Neopomphale rubescens, HANSSON & LASALLE, 2003
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222930110096744 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:978AA7CC-7167-41BE-AC06-FFEE13D1A599 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FFC309-EE5A-2502-FD82-FF54FB1FF94C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Neopomphale rubescens |
status |
|
Key to species of Neopomphale View in CoL View at ENA
1 Gastral membranes red to yellowish red........... 2
– Gastral membranes yellowish to white, or pale brown........ 3
2(1) Face and frons partially (male) to almost entirely (female) white; male flagellum (figure 36) stout (first claval segment 2.1× as long as wide), with short setae (setae on first claval segment 1.3× as long as segment).... rubescens View in CoL sp. n. X, W
– Face and frons dark; male flagellum (figure 48) narrow (first claval segment 3.6× as long as wide), with long setae (setae on first claval segment 2.2× as long as segment)............... azofeifai View in CoL sp. n. W
3(1) Wing fringe on fore wing long, about as long as submarginal vein (figure 65).................... longipilis View in CoL sp. n. X, W
– Wing fringe on fore wing shorter, usually at most 0.7× as long as submarginal vein (figures 60–63, 64)................ 4
4(3) Mesoscutum and frons predominantly or completely pale yellow...................... aleurothrixi (Dozier) View in CoL X, W
– Mesoscutum and frons predominantly dark brown to black...... 5
5(4) Longest distance from base of marginal vein to apical margin of fore wing is to anterior one-half of wing (figure 63), and speculum missing; base of fore wing not strongly infuscate............. xenipennis View in CoL sp. n. X
– Longest distance from base of marginal vein to apical margin of fore wing is to median part or to posterior one-half of wing, or speculum present; base of fore wing sometimes strongly infuscate............. 6
6(5) Basal one-third of fore wing infuscate and speculum very small (as in rubescens View in CoL (figure 60))................... 7
– Base of fore wing not infuscate or speculum larger (e.g. figures 4, 62, 64)... 9
7(6) Head less transverse (0.9× as high as wide)..... graciliclava View in CoL sp. n. X
– Head transverse (0.7× as high as wide)............ 8
8(7) Setae on flagellomeres ± erect (figure 50) and at least twice as long as segment attached to............... erecta View in CoL sp. n. W
– Setae on flagellomeres not erect (figure 37) and shorter than twice the length of segment attached to............. cerrobius View in CoL sp. n. W
9(6) Scutellar setae situated at or only slightly separated from hind margin of scutellum (figure 57)............... prymna View in CoL sp. n. X
– Scutellar setae situated in the middle or slightly behind the middle of scutellum. 10
10(9) Head transverse (figure 58), 0.7× as high as wide; malar space slanting steeply inwards towards mouth opening......... transversa View in CoL sp. n. X
– Head less transverse (e.g. as in figures 17, 59), at least 0.8× as high as wide; malar space slanting less steeply inwards............. 11
11(10) Female with hind femur predominantly pale (but with an apical dark spot) and hind tibia dark.............. dichrous View in CoL sp. n. X
– Females not with this combination of colour on hind leg; if male continue here. 12
12(11) Male with funicular segment distinctly asymmetric (figures 41, 55).... 13
– Male funicular segment symmetric; if female continue here...... 14
13(12) Fore wing with three or four admarginal setae (i.e. setae on ventral surface of wing membrane, close to marginal vein)....... dichrous View in CoL sp. n.
– Fore wing with one admarginal seta........ nonaequa View in CoL sp. n.
14(12) Fore wing with a wide bare stripe below marginal vein (figure 64), ratio width of bare stripe (measured below middle of marginal vein)/length of submarginal vein=0.32................ depilis View in CoL sp. n. X
– Fore wing with setae close to marginal vein, at most with a narrow bare stripe
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |