Miostrellus sp.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.2478/if-2019-0026 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FF8F57-F33E-FFA7-D25E-67D8FB5D1ADA |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Miostrellus sp. |
status |
|
cf. Miostrellus sp.
Text-fig. 8h, i View Text-fig
M a t e r i a l. Erkertshofen 2: BSP 1974 XIV 1207, right P4, 1.00 × 1.00; BSP 1974 XIV 1203, left m1, 1.30 × 0.75 × 0.80.
D e s c r i p t i o n a n d c o m p a r i s o n. The P4 crown from Erkertshofen 2 (specimen BSP 1974 XIV 1207) is compressed in the anteroposterior direction with a weakly pronounced anterolingual cuspid on the cingulum but without a posterolingual talon ( Text-fig. 8i View Text-fig ). All these features differentiate the P4 from Erkertshofen 2 from those of Myotis and Plecotus . It differs from Submyotodon petersbuchensis ( Ziegler 2003: 478, fig. 6(7)) in being larger ( Ziegler 2003: 480–481, tab. 8), in having a less developed anterolingual cuspid on the cingulum and in lacking the posterolingual talon. The P4 from Erkertshofen 2 morphologically is similar to M. aff. noctuloides from Sandelzhausen (specimen BSP 1959 II 7756; Ziegler 2000: 127, pl. 10, fig. 119) but differs in being larger ( Tab. 8) and in having a small anterolingual cuspid on the cingulum. On the other hand, it is similar in size to M. petersbuchensis ( Tab. 8) which, however, has no anterolingual cuspid of the cingulum (compare with Rosina and Rummel 2012: 471, fig. 5A). The m1 from Erkertshofen 2 (specimen BSP 1974 XIV 1203) shows an elongated, but somewhat curved, paralophid and a wide trigonid, that indicate it most likely does not belong to Myotis , but to Miostrellus . It is larger than M. risgoviensis , but smaller than both the M. petersbuchensis and E. aurelianensis and closest in size to M. noctuloides from Sansan ( Tab. 8).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.