Dichelops, Spinola, 1837
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3157.1.6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4390430 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FD87B1-0834-FFFB-FF0D-FF2BF1E5721B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Dichelops |
status |
|
Key to the species of subgenus Dichelops (modified from Grazia, 1978)
1. Humeri not projected, obtuse or bearing a small spine, at most barely surpassing rhomboid projections of posterolateral margins of pronotum (figs. 1‒3)............................................................................. 2
1´. Humeri projected as wide, subacute or acute at apex processes, or with long spines surpassing an imaginary longitudinal line crossing third tergite (fig. 4)............................................................................ 5
2. Superior process of pygophore present..................................................................... 3
2´. Superior process of pygophore absent......................................................... saltensis Grazia
3. Ventral rim with bristle tufts laterad to median notch (fig. 6); parameres twisted, head of paramere shorter than foot (fig. 10)........................................................................................ avilapiresi Grazia
3’. Ventral rim of pygophore without 1+1 bristle tufts laterad to median notch (figs. 7‒9); parameres not twisted (figs. 11‒13), head of paramere as long as foot.......................................................................... 4
4. Outer anterolateral angles of sternites with a small black spot; ventral rim of pygophore straight in the middle (fig. 7); gc8 tumescences wide, occupying inner 3/4 of each plate (fig. 18); capsula seminalis with three projections.... australis sp. nov.
4’. Outer anterolateral angles of sternites without a small black spot; ventral rim of pygophore with a mesial notch (fig. 9); gc8 tumescences narrower, occupying inner half of each plate (fig. 17); capsula seminalis with two projections..... pradoi Grazia
5. Juga abruptly convergent at tylus level, thence narrowing progressively towards acute apex.......................... 6
5´. Juga uniformly narrowing toward acute apex............................................................... 9
6. Humeri as broad projections, subacute apically, directed anterolaterad, just surpassing an imaginary longitudinal line across third connexivum..................................................................................... 7
6´. Humeri produced as long spines, acute apically, quite surpassing an imaginary longitudinal line across third connexivum.. 8
7. Ventral rim of pygophore uniformly concave, straight at middle, bristle tufts present only at distal angles (fig. 8); superior processes of dorsal rim produced as a spine......................................................... bicolor Distant
7´. Ventral rim of pygophore bisinuate, triangular projections not surpassing posterolateral angles of pygophore; bristle tufts at distal angles of ventral rim and also over triangular projections; superior processes of dorsal rim spatulate... peruanus Grazia
8. Posterolateral angles of connexivum well developed in acute tubercles; connexivum with darker castaneous punctures, anterolateral angles stained with black; ventral rim of pygophore largely concave, distal angles not projected, with bristle tufts; median bristle tufts of ventral rim absent; capsula seminalis with three teeth......................... punctatus Spinola
8´. Posterolateral angles of connexivum projected in little spines; connexivum with concolorous punctures; ventral rim of pygophore narrowly concave, distal angles projected inward, with bristle tufts; median bristle tufts of ventral rim present; capsula seminalis with two teeth............................................................... leucostigmus (Dallas)
9. Disc of head outlined by darker punctures; humeral angles in a spine just surpassing rhomboid projections of posterolateral margins of pronotum; posterolateral angles of connexivum with conspicuous spines; connexivum with castaneous punctures at apical third of each segment; ventral rim of pygophore projected inward in a narrow flap, sinuate in ventral view, distal angles with thick bristle tufts..................................................................... miriamae Grazia
9’ Disc of head not detached; humeral angles in long spines directed laterad, well surpassing an imaginary line across third connexivum; posterolateral angles of connexivum slighted projected, castaneous or black punctures at inner half of each segment, outer half with concolorous punctures; ventral rim of pygophore uniformly concave or sinuate at middle, with 1+1 triangular projections which surpass the posterolateral angles of pygophore; bristle tufts absent................... nigrum Bergroth
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |