Scoposcartula furcifera Leal, Mejdalani et Cavichioli

Leal, Afonso H., Mejdalani, Gabriel & Cavichioli, Rodney R., 2005, Two new species of the Neotropical leafhopper genus Scoposcartula (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellini), Zootaxa 848, pp. 1-9 : 5-8

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.170729

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6264744

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE87DC-FF87-FF94-6D7D-FE9CF3774EAC

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Scoposcartula furcifera Leal, Mejdalani et Cavichioli
status

sp. nov.

Scoposcartula furcifera Leal, Mejdalani et Cavichioli View in CoL , sp. nov.

( Figs 9–23 View FIGURES 9 – 15 View FIGURES 16 – 23 )

Diagnosis. Head and thorax ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ), in dorsal view, orange marked with dark brown to black; pronotum with inverted Y­shaped dark brown to black macula on posterior twothirds that extends onto scutellum. Paraphysis ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ) asymmetrical, elongate, broader and twisted on apical half; apex acute.

Length. Male, 8.4 mm; female, 9.0– 9.6 mm.

Head and thorax. Head ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ) with median length of crown about six­tenths interocular width and four­tenths transocular width; crown deltoid; ocelli closer to inner eye margin than to median line of crown; epistomal suture complete; clypeus not produced, its upper portion continuing contour of frons in profile, lower portion more nearly horizontal than remainder of face. Pronotal width ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ) approximately equal to transocular width; disc of pronotum transversely striated and glabrous; posterior margin almost rectilinear to slightly concave; dorsopleural carinae complete, declivous anteriorly. Forewings ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ) with distinct veins, but base of inner anteapical cell indistinct; surface mostly opaque, without punctures; membrane not clearly delimited. Hindfemoral setal formula 2:1:1. Other morphological characters of head and thorax as in the generic description (see Young 1977: 669).

Male genitalia. Pygofer ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ), in lateral view, triangular with narrowly rounded apex, with many macrosetae on apical portion and extending anteriorly along ventral margin, microsetae present. Subgenital plates ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ) triangular, gradually tapered towards narrow apical portion, with uniseriate macrosetae laterally, microsetae present. Styles ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ) extending approximately as far posteriorly as apex of connective, with single preapical seta, apical portion well­developed, foot­shaped, truncate apically, directed outwards. Connective ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ) Y­shaped, stem long and thin, arms widely divergent. Aedeagus ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ) short with digitiform ventral process arising at base and directed posteroventrally, shaft with two dentiform processes on dorsal margin. Paraphysis ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ) simple, asymmetrical, elongate, broader and twisted on apical half; apex acute.

Female genitalia. Sternite VII ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 16 – 23 ) moderately produced posteriorly, anterior margin with broad convex internal projection, basal third with pair of lateral projections, posterior portion with median more sclerotized area, posterior margin with median toothlike process. Pygofer ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 16 – 23 ), in lateral view, subtriangular with acute apex and curved sclerotized lateral line on dorsal portion; macrosetae mostly on posterior portion and extending anteriorly along ventral margin. Sclerite on internal sternite VIII (genital chamber) ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 16 – 23 ) semilunar, convex anteriorly with small median emargination, concave posteriorly. Bases of first valvulae ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 16 – 23 ) of ovipositor, in ventral view, with pair of basal lobes separated by constriction from remainder of shaft. Second valvulae ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 16 – 23 ), in lateral view, regularly broadened beyond basal curvature, preapical prominence ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 16 – 23 ) distinct, apex ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 16 – 23 ) narrowly rounded; teeth ( Figs 21–23 View FIGURES 16 – 23 ) distributed from basal curvature to apex, distinctly triangular or rounded; denticles on teeth and apical portion of shaft.

Color. Crown, pronotum, and scutellum ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ) yellow to orange marked with dark brown to black; ventral body surface and legs mostly yellow. Face yellow with brown stripes on muscle impressions; middle area of frons of three paratypes with two more or less distinct longitudinal dull brown stripes, these convergent and broader on upper portion; apex of crown with group of three contiguous dark brown to black maculae forming an arch, two other dark brown to black maculae on margin of crown more laterally; two transverse dark brown to black maculae adjacent to eyes and across ocelli. Pronotum ( Fig. View FIGURES 9 – 15

9) with inverted Y­shaped dark brown to black macula on posterior two­thirds and extending over scutellum; pair of small dark brown to black maculae just before Y­shaped macula; lateral portions with pair of transverse club­shaped dark brown to black maculae with their broader ends directed medially (maculae interrupted in the holotype). Scutellum ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ) with dark brown to black macula on median portion between arms of Y­shaped macula. Forewings ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ) brown with series of small yellow maculae on corium and clavus between longitudinal veins, extending from base to median third; conspicuous roundish large yellow macula on corium just anterior to claval apex.

Etymology. The epithet furcifera (from Latin furca = fork and fero = to bear) refers to the large bifurcated (Y­shaped) macula on the pronotum and scutellum, which is diagnostic of this new species.

Type material. Holotype: male, Brazil, “ENCRUZILHADA BA [State of Bahia; 15°31’S, 40°54’W]\ BRASIL IX ­ 1975 \ M. ALVARENGA Leg”, DZUP. Paratypes: four females: “ENCRUZILHADA ­ BAHIA \ BRASIL 980m XI/[19]74\ M. Alvarenga leg.”, two deposited in DZUP and two in MNRJ.

Taxonomic notes. Scoposcartula furcifera keys to S. oculata using Young’s (1977) key because of the similar color pattern of their forewings ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ). Besides, the forewings of S. bilunata have also a similar color pattern, as can be seen in the illustration provided by Signoret (1855). However, S. furcifera can be distinguished from S. oculata and S. bilunata by the color pattern of head and thorax ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ), especially because of the inverted Y­shaped macula on the pronotum and scutellum. The new species seems to be more closely related to S. bilunata , mainly because of the similarities in the aedeagus ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ), such as the basiventral and the dorsal dentiform processes. Scoposcartula furcifera shares with S. basimacula , S. bilunata , S. concinna , and S. lancifera the presence of a simple paraphysis ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ) (without a branch, process, or projection). The paraphysis of S. furcifera is different however, mainly because of its torsion. The female is externally similar to the male. Its pygofer ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 16 – 23 ) is distinctive for having an acute apex and a curved sclerotized lateral line on the dorsal portion.

DZUP

Universidade Federal do Parana, Colecao de Entomologia Pe. Jesus Santiago Moure

MNRJ

Museu Nacional/Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Cicadellidae

Genus

Scoposcartula

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF