Phyllium dardanus Westwood, 1859 (OUMNH; Fig. 20)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1173.104413 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5704F5B5-AE7B-4A79-A5DC-0B6592A77837 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/040E6A79-D413-5DD4-81D4-2BF39902D1B7 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Phyllium dardanus Westwood, 1859 (OUMNH; Fig. 20) |
status |
|
Phyllium dardanus Westwood, 1859 (OUMNH; Fig. 20)
Phyllium gelonus Gray, 1843 (NHMUK; lost according to Brock et al. 2022).
Differentiation.
Female Pulchriphyllium crurifolium stat. rev., comb. nov. are the easiest to differentiate from the other " Pulchriphyllium bioculatum "-like species by comparing the profemoral exterior lobe shape. In Pulchriphyllium crurifolium stat. rev., comb. nov. the anterior margin of the exterior profemoral lobe is nearly straight, giving the lobe a boxy appearance (Fig. 21A View Figure 21 ) vs the other " Pulchriphyllium bioculatum "-like species which have this margin notably rounded, giving the lobe a slight recurve appearance (Fig. 21B View Figure 21 ).
Males are difficult to differentiate, and even after reviewing numerous specimens in series there appears to be enough intraspecific variation to make reliable differentiation impossible. On average males tend to have slightly narrower profemoral exterior lobes with a strongly obtuse angle (Fig. 22B View Figure 22 ), but some of the other " Pulchriphyllium bioculatum "-like species can sometimes exhibit a similar lobe shape.
Eggs of Pulchriphyllium crurifolium stat. rev., comb. nov. are slightly smaller than the other " Pulchriphyllium bioculatum "-like species and have a great deal more raised nodes throughout the surfaces (Fig. 23D-F View Figure 23 ).
To date, the authors have yet to see an observation of a freshly hatched nymph of this taxon. With how unique and species-specific congenerics are (Fig. 8 View Figure 8 ), it is likely that this species can be additionally differentiated by the freshly hatched nymph habitus.
Distribution.
(Fig. 15A View Figure 15 ) At present known from three of the islands of the Seychelles: Mahé, Praslin, and La Digue (see Suppl. material 1 for list of observations).
Remarks.
This taxon was originally described as a unique species from the Seychelles ( Audinet-Serville 1838); however, over the decades this taxon has been treated either as a synonym, subspecies, or local form of " Pulchriphyllium bioculatum " ( Giglio-Tos 1910; Brock 1995; Hennemann et al. 2009). At present molecular data are lacking for this taxon, but there are numerous specimens in historic collections and recent citizen science observations (Fig. 22 View Figure 22 ) which illustrate a consistent and unique morphology. Biogeographically it is likely that this species is sister to the Indian or Sri Lankan species as other organisms are known to have utilized the Maldives archipelago from the Indian sub-continent at some point during low sea levels of the past to colonize the Seychelles ( O’Brien 2011; Bernardes et al. 2021).
In the decades following the description of Pulchriphyllium crurifolium stat. rev., comb. nov., there were several other taxa described from the Seychelles, but since their description they have been synonymized with Pulchriphyllium bioculatum ( Brock et al. 2022). Of the three taxa described from the Seychelles ( Phyllium crurifolium , Phyllium dardanus , and Phyllium gelonus ), only type specimens of Phyllium crurifolium and Phyllium dardanus remain (the type of Phyllium gelonus is reported as lost according to Brock et al. 2022). Thankfully, the syntype series of Pulchriphyllium crurifolium stat. rev., comb. nov. (the senior synonym) has survived within the OUMNH collection. Within the original description, the syntypes are noted as: "East Indies. The male labeled from the Seychelles Islands by Latreille. Collection of M. le comte Dejean. I have both sexes" ( Audinet-Serville 1838). Of these specimens, the male from the Latrielle collection (Fig. 19D View Figure 19 ), and three specimens labeled as from Serville (Fig. 19A-C View Figure 19 ) have been traced within the OUMNH collection. Unfortunately, any syntypes which were within the "Collection of M. le comte Dejean" (Pierre François Marie Auguste Dejean; 1780-1845) could not be traced. In choosing the specimen to be designated as the lectotype, we chose the specimen in question following several lines of thought. First, we wish to designate a female specimen as males are morphologically indistinguishable from several congenerics. Second, following chapter 16, article 74E of the ICZN Code ( ICZN 1999) we chose the female specimen with the explicit collection data of “Seychelles” (Fig. 19B View Figure 19 ).
The eggs of Pulchriphyllium crurifolium stat. rev., comb. nov. are very similar to most Pulchriphyllium species therefore this species adds credibility to the phylogeny of Büscher et al. (2023). Within Büscher et al. (2023) the Pulchriphyllium are primarily characterized as "type 7" eggs (defined as having "exochorionic structures fused to dense fins"). The only Pulchriphyllium species which lacks this type is Pulchriphyllium giganteum which is sister species to all other Pulchriphyllium . Even though Pulchriphyllium crurifolium stat. rev., comb. nov. could not be included within our phylogeny (Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ), based upon adult and egg morphology this species likely is more closely related to one of the other " Pulchriphyllium bioculatum -like" species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Phyllium dardanus Westwood, 1859 (OUMNH; Fig. 20)
Cumming, Royce T., Le Tirant, Ste ́ phane, Linde, Jackson B., Solan, Megan E., Foley, Evelyn Marie, Eulin, Norman Enrico C., Lavado, Ramon, Whiting, Michael F., Bradler, Sven & Bank, Sarah 2023 |
Phyllium gelonus
Gray 1843 |