Smeringopus rubrotinctus Strand, 1913
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3461.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0704C43A-73D8-4A28-915A-7FF8611C8606 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5256492 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FBB532-FF89-1713-FF6A-0D6C3B2FFE90 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Smeringopus rubrotinctus Strand, 1913 |
status |
|
Smeringopus rubrotinctus Strand, 1913 View in CoL
Figs. 18, 24 View FIGURES 18–27 , 28–29 View FIGURES 28–37 , 38–41 View FIGURES 38–57 , 59–64 View FIGURES 59–64
Smeringopus rubrotinctus Strand 1913: 343–344 View in CoL .
Types. 1♂ 1♀ syntypes from Rwanda, Rugege Forest [=Nyungwe Forest, 2°29’S, 29°15’E], 1800 m a.s.l., 20.viii.1907 (not 1902 as on labels) (H. Schubotz, Expedition Adolf-Friedrich Herzog zu Mecklenburg), in ZMB (9866), examined GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis. Distinguished from similar congeners (other species of the rubrotinctus group) by shapes of procursus and embolus ( Figs. 59–63 View FIGURES 59–64 ); from most (except S. bwindi ) also by deeply indented epigynum ( Figs. 38–41 View FIGURES 38–57 ); from most other congeners by long apophyses on male chelicerae ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 18–27 ; very similar S. ruhiza ).
Male (syntype). Total body length 6.7, carapace width 2.3. Leg 1: 46.5 (11.9 + 0.8 + 12.0 + 18.7 + 3.1), tibia 2: 9.1, tibia 3: 7.3, tibia 4: 9.9; tibia 1 L/d: 50. Habitus similar S. ruhiza (cf. Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18–27 ). Syntype entirely pale; color pattern of male from Burundi: carapace mostly brown with darker margins and large whitish marks beside ocular area, clypeus with barely visible pair of darker lines, sternum dark brown, leg femora and tibiae with dark subdistal rings and light tips, abdomen dorsally with indistinct pattern, ventrally with three dark lines behind gonopore (median line narrow). Distance PME-PME 185 µm, diameter PME 185 µm, distance PME-ALE 125 µm, distance AME-AME 70 µm, diameter AME 135 µm. Ocular area slightly elevated, secondary eyes with indistinct ‘pseudolenses’; deep but small thoracic pit. Chelicerae as in Fig. 24 View FIGURES 18–27 (very similar S. ruhiza ). Palps as in Figs. 28 and 29 View FIGURES 28–37 , coxa with indistinct bulge, trochanter barely modified, femur with deep retrolateral furrow with distinct rim proximally, cymbium without projection near tarsal organ, procursus with distinctive tip with ventral bifid apophysis and whitish prolateral process ( Figs. 59–61 View FIGURES 59–64 ), bulb with relatively simple branched embolus ( Figs. 62, 63 View FIGURES 59–64 ). All hairs missing in syntype; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 2.5%; prolateral trichobothrium present on tibia 1; male from Burundi (legs 1 missing): legs without spines, few vertical hairs, with curved hairs on tibiae and metatarsi 2.
Variation. The male from Burundi is smaller than the syntype (tibia 2: 6.9) but has identical palpal structures and chelicerae.
Female. In general similar to male; tibia 1 in 3 females: 9.3, 10.8, 11.1. Epigynum anterior plate with large indentation ( Figs. 38–40 View FIGURES 38–57 ; very similar S. bwindi ), without pockets; posterior plate simple, not projecting; internal genitalia as in Figs. 41 View FIGURES 38–57 and 64 View FIGURES 59–64 .
Distribution. Known from Rwanda and northern Burundi ( Fig. 58 View FIGURE 58 ).
Material examined. RWANDA: Rugege Forest : 1♂ 1♀ syntypes above. Marais de Mukokola, Forêt de Rugege, 2250 m a.s.l., 11.–17.viii.1949 (Laurent), 2♀ (2 vials) in MRAC (66539, 66572) . Karisimbi [~ 1°35’S, 29°30’E], xi.1907 (Schubotz), forest at 2500 m a.s.l., 1♀ in ZMB (9867). GoogleMaps
BURUNDI: Parc National de la Kibira , Rwegura, Mt. Musumba [~ 2°55’S, 29°31’E], site 2, forest with Hagenia abyssinica, 2100 m a.s.l., 25.vii.2008 (N. Benoit), 1♂ in MRAC (226403) GoogleMaps ; same data, 1♀ in MRAC (226399). GoogleMaps
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Smeringopus rubrotinctus Strand, 1913
HUBER, BERNHARD A. 2012 |
Smeringopus rubrotinctus
Strand, E. 1913: 344 |