Ctenocolum acapulcensis Kingsolver & Whitehead, 1974

Albuquerque, Felícia Pereira De, Manfio, Daiara & Ribeiro-Costa, Cibele Stramare, 2014, A contribution to the knowledge of New World Bruchinae (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae): taxonomic revision of Ctenocolum Kingsolver & Whitehead, with description of five new species, Zootaxa 3838 (1), pp. 1-45 : 35-36

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3838.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1534C775-D28D-470F-9AEC-8BABB3D8FA56

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6124253

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FF87F5-FFCB-FFDD-38AD-FBFEFC1375C9

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Ctenocolum acapulcensis Kingsolver & Whitehead, 1974
status

 

Ctenocolum acapulcensis Kingsolver & Whitehead, 1974

( Figs. 18 View FIGURES 17 – 21 , 31 View FIGURES 31 – 34 , 43 View FIGURES 35 – 43 , 62 View FIGURES 61 – 65 , 75 View FIGURES 72 – 76 , 87 View FIGURES 85 – 90 , 99 View FIGURES 91 – 99 )

Ctenocolum acapulcensis Kingsolver & Whitehead (1974a) : 286, 288, 289, 311 (original description, key, characters, distribution, figures, host plant, Type-locality: “ Mexico, Guerrero, Acapulco”); Janzen (1977): 417 (host plant); Janzen (1978): 183 (host plant); Janzen (1980): 947 (host plant); Johnson & Kingsolver (1981): 418 (catalog); Udayagiri & Wadhi (1989): 78 (catalog); Johnson (1998): 148 (distribution, host plant); Romero & Johnson (2004): 623 (catalog); Lorea- Barocio et al. 2006: 518 (distribution, host plant).

Caryedes acapulcensis: Lorea-Barocio et al. (2006): 518 (distribution, host plant).

Type material. Ctenocolum acapulcensis Kingsolver & Whitehead, 1974a . Holotype deposited in USNM, male: “Bot. N 226.” [white label handwritten in black]; “Acapulco./ Mex.” [white label handwritten in black]; “Collection/ Chittenden” [white label printed in black]; “ MEX. Guerrero./ Acapulco vic./ X.1894 – III.1895 / E. Palmer # 226” [white label handwritten in black]; “ Lonchocarpus / eriocarinalis / Micheli/ USNM herb.” [white label handwritten in black]; “acapulcaensis” [white label handwritten]; “habitus/ drawing” [white label handwritten in black]; “ HOLO /72797” [red label, HOLO letters printed in black, 72797 numbers handwritten in black]; “ HOLOTYPE ♂/ Ctenocolum / acapulcensis / Kings. + Whd.” [white label with red margin, HOLOTYPE letters printed in red, remainder handwritten in black].

Note. Kingsolver & Whitehead (1974a) indicated that the holotype and one paratype are deposited in the USNM. The holotype received from USNM was examined and coincide with the description ( Kingsolver & Whitehead, 1974a).

Additional material. MEXICO: Jalisco: 2, La Huerta, Rancho Cuixmala, 1992, #1033, L. Rico col., reared seeds Lonchocarpus eriocarinalis ( TAMU). COSTA RICA: Guanacaste: 1, Santa Rosa National Park, Bosque San Emilio, Setor Santa Rosa, 15.IV.1985, D. H. Janzen col., Lonchocarpus costaricensis ( DZUP).

Diagnosis. Ctenocolum acapulcensis differs from all other species by having hind femur without toothed carina at the external ventral margin ( Fig. 75 View FIGURES 72 – 76 ). It is the only species of the group that has conspicuous teeth at the base of striae 3 and 4.

Redescription. BL: 4.4–4.8 mm; BW: 3.1–3.4 mm.

Integument. Dorsum black, sometimes mostly black and reddish brown. Antenna brown and dark brown; first antennomeres 8–10 almost entirely dark brown, last antennomere brown ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 17 – 21 ). Pygidium rufous or brown or rufous and dark brown. Ventral region rufous, black and brown. Front and middle femur and tibia brown or brown and dark brown to black; hind femur reddish brown and black.

Pubescence. Pronotum brown, yellowish gray and black; sparse setae exposing the integument forming an oval, wide area from anterior to posterior region divided or not by transversal and longitudinal strip of denser setae and on each lateral region one small rounded area ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 17 – 21 ). Elytra strongly variegated, brown, yellowish gray, black and white setae; interstria 1 bellow scutellum with yellowish gray and white short dense strip; interstria 3 only with white setae at submedian region ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 17 – 21 ). Pygidium dense, white and yellowish gray; sparse setae on two basal and four lateral small areas; at median region a larger area with sparse setae ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 35 – 43 ). Ventral region brown, yellowish gray and white ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 61 – 65 ).

Head. Ocular sinus 0.3 mm; ocular index 8.0–11.6; length of eyes in frontal view behind sinus 0.34 mm ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 31 – 34 ). Antenna strongly serrate from antennomere 3 or 4-10 in male. Frons with frontal carina ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 31 – 34 ).

Prothorax. Pronotum with median gibbosity strongly elevated, divided or not by longitudinal sulcus and divided by transversal sulcus ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 61 – 65 ); lateral gibbosity strongly elevated; basal lobe with or without depression and slightly or strongly emarginated ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 17 – 21 ).

Mesothorax and metathorax. Elytra, striae with punctures moderately impressed; conspicuous teeth at base of striae 3 and 4; tooth of stria 4 closer to base of tooth of stria 3 than to anterior margin of elytra; stria 6 not impressed, formed only by isolated puntuation. Hind femur ( Fig. 75 View FIGURES 72 – 76 ) on external ventral margin without toothed carina; without denticles above of external ventral margin; pecten with 10–12 teeth. Hind tibia ( Fig. 75 View FIGURES 72 – 76 ) slightly emarginated beside mucro; lateral coronal denticles absent.

Abdomen. Pygidium subequal, oval, at median basal region with moderately impressed punctures ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 35 – 43 ).

Male genitalia. Median lobe with ventral valve as long as wide, lateral margin straight on subapical region ( Fig. 87 View FIGURES 85 – 90 ), basal margin not emarginated. Internal sac, lateral apex with short tuft of setae, hinge sclerite Sshaped, long, extending over 1/2 of subapical region; subapical region with homogeneously distributed spicules, forming an elongated strip; median region with homogeneously distributed spicules, dense denticles and smooth sclerite, subsquare with stems oriented forward, longer than central region ( Fig. 87 View FIGURES 85 – 90 ); submedian region without sclerite and denticles; basal region with spicules, without denticles and spines. Tegmen ( Fig. 99 View FIGURES 91 – 99 ), lateral lobes separated by emargination about 0.5 times the length of lateral lobes; internal margin near end of emargination curved, forming a "U"; not expanded at apex, about the same width of the median region; without membranous projection at apex.

Note. The males of this species are the only in the genus with strongly serrate antenna. Unfourtunately, we had not females in our samples to compare antennal forms.

Distribution. Neotropical region: Mexico (Jalisco, Guerrero), Costa Rica (Guanacaste).

Host plant (Tables I–II). Papilionoideae : Lonchocarpus eriocarinalis Micheli.

New record: Papilionoideae : L. costaricensis (Donn. Sm.) Pittier.

USNM

Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History

DZUP

Universidade Federal do Parana, Colecao de Entomologia Pe. Jesus Santiago Moure

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Chrysomelidae

SubFamily

Bruchinae

Genus

Ctenocolum

Loc

Ctenocolum acapulcensis Kingsolver & Whitehead, 1974

Albuquerque, Felícia Pereira De, Manfio, Daiara & Ribeiro-Costa, Cibele Stramare 2014
2014
Loc

Ctenocolum acapulcensis

Johnson 1998: 148
Udayagiri 1989: 78
Johnson 1981: 418
Janzen 1980: 947
Janzen 1978: 183
Janzen 1977: 417
Kingsolver 1974: 286
1974
Loc

Caryedes acapulcensis: Lorea-Barocio et al. (2006) : 518

Lorea-Barocio et al. (2006) : 518
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF