Miostrellus cf. petersbuchensis ROSINA et RUMMEL, 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.2478/if-2019-0026 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FF8F57-F339-FFA7-D03D-669DFDD21DE1 |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Miostrellus cf. petersbuchensis ROSINA et RUMMEL, 2012 |
status |
|
Miostrellus cf. petersbuchensis ROSINA et RUMMEL, 2012
Text-fig. 8j, l, m View Text-fig
M a t e r i a l a n d m e a s u r e m e n t s. Petersbuch 2: PCMRCh5, left m1, 1.50 × 0.85 × 0.95; PCMRCh6, right mnd with m1, 1.40 × 0.90 × 0.95; PCMRCh7, left p4, 0.75 × 0.70; PCMRCh87, right m3, 1.20 × 0.70 × 0.65; BSP 1979 XXII 5365, left M1, 1.35 × 1.60; BSP 1979 XXII a, left M1, 1.35 × 1.65; BSP 1979 XXII 5367, left M3, 0.90 × 1.70; BSP 1980 XXII 4805, left P4, 0.95 × 0.90.
D e s c r i p t i o n a n d c o m p a r i s o n. The M1 from Petersbuch 2 (specimens BSP 1979 XXII 5365 and BSP 1979 XXII a) have neither paraloph nor paraconule. The weak metaloph merges with the postprotocrista and disappears at the base of the metacone and thus, the trigon basin is closed. The hypocone is almost absent. The M3 crown from Petersbuch 2 (specimen BSP 1979 XXII 5367) is somewhat compressed in the anteroposterior direction, the metacone is reduced, the paraloph is weak and the paraconule is absent. The Р4 crown (specimen BSP 1980 XXII 4805) is also compressed in the anteroposterior direction, its lingual talon is moderately developed and the anterolingual cuspid is absent. The upper molars from Petersbuch 2 are distinguished from those of Myotis in having of a well-developed cingulum, a compact crown of upper molars and a lack of conules and hypocones. Morphologically they are most similar to Miostrellus petersbuchensis and also in size ( Tab. 8).
The p4 crown from Petersbuch 2 (specimen PCMRCh7) is triangular in occlusal view and has well-developed anterolingual and posterolingual cuspules ( Text-fig. 8l View Text-fig ). It differs from M. noctuloides from Sansan and Petersbuch 6 (compare with specimens NMA P6-01045, NMA P10- 00591; Ziegler 2003: 462, fig. 3(2)) in being larger ( Tab. 8). Morphologically and also in size the p4 from Petersbuch 2 is most similar to that of M. petersbuchensis ( Tab. 8).
The m1 paralophids from Petersbuch 2 (specimens PCMRCh5, PCMRCh6) are somewhat curved while the trigonids of the crowns are very wide ( Text-fig. 8j, m View Text-fig ) which differentiate these teeth from those of Myotis . Nevertheless, the m1 paralophids are significantly less curved than those of Plecotus . These morphological traits of the crowns, together with their myotodonty, supports their possibly connection to either Eptesicus or Miostrellus . The m3 crown from Petersbuch 2 (specimen PCMRCh87) differs from that of Myotis in having a somewhat reduced talonid, an elongated and curved paralophid and a narrow trigonid. The lower molars are smaller than those of E. aurelianensis but larger than M. risgoviensis and M. noctuloides ( Tab. 8). Therefore they morphologically correspond well with M. petersbuchensis ( Rosina and Rummel 2012: 471, fig. 5E, F).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.