Probles (Probles) bengalensis Khalaim, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.15298/rusentj.31.1.10 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FC9B12-FFFE-FF88-FF68-F99A8DB7F996 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Probles (Probles) bengalensis Khalaim |
status |
sp. nov. |
Probles (Probles) bengalensis Khalaim , sp.n.
Figs 21–28 View Figs 21–24 View Figs 25–28 .
MATERIAL. Holotype: ♀ ( EUM), India, West Bengal, near Darjeeling, Tiger Hill , over 2600 m, 8.V.1980, coll. S. Hisamatsu.
COMPARISON. The new species belongs to the subgenus Probles s. str. as it has the clypeus with a median transverse convexity ( Fig. 22 View Figs 21–24 ) and a long basal part of the propodeum ( Fig. 26 View Figs 25–28 ). Probles bengalensis sp.n. is similar to the European P. flavipes (Szépligeti, 1899) in having an antenna with about 22 flagellomeres, second recurrent vein (2 m-cu) postfurcal, propodeum with a long basal keel ( Fig. 26 View Figs 25–28 ), and first tergite strongly longitudinally striate ( Fig. 24 View Figs 21–24 ), but differs from this species in having polished dorsolateral areas of the propodeum ( Fig. 26 View Figs 25–28 ) (wrinkled in P. flavipes ) and a much longer ovipositor, with the sheath 4.0 times as long as the first tergite ( Fig. 21 View Figs 21–24 ) vs 2.0 times in P. flavipes .
This is the first record of the subgenus Probles s. str. from the Oriental region, as it was known hitherto only from the Nearctic and Western Palaearctic regions.
DESCRIPTION. Female. Body length 4.8 mm. Fore wing length 3.8 mm.
Head, in dorsal view, roundly constricted posterior to eyes ( Fig. 23 View Figs 21–24 ); gena 0.9 times as long as eye width. Eyes with very short sparse setae ( Fig. 22 View Figs 21–24 ). Clypeus 3.2 times as broad as long, in front view lenticular ( Fig. 22 View Figs 21–24 ), convex in upper part, with distinct transverse concavity in lower part; clypeus separated from face by distinct furrow, polished and impunctate in lower 0.6, finely and sparsely punctate in upper 0.4, with weak granulation near upper margin. Mandible robust, weakly tapered in basal half; upper tooth somewhat longer and broader than lower. Malar space 0.7 times as long as basal mandibular width. Antennal flagellum slightly clavate apically, with 22 flagellomeres; subbasal flagellomeres 1.5– 1.6 times as long as broad, median flagellomeres 1.3–1.4 times as long as broad, and subapical flagellomeres as long as broad; flagellomeres 3 to 6 with distinct subapical finger-shaped structures on outer surface ( Fig. 25 View Figs 25–28 ). Face with weak median prominence. Face and frons distinctly granulate, dull, with very indistinct (because of granulation) punctures. Vertex finely punctate, medially finely granulate and dull, laterally nearly smooth and weakly shining. Gena finely punctate on smooth and shining background. Occipital carina complete, arcuate in dorsal view ( Fig. 23 View Figs 21–24 ).
Mesoscutum very finely and densely punctate on finely granulate and dull background, laterally with nearly smooth areas. Notaulus virtually absent, with vestige of wrinkle indicating its path on anterolateral side of mesoscutum ( Fig. 25 View Figs 25–28 ). Scutellum with lateral longitudinal carinae present at its anterior 0.3. Mesopleuron with fine distinct punctures on polished background ( Fig. 24 View Figs 21–24 ). Epicnemial carina with upper end abruptly curved to reach front margin of mesopleuron. Foveate groove moderately broad, deep, weakly upcurved anteriorly, extending over posterior 0.9 of mesopleuron (thus not reaching epicnemial carina anteriorly), with transverse wrinkles ( Fig. 24 View Figs 21–24 ). Propodeal spiracle separated from pleural carina by almost 2.0 times diameter of spiracle ( Fig. 24 View Figs 21–24 ). Propodeum ( Fig. 26 View Figs 25–28 ) polished, with very fine inconspicuous punctures on dorsolateral areas, with weak basal keel which is indistinct anteriorly because of irregular wrinkles; basal keel about 0.7 times as long as apical area; apical area flat, anteriorly narrowly rounded; apical longitudinal carinae complete, reaching transverse carina anteriorly.
Fore wing ( Fig. 21 View Figs 21–24 ) with second recurrent vein (2 m-cu) postfurcal, with unpigmented bulla anteriorly. Intercubitus (2 rs-m) long, slightly thickened, twice longer than abscissa of cubitus between intercubitus and second recurrent vein (abscissa of M between 2 rs-m and 2 m-cu). First abscissa of radius (Rs +2 r) straight, longer than width of pterostigma. First and second abscissae of radius (Rs +2 r and Rs) meeting at right angle. Metacarpus (R 1) not reaching apex of fore wing. Hind wing with nervellus (cu 1& cu-a) subvertical. Legs slender. Tarsal claws long and slender, not pectinate.
First tergite 2.5 times as long as posteriorly broad, slightly depressed, in cross-section centrally trapeziform; tergite strongly longitudinally striate laterally before glymma ( Fig. 24 View Figs 21–24 ) and dorsally in central part, remainder smooth. Glymma distinct, situated in centre of tergite, joining by furrow to ventral part of postpetiole ( Fig. 24 View Figs 21–24 ). Second tergite 1.15 times as long as anteriorly broad ( Fig. 27 View Figs 25–28 ). Thyridial depression distinct, almost twice as long as broad, with posterior end rounded ( Fig. 27 View Figs 25–28 ). Ovipositor very long, evenly bent upwards, with weak dorsal subapical depression ( Fig. 28 View Figs 25–28 ); sheath 4.0 times as long as first tergite ( Fig. 21 View Figs 21–24 ).
Head, mesosoma and first metasomal tergite black; lower half of clypeus brownish yellow. Mouthparts yellow. Mandible brownish yellow, teeth reddish. Antenna black, scape and pedicel yellow-brown. Tegula yellow. Wings slightly infumate with brown. Pterostigma brown. Legs yellowish brown, hind coxa dark brown. Second tergite yellow-brown; third and following tergites brown to dark brown.
Male. Unknown.
ETYMOLOGY. Named after the region where the holotype was collected.
DISTRIBUTION. North India (West Bengal).
Acknowledgements. I am thankful to Kazuhiko Konishi (EUM) for loaning valuable material and to Gavin R. Broad (the Natural History Museum, London, UK) for reviewing this manuscript and linguistic corrections. This work was supported by the State Research Project No. AAAA-A19- 119020690101-6.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.