bands moderately developed ( Figs. 75, 77 View FIGURES 74–80 , 82, 84 View FIGURES 81–88 ). Female pygidial plate normally developed, without elevated medial area; male pygidial plate undeveloped. Male sternum 7 normally developed, with two small medioapical lobes ( Fig. 88 View FIGURES 81–88 ). Male sternum 8 normally developed, columnar, apical process weakly broadened, without emargination ( Fig. 87 View FIGURES 81–88 ). Genital capsule strongly rounded in dorsal view ( Fig. 85 View FIGURES 81–88 ). Dorsal gonocoxite lobe exceptionally developed, very long and narrow, club-shaped. Gonostylus strongly arched, apical blade weakly developed, shallowly spatulate dorsally, slightly protruding ventrally. Penis valves short and very broad, occupying almost entire space between gonostyli ( Figs. 85–86 View FIGURES 81–88 ).

Diagnosis. The most clearly defining feature of Andrena (Uncandrena) is the male’s unusual genital capsule, which is strongly rounded in overall shape, possessing extremely elongate, club-shaped dorsal gonocoxite lobes, and a very weakly developed gonostylus blade ( Figs. 85–86 View FIGURES 81–88 ). The subgenus is further characterised by the combination of forewing with two submarginal cells ( Fig. 79 View FIGURES 74–80 ), metallic integument, basally broadened female hind tibial spur, and non-rugose propodeal triangle ( Fig. 80 View FIGURES 74–80 ). As such, it cannot be confused with any other subgenus of Andrena . North American species of the subgenus Diandrena superficially resemble Uncandrena in their metallic integument and forewing’s two submarginal cells, but they clearly differ in most or all of the following characters: bidentate labral process, carinate pronotum, more rugose propodeal triangle, normally-developed female hind tibial spur, antefurcal to interstitial nervulus, and normally-developed male genitalia.

Biology. Uncandrena are active in springtime, specializing on Faboideae pollen, but also visit other diverse flowers, probably for nectar.

Distribution: Eastern Mediterranean (Levant and Turkey).

Etymology. The prefix Unc - is from the Latin uncus, which means ‘hook, barb’, in combination with Andrena , the name of the higher taxon. The name refers to the unique shape of the genital capsule, with the unusually long dorsal gonocoxite lobes reminiscent of protruding hooks. The gender of the name is feminine.

Included species. Andrena bytinskii Warncke, 1969 . The single species belonging to Uncandrena was previously assigned to Pallandrena ( Warncke 1969) or Poecilandrena ( Gusenleitner & Schwarz 2002; Pisanty et al. 2018).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Andrenidae

Genus

Warnckandrena

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF