Anthomyzidae, Czerny

Roháćek, Jindřich & Barber, Kevin N., 2016, Nearctic Anthomyzidae: a monograph of Anthomyza and allied genera (Diptera), Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae (suppl.) 56, pp. 1-412 : 26-28

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4272829

publication LSID

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E95E58A5-E0F1-4237-9D7C-4A81BB3120DD

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4339700

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FB87A9-FFFA-FFA5-FED6-6864FBA4FE90

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Anthomyzidae
status

 

Key to identincation of Nearctic genera of Anthomyzidae View in CoL View at ENA

1 f 1 lacking ctenidial spine posteroventrally, with only a row of long nne setae. .......... 2

– f 1 with distinct (although sometimes short) posteroventral ctenidial spine ( Figs 7 View Figs 7–10 , 51 View Figs 50–53 ) in addition to a row of long setae. ............................................................................... 3

2(1) Wing abbreviated and narrowed or with incomplete venation (at least dm-cu absent, see ROHÁĆEK & BARBER 2005: Figs 183–185 View Figs 176–183 View Figs 184–186 ); maximum eye diameter distinctly oblique. .............................................................................. Stiphrosoma Czerny, 1928 View in CoL , in part

– Wing normal, with complete venation; maximum eye diameter nearly vertical. .......... ...................................................................................................... undescribed genus

3(1) Wing with distinct longitudinal infuscation, especially along R 4+5 ( Figs 49 View Figs 47–49 , 85 View Figs 84–85 ). ...... 4

– Wing hyaline or with only indistinct infumation, never with discrete contrasting markings ( Figs 11 View Fig , 34 View Figs 33–34 ). ............................................................................................... 5

4(3) Head markedly longer than high, depressed and anteriorly angular; eye elongate, with maximum diameter oblique to almost horizontal ( Fig. 47 View Figs 47–49 ); frontal triangle small and narrow, hardly reaching midpoint of frons; f 1 with ctenidial spine small ( Fig. 51 View Figs 50–53 ); gonostylus simple, with 2 denticles on apex ( Fig. 59 View Figs 54–59 ); transandrium with distinctively forked caudal process having its arms projecting and dilated anteroventrally ( Fig. 55 View Figs 54–59 ); postgonite slightly sinuous and without setulae ( Fig. 56 View Figs 54–59 ); spermatheca with eccentric duct insertion ( Fig. 61 View Figs 60–65 ) and spermathecal duct very long. ............................................. ............................ Ischnomyia Loew, 1863 View in CoL [only I. albicosta ( Walker, 1849) View in CoL ] (p. 41)

– Head slightly shorter than high, anteriorly rounded; eye broad, maximum diameter of eye nearly vertical ( Fig. 89 View Figs 86–89 ); frontal triangle large and broad, reaching at least to anterior nfth of frons; f 1 with ctenidial spine long ( Fig. 87 View Figs 86–89 ); gonostylus with attenuated apex but without denticles ( Fig. 91 View Figs 90–97 ); transandrium with caudal process simple ( Fig. 94 View Figs 90–97 ); postgonite sickle-shaped, with distinct anteroproximal setula ( Fig. 92 View Figs 90–97 ); spermatheca with normal duct insertion ( Fig. 99 View Figs 98–105 ) and spermathecal duct short ( Fig. 105 View Figs 98–105 ). .............. ........... Arganthomyza Roháček, 2009 View in CoL , in part [ A. vittipennis ( Walker, 1857) ] (p. 66)

5(3) Maximum diameter of eye nearly vertical ( Fig. 35 View Figs 35–38 ); 3 strong ors, anterior ors subequal to or slightly shorter than middle seta and with additional microsetula in front of anterior ors; subvibrissa reduced ( Fig. 35 View Figs 35–38 ); all femora distinctly variegated brown and yellow; anal nssure very small, narrowly rounded triangular and medandrium abruptly narrowed dorsally ( Fig. 36 View Figs 35–38 ); internal structures of female genital chamber weak, annular sclerite reduced, almost indistinct ( Fig. 45 View Figs 42–46 ). ............................................................ ....... Fungomyza Roháček, 1999 View in CoL [only F. buccata Roháček & Barber, 2004 View in CoL )] (p. 30)

