Soyedina Ricker, 1952
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5306.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:21AD4F85-E313-47CB-BA98-9896D2B1DC05 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8056875 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/07181030-DF32-FFBC-FF12-FED8FA19F8DA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Soyedina Ricker, 1952 |
status |
|
VIII. Genus Soyedina Ricker, 1952 View in CoL View at ENA
http://lsid.speciesfile.org/urn:lsid: Plecoptera .speciesfile.org:TaxonName:6133
Type species. Nemoura vallicularia Wu, 1923 View in CoL
Range. Nearctic ( DeWalt et al. 2022).
Diagnosis. See Baumann (1975) for a comprehensive description of the genus. Grubbs & Baumann (2019) and Grubbs et al. (2019) provided a morphological- and SEM-based treatment for all 10 eastern Nearctic species. Females cannot be objectively determined to species without direct association with males.
Two keys are presented below. One, the dichotomous key in Grubbs & Baumann (2019) and the slight amendment with S. parkeri presented below are more effective if adult male terminalia are mounted in dorsal view and examined with compound light microscopy with a 10X objective to best visualize important diagnostic characteristics of the epiproct. A depression slide or a counting chamber provides sufficient depth for examination. The male abdomen may need to be dissected from the adult body and softened in a warm 10% solution of potassium hydroxide to manipulate the position of epiproct from recurved over the abdomen to directly posteriorly.
Two, as an alternative for use with standard dissecting light microscopy, an easy guide is also provided that focuses on a combination of the shape of the outer paraproct lobe, the asymmetry exhibited by the epiproct, and geographic distribution. This guide will enable the user to determine adult male specimens to species with minimal uncertainty.
Species key to eastern Nearctic Soyedina View in CoL View at ENA adult males
(modified from Grubbs & Baumann 2019)
1 Epiproct slightly asymmetric, especially the paired dorsal sclerites ( Figs. 123 View FIGURES 123‒128 , 135 View FIGURES 135‒138 )................................. 2
- Epiproct distinctly bilaterally asymmetric, including the paired dorsal and ventral sclerites ( Figs. 99 View FIGURES 99‒104 , 115 View FIGURES 115‒122 )............... 3
2 Outer paraproct lobe with a distinct anteriorly-directed sharp spur ( Fig. 127 View FIGURES 123‒128 )........................... S. kondratieffi View in CoL
- Outer paraproct lobe apically rounded and markedly expanded ( Fig. 137 View FIGURES 135‒138 ).................................. S. parkeri
3 Inner epiproct member terminated as a blunt process, triangular in shape apically ( Figs. 105–107 View FIGURES 105‒108 ); currently known only from a small geographic area in northern Georgia....................................................... S. amicalola View in CoL
- Inner epiproct member round apically, either straight-sided or slightly tapered ( Figs. 140–141 View FIGURES 139‒144 ) or distinctly flanged apically ( Figs. 110 View FIGURES 109‒114 , 116 View FIGURES 115‒122 )....................................................................................... 4
4 Inner epiproct member straight-sided or slightly tapered apically ( Figs. 140–141 View FIGURES 139‒144 ), ventral sclerites typically rounded apically ( Fig. 139 View FIGURES 139‒144 ), outer paraproct lobe robust, with a distinct anteriorly-directed triangular flap ( Fig. 143 View FIGURES 139‒144 )............. S. sheldoni View in CoL
- Inner epiproct member distinctly flanged apically ( Figs. 110 View FIGURES 109‒114 , 116 View FIGURES 115‒122 ), outer paraproct lobe not as above.................. 5
5 Inner epiproct member flanged and slightly directed laterally, flange lip approximately same width radially ( Figs. 116 View FIGURES 115‒122 , 130 View FIGURES 129‒134 ).. ................................................................................................... 6
- Inner epiproct member flanged and directed laterally, flange lip enlarged apically ( Figs. 110 View FIGURES 109‒114 , 146 View FIGURES 145‒150 )..................... 8
6 Outer paraproct lobe subtriangular in shape, terminating with a anteriorly-directed spur ( Fig. 133 View FIGURES 129‒134 ); currently known only from a small geographic area in southwestern Pennsylvania ................................................. S. merritti View in CoL
- Outer paraproct lobe variable in shape, with ( Figs. 120–121 View FIGURES 115‒122 , 155 View FIGURES 151‒156 ) or without an anteriorly-directed spur ( Fig. 119 View FIGURES 115‒122 )........ 7
7 Outer paraproct lobe variable in shape but not quadrate, with ( Figs. 116–117 View FIGURES 115‒122 ) or without an anteriorly-directed spur ( Fig. 119 View FIGURES 115‒122 )........................................................................................ S. carolinensis View in CoL
- Outer paraproct lobe quadrate, with an anteriorly-directed spur ( Fig. 155 View FIGURES 151‒156 ).............................. S. washingtoni View in CoL
8 Apical portion of outer paraproct lobe narrowed markedly in distal half ( Fig. 149 View FIGURES 145‒150 )........................ S. vallicularia View in CoL
- Apical portion of outer paraproct lobe not narrowed markedly in distal half ( Figs. 103 View FIGURES 99‒104 , 113 View FIGURES 109‒114 ).......................... 9
9 Outer paraproct lobe straight or slightly convex along dorsal margin ( Fig. 103 View FIGURES 99‒104 ), currently known from middle Tennessee south to northern Alabama and northern Mississippi ..................................................... S. alexandria View in CoL
- Outer paraproct lobe concave along dorsal margin ( Fig. 113 View FIGURES 109‒114 ), currently known only from the Mammoth Cave region in central Kentucky .................................................................................... S. calcarea View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Nemourinae |