Rhinolophus grivensis DEPÉRET, 1892
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.2478/if-2019-0026 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FF8F57-F323-FFBA-D3D9-6296FE361C48 |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Rhinolophus grivensis DEPÉRET, 1892 |
status |
|
Rhinolophus grivensis DEPÉRET, 1892
Text-fig. 2j, n–o View Text-fig
M a t e r i a l. Erkertshofen 1: BSP 1962 XIX 4194, left M2.
Erkertshofen 2: BSP 1974 XIV 1114, left C sup.
Petersbuch 2: BSP 1976 XXII 5543, left mxl with P4; PCMRCh55a, right m1; PCMRCh56a, left m2; PCMRCh56b, right m2; PCMRCh57c, right m3; PCMRCh48, right M3; PCMRCh49a, left M1 (damaged); PCMRCh49b, left M1; PCMRCh49c, left M2; PCMRCh49d, right M2; PCMRCh27, left P4; PCMRCh29, right C sup.; PCMRCh30, right C sup.; PCMRCh31, left C sup.; PCMRCh42, right C sup.; PCMRCh43, left C sup.
M e a s u r e m e n t s. See Tab. 4.
D e s c r i p t i o n a n d c o m p a r i s o n.The preserved fossils share all the morphological traits of Rhinolophus species : the upper canine is semilunar in occlusal view with a well-developed cingulum ( Text-fig. 2j View Text-fig ), p3 was displaced buccally from the midline of the tooth-row, and the m3 talonid is only slightly smaller than the trigonid ( Text-fig. 2o View Text-fig ). However, there is a significant space between the canine and P 4 in the maxillary ( Text-fig. 2n View Text-fig ). This is the smallest and most gracile Rhinolophus species from the studied localities ( Tab. 4) and morphologically corresponds to R. grivensis (e.g. Ziegler 2003: 456–459).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.