Perilampus hyalinus, Say, 1829

Yoo, Jeong Jae & Darling, D. Christopher, 2024, Integrative taxonomic revision of the Nearctic Perilampus hyalinus species complex (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Perilampidae) resolves 100 years of confusion about the host associations of P. hyalinus Say, Journal of Hymenoptera Research 97, pp. 1301-1383 : 1301-1383

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.3897/jhr.97.133255

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:99F8596D-B97C-4E63-9C20-4BF550CC8E6D

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14286024

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/06509BE9-E133-5352-9D9C-50867FEE5424

treatment provided by

Journal of Hymenoptera Research by Pensoft

scientific name

Perilampus hyalinus
status

 

P. hyalinus View in CoL species group sensu Smulyan (1936) and Darling (1996)

Description.

Female. Color: head and body entirely or at least partially brightly iridescent (Fig. 2 A, H View Figure 2 ).

Head: in anterior view weakly transverse, slightly wider than high, HW / HH 1.2–1.3; slightly wider than pronotum, HW / PW 1.1–1.2. Frontal carina: distinct, extended from posterior margin of median ocellus (Fig. 2 B View Figure 2 ) to near lower eye margin (Fig. 2 A View Figure 2 ); in dorsal view narrow near median ocellus. Ocelli: median ocellus in line with lateral ocelli or only slightly advanced (Figs 2 B View Figure 2 , 12 G View Figure 12 ). Eye: slightly shorter than head height, EH / HH 0.6–0.7. Vertex: rounded behind. Occiput: with vertical groove below vertex, with subparallel costulae; occipital carina absent. Malar space (Fig. 2 A View Figure 2 ): with oblique striae obliterating malar sulcus (Fig. 2 D View Figure 2 ). Clypeus (Fig. 3 A View Figure 3 ): weakly transverse to strongly transverse, CW / CH 1.3–1.6; lateral sulci straight or weakly curved, strongly divergent; with small and indistinct tentorial pits; epistomal sulcus concave, deeper and more distinct than lateral sulci; ventral margin concave or nearly flat. Supraclypeal area (Fig. 3 A View Figure 3 ): subquadrate; shorter and narrower than clypeus, SCH / CH 0.5–0.6. Scape (Figs 3 C – E View Figure 3 ): length about 0.6 × EH; narrow throughout; pits absent or if present distad covering no more than 0.2 × scape length (Figs 3 D, E View Figure 3 ). Flagellum (Fig. 3 I View Figure 3 ): anellus transverse, AL / PL about 0.3; Fu 1 subquadrate, Fu 1 L / Fu 1 W 1.0–1.1; subequal to or slightly longer in length than pedicel, Fu 1 L / PL 1.0–1.3; Fu 2 subquadrate or transverse, Fu 3 – Fu 7 transverse; clava 4 - segmented, C 1–3 as long dorsad as ventrad, with distinct terminal button (C 4).

Mesosoma: slightly longer than wide, ML / MW 1.2–1.3. Pronotum: carinulate (Fig. 2 H View Figure 2 ); short, PN / MSC about 0.2; shorter along midline, 0.5–0.7 length laterad; anterior margin sharp, all rows of punctures on same plane. Lateral panel of pronotum: without flange (Fig. 4 D View Figure 4 ) or with flange below level of mesothoracic spiracle in posterior oblique view (Fig. 16 D View Figure 16 : arrow); anterior margin sharp, all rows of punctures on same plane. Prepectus: wide and triangular; differentiated from pronotum with distinct suture; ventral strap short, without row of alveolae; central area of lateral panel smooth, with foveae along dorsal and posterior margins. Mesoscutum (Fig. 2 H View Figure 2 ): midlobe without tubercle; notaulus distinct and continuous, uninterrupted by sculpture of mesoscutum. Mesoscutellum: without tubercle; slightly longer than mesoscutum, SC / MSC 1.2–1.3; strongly vaulted, frenum ventrad and not visible in the dorsal view. Axilla: with axillar shelf (Fig. 2 F View Figure 2 ). Axillula: elongate and finger-like, AxL / AxH usually 2.0 or greater (Fig. 2 F View Figure 2 ). Metanotum: short, length 0.4–0.5 × length of propodeum along midline. Propodeum: width about 3 × length along midline; submedian area smooth to weakly imbricate, with foveae or groove laterad median carina, delimited laterad and ventrad by complete plicae, dorsad by transverse band of foveae; callus with angulate process below spiracle, and alveolate-rugose, with alveolae sometimes obliterated below spiracle; nucha with transverse to arcuate rugae. Fore wing: elongate, WL / WW 2.3–2.4; hyaline, with yellow or brown venation; parastigma swollen with weak equilateral triangular process; postmarginal vein 0.7–0.8 × as long as marginal vein; stigmal vein 0.3–0.4 × as long as marginal vein; stigma with weak uncus.

Metasoma: petiole short and straplike, with weak transverse wrinkles; petiolar flange short with ventral margin of upper area with shallow emargination mesad; antecostal sulcus transverse, with weak vertical carinae laterad and smoothened mesad; Mt 2 with trapezoidal demarcation and shallow median groove, imbricate and wrinkled anteriad, and smooth posterad without lateral protruberances along midline, posterior margin straight and sparsely setose; Gt 3 smooth.

Male. As in female, except: Color: mesonotum sometimes nearly entirely black or with cupreous iridescence (Fig. 3 L View Figure 3 cf. Fig. 3 K View Figure 3 ). Eye: in dorsal view often more bulbous (Fig. 3 H View Figure 3 cf. Fig. 3 G View Figure 3 ). Ocellus: often larger (Fig. 3 H View Figure 3 cf. Fig. 3 G View Figure 3 ). Ocellar ratios LOD: POL: OOL: LOL: often shorter. Frontal carina: distance from lateral ocellus usually shorter. Malar space: MSL / EH often shorter. Flagellum: slightly wider (Fig. 3 J View Figure 3 cf. Fig. 3 I View Figure 3 ). Scape (Fig. 3 F View Figure 3 ): in anterior view weakly expanded distad, 1.3–1.4 × width above radicle; with distinct pits on anterior surface (Fig. 3 F View Figure 3 cf. Fig. 3 D, E View Figure 3 ); pitted surface not swollen in lateral view. Aedeagus: without a pair of lateral spines.

Diagnosis.

The P. hyalinus species group is characterized by: brightly iridescent coloration (Fig. 2 A, H View Figure 2 ), distinct frontal carina extended from posterior margin of median ocellus (Fig. 2 B View Figure 2 cf. Fig. 2 C View Figure 2 ) to near lower eye margin (Fig. 2 A View Figure 2 ), oblique costae obliterating malar sulcus (Fig. 2 D View Figure 2 cf. Fig. 2 E View Figure 2 ), carinulate pronotum (Fig. 2 H View Figure 2 cf. Fig. 2 I View Figure 2 ), distinct and uninterrupted notaulus (Fig. 2 H View Figure 2 ), axilla with axillar shelf (Fig. 2 F View Figure 2 cf. Fig. 2 G View Figure 2 ), and elongate and finger-like axillula (Fig. 2 F View Figure 2 cf. Fig. 2 G View Figure 2 ). The P. platigaster species group has a similar structure of the frontal carina, axilla, and axillula, but is distinguished by having a malar sulcus (Fig. 2 E View Figure 2 cf. Fig. 2 D View Figure 2 ) and the general body color black with or without weak iridescent reflections (Fig. 2 I View Figure 2 cf. Fig. 2 H View Figure 2 ).

Distribution.

The P. hyalinus species group occurs exclusively in the Western Hemisphere, from the southern Canada to Argentina.

Host association.

The previously published host records indicate that species are mostly hyperparasitoids, parasitizing dipteran ( Tachinidae and Sarcophagidae ) and hymenopteran parasitoids (Ichneumonoidea) of Lepidoptera , Orthoptera , and rarely, Phasmatoidea and Coleoptera (e. g. Smith 1912; Smith 1958; Pitts et al. 2002; Janzen and Hallwachs 2009). Smith (1912) gave a detailed description of the biology of P. hyalinus Say as an indirect hyperparasitoid — the planidia actively searches and burrows into the host of the primary parasitoid (e. g. caterpillars), but can only feed and develop on the dipteran or hymenopteran parasitoids. There are relatively fewer cases of primary parasitoids in the P. hyalinus species group, and the best documented are the parasitoids of Neodiprion sawflies ( Hymenoptera : Diprionidae ) ( Tripp 1962).

Remarks.

This species group was hypothesized as a monophyletic group based on morphological characters ( Darling 1996) and was well corroborated in our combined analysis of COI and ITS 2 (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ). The oblique costae obliterating the malar sulcus (Fig. 2 D View Figure 2 ) is the only shared and putatively derived character exclusive to this species group. Other character states (e. g. frontal carina) are widely distributed across Perilampidae in varying combinations, and a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of this family is required to understand their evolution. Yoo (2023) recognized two clades in the P. hyalinus species group supported by COI + ITS 2 and morphology: the P. carolinensis species complex, which has a parascrobal area abruptly narrowed in lateral view and the lateral panel of pronotum without a flange (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 Clade II), and the P. hyalinus species complex which has a parascrobal area usually gradually narrowed in lateral view and the lateral panel of pronotum with or without a flange (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 Clade III). The P. hyalinus species complex is further divided into three major clades which are congruent in genetic and morphological characters, for example the density of pits on the male scape, the shape of the lateral panel of the pronotum, and color of the mesonotum in females ( Yoo 2023). The species in the P. hyalinus clade 3 (IIIc, Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ), including P. arcus , P. seneca , and P. ute , are distinguished by a usually densely pitted male scape (Figs 17 G View Figure 17 , 17 H View Figure 17 , 19 H View Figure 19 , 19 I View Figure 19 , 21 G View Figure 21 , 21 H View Figure 21 ) and the lateral panel of pronotum with a triangular flange (Figs 16 D View Figure 16 , 18 D View Figure 18 , 20 D View Figure 20 ). The species in the P. hyalinus clade 1 (IIIa, Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ), including P. sonora , can be recognized by the cupreous mesonotum in females (Fig. 22 B View Figure 22 ), in addition to the usually sparse pits on the male scape (Fig. 23 G, H View Figure 23 ) and the lateral panel of the pronotum that lacks a triangular flange (Fig. 22 D View Figure 22 ). The P. hyalinus clade 2 species (IIIb, Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ), including P. crassus , P. neodiprioni , P. hyalinus , P. monocteni , P. pilosus , and P. sirsiris , also has a sparsely pitted male scape (Figs 5 G, H View Figure 5 , 7 F, G View Figure 7 , 9 G, H View Figure 9 , 11 G, H View Figure 11 , 13 G, H View Figure 13 , 15 F, G View Figure 15 ) and the lateral panel of pronotum without a triangular flange (Figs 4 D View Figure 4 , 6 D View Figure 6 , 8 D View Figure 8 , 10 D View Figure 10 , 12 D View Figure 12 , 14 D View Figure 14 ). But the P. hyalinus clade 2 species do not have the strong cupreous mesonotum in females (e. g. Fig. 4 B View Figure 4 ), except in P. pilosus (Fig. 15 A View Figure 15 ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

SuperFamily

Chalcidoidea

Family

Perilampidae

Genus

Perilampus