Noeza

Evenhuis, Neal L. & Pape, Thomas, 2017, Battling the un-dead: the status of the Diptera genus-group names originally proposed in Johann Wilhelm Meigen’s 1800 pamphlet, Zootaxa 4275 (1), pp. 1-74 : 42-43

37. Noeza

[ Noeza ] Meigen, 1800: 27.

CURRENT STATUS: Unavailable name; work suppressed for the purposes of zoological nomenclature by action of I.C.Z.N. (1963: 339 [Opinion 678]); treated under Hybos Meigen, 1803 [teste Yang et al. (2007: 287)].

[ Noeza ] Bezzi, 1907a: 56.

CURRENT STATUS: Unavailable name; criteria to make the name available not fulfilled in this work. REMARKS: Bezzi (1907a) included this name only in a list of Meigen 1800 names without stating their availability.

Noeza Meigen in Hendel, 1908: 56 .

ORIGINALLY INCLUDED SPECIES: None.

FIRST INCLUDED SPECIES: Musca grossipes Linnaeus, 1758 (in Coquillett 1910a: 576).

TYPE SPECIES: Musca grossipes Linnaeus, 1758 , by subsequent designation ( Coquillett 1910a: 576).

CURRENT STATUS: Preoccupied by Noeza Walker, 1866 ; junior synonym of Hybos Meigen, 1803 . New Synonymy.

FAMILY: HYBOTIDAE .

REMARKS: Noeza was originally proposed by Meigen (1800: 27) without included species and later made unavailable by the suppression of the entire work for the purposes of zoological nomenclature by action of the I.C.Z.N. (1963: 339 [Opinion 678]). Hendel (1908: 56) was the first after Meigen (1800) to give characters to differentiate the taxon (reproducing Meigen’s characters) and to treat Noeza as valid, which makes the name available from that work with Meigen as author. Hendel (1908) did not include any species. Coquillett (1910a: 576) was the first to include a species: Musca grossipes Linnaeus, 1758 , which is the type species by subsequent designation. Musca grossipes Linnaeus, 1758 is currently treated in Hybos Meigen, 1803 [teste Yang et al. (2007: 287)], which makes Noeza Meigen in Hendel, 1908 a junior synonym of Hybos Meigen, 1803 , n. syn.