– Maximum eye diameter more or less oblique; 1–3 strong ors, if 3 ors then the anterior distinctly shorter; 0–2 microsetulae in front of anterior ors; subvibrissa more or less distinct (longer than anterior peristomal setula); femora usually unicolourous (yellow or ochreous-orange), sometimes partly ochreous-brown; anal nssure larger and medandrium different; internal structures of female genital chamber usually well sclerotized and annular sclerite well developed. ........................................................................... 6

6(5) A single long ors (see VOCKEROTH 1987: Fig. 75.2 View Figs 70–76 ), at most with a small microsetula anterior to this (no more than one-eighth length of ors); frontal triangle large and shining black. .............................................................................................................. 7

– At least 2 ors long (if two, the anterior at least one-third length of posterior ors and with additional short anterior microsetula present) ( Figs 1 View Fig , 6 View Figs 4–6 ; ROHÁĆEK & BARBER 2011: Fig. 11 View Fig ); frontal triangle rarely shining black. .................................................................... 8

7(6) Fore legs unicolourous yellow to pale brown; silvery white tomentum above occipital foramen in a single medial patch; 1st antennal nagellomere nearly orbicular, with apex rounded; longest aristal hairs shorter than half width of 1st nagellomere; postgena with pale ventral border connuent with pale gena; palpus entirely pale; female abdomen entirely brown or sometimes slightly pale lateral to midline; T7 not divided medially. ............................. Mumetopia Melander, 1913 View in CoL [only M. occipitalis Melander, 1913 View in CoL ]

– t 1 and basal tarsal segments black with apical segments white; no white tomentum above occipital foramen; 1st antennal nagellomere longer than wide, apically obliquely rounded; longest aristal hairs as long as width of 1st nagellomere; postgena entirely dark, contrasting with pale gena; palpus apically darkened; female T2–T5 usually contrastingly pale with medial brown stripe; T7 longitudinally medially divided. ............................. ......................... undescribed genus [only Mumetopia nigrimana ( Coquillett, 1900) View in CoL ]

8(6) Wing generally shorter than body length (sometimes much shorter), cross-vein r-m arising in basal third of dm cell; arista distinctly (shortly to long) pectinate ( ROHÁĆEK & BARBER 2005: Figs 1 View Fig , 32 View Figs 28–32 , 42 View Figs 42–46 ); prs usually small or absent; female T7+S7 dorsomedially divided or unpigmented ( ROHÁĆEK & BARBER 2005: Figs 13 View Figs 12–14 , 27 View Figs 24–27 ); annular sclerite in female genital chamber strongly transversely compressed (ROHÁĆEK & ABER 2005: Figs 31 View Figs 28–32 , 179 View Figs 176–183 ); spermathecae pyriform with entire surface strongly spinose ( ROHÁĆEK & BARBER 2005: Figs 17 View Figs 15–17 , 46 View Figs 42–46 , 80 View Figs 77–83 ). ........ Stiphrosoma Czerny, 1928 View in CoL , in part

– Wing generally longer than body length; cross-vein r-m arising beyond basal third towards the middle of dm cell; arista ciliate ( Figs 6 View Figs 4–6 , 35 View Figs 35–38 , 395 View Figs 392–395 ; ROHÁĆEK & BARBER 2011: 12); prs present and usually long; female T7+S7 dorsomedially undivided, but if unpigmented, then spermathecae not spinose on entire surface and annular sclerite not transversely compressed. ............................................................................................ 9

9(8) Contrasting silvery grey tomentose stripes present between frontal triangle and posterior part of orbits and join broadly across the front of the frontal triangle leaving only the ocellar triangle shiny; nlum of distiphallus slender and formed by two ribbon-shaped sclerites (see ROHÁĆEK 2006a: Figs 502, 505 View Figs 501–507 , as Paranthomyza caricis View in CoL ); spermatheca spherical to subspherical with only sparse tubercles or spines and without striations or apical invagination (see ROHÁĆEK 2006a: Fig 510 View Figs 508–515 ). ......... Carexomyza Roháček, 2009 View in CoL

– Contrasting silvery grey tomentose stripes between frontal triangle and posterior part of orbits either absent, or if present then short and not joining anteriorly; nlum of distiphallus of various composition; spermatheca of various shape and vestiture usually with at least incomplete striations ( Figs 117 View Figs 117–124 , 215 View Figs 215–221 , 288 View Figs 287–293 , 480 View Figs 474–480 ), but if without striations then with apical invagination ( Figs 267 View Figs 267–273 , 399 View Figs 396–400 , 540 View Figs 536–543 ) or irregularly pyriform to spindleshaped ( ROHÁĆEK & BARBER 2011: Figs 26 View Figs 24–27 , 119 View Figs 117–124 ). ..................................................... 10

10(9) Body shiny black, sparsely tomentose ( ROHÁĆEK & BARBER 2011: Fig. 10 View Figs 7–10 ); two strong ors with additional microsetula anterior to these no stronger than the medial frontal microsetulae; face of female darker than that of male ( ROHÁĆEK & BARBER 2011: Figs 8, 9 View Figs 7–10 ); male gonostylus deeply bilobed ( ROHÁĆEK & BARBER 2011: Figs 13 View Figs 12–14 , 15 View Figs 15–17 ); nlum of distiphallus formed by two very slender ribbon-shaped sclerites, apically simple ( ROHÁĆEK & BARBER 2011: Fig. 18 View Figs 18–23 ); female T7+S7 dorsomedially divided but S8 not divided ( ROHÁĆEK & BARBER 2011: Figs 23 View Figs 18–23 , 24 View Figs 24–27 ); spermatheca elongately spindle-shaped with distal end rugged and provided with small blunt processes, never apically invaginated ( ROHÁĆEK & BARBER 2011: Figs 26 View Figs 24–27 , 119 View Figs 117–124 ). ........... Quametopia Roháček & Barber, 2011 View in CoL

– Body ranging from yellow to shiny brown or black, with sparse to dense grey tomentum; 2 or 3 strong ors, if only 2 strong ors then additional microsetula anterior to these may be as strong as or stronger than the medial frontal microsetulae; face of female never darker than that of male but the reverse may occur; male gonostylus never bilobed; nlum of distiphallus of various construction but if composed of 2 (partly fused) sclerites they are thicker and terminate in distinctly dilated apex ( Figs 155 View Figs 150–156 , 174 View Figs 168–175 ); female T7+S7 not divided dorsally but S8 longitudinally divided ( Figs 79 View Figs 77–83 , 178 View Figs 176–183 , 253 View Figs 249–255 , 393 View Figs 392–395 , 475 View Figs 474–480 ); spermatheca distally simple, often apically invaginated. ................................ 11

11(9) Only 2 strong ors with additional microsetula anterior to these usually weaker (only very rarely stronger) than medial frontal microsetulae; contrasting silvery grey tomentose stripes present between frontal triangle and posterior part of orbits; if lower part of thoracic pleurae yellow and contrasting with the dark notum ( A. duplex , Figs 146, 147 View Figs 146–149 ) then gonostylus narrowing toward apex ( Fig. 156 View Figs 150–156 ) and female with S7 fused with T7 to form syntergosternum ( Fig. 159 View Figs 157–163 ); thorax never with dense grey tomentum; males always with short thickened ventral setae in distal part of f 3; nlum of distiphallus formed by two thicker, more or less fused sclerites, apically dilated and complex and saccus at most with small rounded tubercles (( Figs 75 View Figs 70–76 , 135 View Figs 131–135 , 174 View Figs 168–175 ); spermathecal ducts short ( Figs 80 View Figs 77–83 , 124 View Figs 117–124 , 199 View Figs 195–202 ). ....................................... Arganthomyza Roháček, 2009 View in CoL , in part (p. 56)

– Two or 3 strong ors, if only 2 strong ors then additional microsetula anterior to these always stronger than medial frontal microsetulae; contrasting silvery grey tomentose stripes usually absent between frontal triangle and posterior part of orbits, these stripes present only when at least lower half of thoracic pleurae is yellow and contrasting with brown notum ( A. macra View in CoL group, Figs 205, 206 View Figs 203–206 ) where gonostylus is broad and spatulate ( Figs 208 View Figs 207–214 , 231 View Figs 225–231 ) and the female S7 is separate from T7 ( Fig. 238 View Figs 232–238 ); thorax often with dense grey microtomentum; males with or without modined ventral setae in distal part of f 3; nlum of distiphallus formed by single sclerite, apically simple and saccus with (usually robust) spines ( Figs 212 View Figs 207–214 , 285 View Figs 280–286 , 390 View Figs 385–391 , 465 View Figs 460–466 , 556 View Figs 551–559 ); spermathecal ducts very long (3 times or more as long as those in Fig. 199 View Figs 195–202 ). ........... Anthomyza Fallén, 1810 View in CoL (p. 105)

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Anthomyzidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF