Uteropolystomoides, Tinsley, 2017

Chaabane, Amira, Preez, Louis Du, Johnston, Gerald & Verneau, Olivier, 2022, Revision of the systematics of the Polystomoidinae (Platyhelminthes, Monogenea, Polystomatidae) with redefinition of Polystomoides Ward, 1917 and Uteropolystomoides Tinsley, 2017, Parasite (Paris, France) 29 (56), pp. 1-19 : 12-13

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1051/parasite/2022056

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:78E47736-5414-4CFC-897D-626DE8130F7D

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12751286

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FB87DA-FF9E-FFD5-1445-9F09FF38535A

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Uteropolystomoides
status

 

Revision of Uteropolystomoides View in CoL outlines

Polystomoides multifalx , originally described as Polystoma multifalx Stunkard, 1924 from the pharyngeal region of Pseudemys floridana from central Florida ( USA), was the first A. Chaabane et al.: Parasite 2022, 29, 56

13 chelonian polystome known to have a huge genital bulb bearing numerous long spines in excess of 100 (120–124) [ 40]. Stunkard [ 40] mentioned that the number of genital spines of this species was three times greater than in any other known polystomes at the time. Based on samples from the mouth of Pseudemys hieroglyphica Boulenger View in CoL (now Pseudemys concinna View in CoL ) from Oklahoma ( USA), Harwood [ 10] distinguished Polystomoides stunkardi Harwood, 1931 View in CoL from P. multifalx View in CoL by the fewer genital spines, the smaller size of the genital bulb and testis, and the arrangement of haptoral suckers. From a morphological comparison between a set of specimens collected by Mr. Macintosh from P. floridana View in CoL from southern Florida and vouchers of P. stunkardi View in CoL from P. concinna View in CoL from Oklahoma, Price [ 36] proposed the conspecificity of P. stunkardi View in CoL with P. multifalx View in CoL . However, Tinsley [ 42] concluded that U. nelsoni View in CoL , P. multifalx View in CoL , and P. stunkardi View in CoL may form a coherent group of apparently related species. Based on morphological observations and measurements of samples collected from P. concinna View in CoL and P. nelsoni View in CoL ( Table 5 View Table 5 ), we were unable to distinguish polystomes collected from both host species. Moreover, the genetic data indicated that polystome samples collected from the three distinct host species, namely P. concinna View in CoL , P. floridana View in CoL , and P. nelsoni View in CoL , belong to the same polystome species. We therefore agree with Price [ 36], and consider that the specimens collected from P. concinna View in CoL from the Ichetucknee River of Florida and those collected from P. nelsoni View in CoL are conspecific with P. multifalx View in CoL . We thus propose to consider a single species, namely Uteropolystomoides multifalx (Stunkard, 1924) View in CoL n. comb. in the genus Uteropolystomoides View in CoL and provide below a supplementary description for the new type species.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF