Hoodothrips Bondar, 1931
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4820.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:340C25FD-6DD4-482F-A5F9-40715B4FA206 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4437205 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FC87D5-FFBB-FFEF-FF1D-DD57FD28F603 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hoodothrips Bondar |
status |
|
Hoodothrips Bondar View in CoL
Currently, this genus comprises three species, of which brevipilus is not recorded but likely present in northern states, close to its type locality. Mound (1970) placed one of these in Hoodothripoides due to the presence of 8segmented antennae, but Mound and Marullo (1996) considered there was little advantage in distinguishing this monotypic genus in view of the many characters shared with the other two species. Thus, members of this genus have the antennae 6- or 8-segmented, with segments III and IV each having a long basal stem and a forked sense cone ( Figs 45, 46 View FIGURES 34–51 ). Abdominal tergite II has numerous recurved microtrichia anterolaterally, and the setae on the fore wing veins are fusiform ( Figs 88, 89 View FIGURES 77–91 ). The known distribution of Hoodothrips species is disjunct in Brazil, with H. constrictus northward and H. lineatus southward (see Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |