Hylorops Enderlein
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5004.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F82E8A73-5257-4D28-AB0A-70047B37E8A3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/052987E6-FF80-FFA2-FEC8-FDAB0218F915 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hylorops Enderlein |
status |
|
Genus Hylorops Enderlein View in CoL View at ENA
Hylorops Enderlein, 1921: 179 View in CoL . Type species: Hylorops philippii Enderlein, 1921 View in CoL , by original designation.
Refs.: Enderlein, 1921: 154 (classification, in Xylophaginae : Xylophagini); 174 (in key); Hardy, 1924: 365 (as syn. of Chiromyza View in CoL , in Chiromyzini); Stuardo, 1946: 62 (cat., as Hylorops View in CoL ); James, 1973a: 26.2 (cat.); Woodley, 1989: 302 (cat.); Oliveira & Pujol-Luz, 2000b: 1 (diag.); Pujol-Luz et al., 2001: 5 (com.); Woodley, 2001: 48 (cat.); Pujol-Luz & Pujol-Luz, 2014: 404 (list); Lessard et al. 2020: 15 (rev. of Australian species).
Comments. The genus is now monotypic and endemic to Chile. The two species known from Australia, Hylorops matruelis Enderlein, 1921 and H. australis ( Macquart, 1850) , were transferred to Chiromyza Wiedemann, 1820 (see Lessard et al. 2020: 13).
Hylorops philippii Enderlein, 1921: 179 View in CoL (in Xylophaginae : Xylophagini).
Holotype: female ( ZMHB). Type locality: Chile, Concepción. Distr.: Biobío Region: Concepción Province (Concepción); Araucanía Region: Malleco Province (Parque Nacional Tolhuaca); Los Lagos Region: Llanquihue Province (Puerto Montt).
Refs.: Lindner, 1943: 91 (list); Stuardo, 1946: 62 (cat.); James, 1973a: 26.2 (cat.); Oliveira & Pujol-Luz, 2000b: 2 (descr. of fem. term.), 3, fig. 1 (spermatheca); Woodley, 2001: 48 (cat.).
Comments. There are some specimens referred to Hylorops philippii Enderlein, 1921 in the literature (see Oliveira & Pujol-Luz 2000b), in which the genital fork resembles that of Chiromyza vittata ( Pujol-Luz & Oliveira 1999: 4) . It is interesting to note that Oliveira & Pujol-Luz’s female specimens of H. philippii , as many known females of Chiromyza and Nonacris Walker, 1850 , have nearly bare and dichoptic eyes, with only three to five flagellomeres in the antenna, and R 4+5 vein fused. Enderlein’s definitions of the genus and of his species, H. philippii , on the other hand, mentioned eight flagellomeres and M 3 reduced. If Enderlein’s number of flagellomeres is correct, this genus may be related to Mapuchemyia krausei Philippi, 1865 and Stenimantia carbonaria ( Philippi, 1865) (see below). These two also have four medial veins, while Chiromyza and Nonacris has only three medial veins. The shape of R 4+5, whether or not fused, of H. philippii is to be verified with the examination of the holotype. Males are still unknown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Hylorops Enderlein
Fachin, Diego Aguilar, González, Christian R., Elgueta, Mario & Hauser, Martin 2021 |
Hylorops
Enderlein, G. 1921: 179 |
Hylorops philippii
Enderlein, G. 1921: 179 |