Anthomyza neglecta, Collin, 1944
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4272829 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E95E58A5-E0F1-4237-9D7C-4A81BB3120DD |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4339670 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FB87A9-FF0F-FF6F-FE11-6946FBA5FCD0 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Anthomyza neglecta |
status |
|
The Anthomyza neglecta View in CoL group
The Anthomyza neglecta View in CoL group was established by ROHÁĆEK (2006a, 2009a) for three Palaearctic species, viz. A. neglecta Collin, 1944 View in CoL , A. paraneglecta Elberg, 1968 View in CoL and A. orineglecta Roháček, 2006 View in CoL . In the Nearctic Region, four additional species belonging to this group have been found, including Anthomyza variegata ( Loew, 1863) View in CoL and three new species described below, viz. A. dichroa View in CoL sp. nov., A. gibbiger View in CoL sp. nov. and A. orthogibbus View in CoL sp. nov. However, although all the above-named species are distinctly related, the inclusion of the Nearctic species required redennition of the taxonomic limits of the A. neglecta View in CoL group, because not all added species share all characters used by ROHÁĆEK (2006a: 129) to diagnose the group. The expanded A. neglecta View in CoL group can be best diagnosed by the following (most of them obviously apomorphic) characters: (1) white pilosity of the 1st antennal nagellomere long; (2) pregonite simplined and with a very reduced posterior process; (3) postgonite usually with 1 lateral seta; (4) saccus of distiphallus shortened; (5) nlum robust, not attenuated apically but ending in a curved digitiform terminal process; (6) female T7+S7 forming a compact conical sclerite with anterolateroventral (often pouch-like) lobes; (7) annular sclerite in female genital chamber small and asymmetrically bent; (8) spermathecae with shallow terminal impression.
The A. neglecta View in CoL group was also connrmed as monophyletic (although with only European species included) by analyses of molecular data (ROHÁĆEK et al. 2009; ROHÁĆEK & TÓTHOVÁ 2014). Its relationship to other groups of Anthomyza View in CoL has not been recognized with certainty. Two separate analyses of morphological ( ROHÁĆEK 2009a: Fig. 141 View Figs 139–145 ) and molecular data (ROHÁĆEK et al. 2009: Fig. 2 View Figs 2–3 ) placed it as a sister group to an E. Palaearctic clade including A. ssavosterna Sueyoshi & Roháček, 2003 and the sister pair A. bellatrix Roháček, 1984 View in CoL + A. trifurca Sueyoshi & Roháček, 2003 View in CoL , while the molecular analysis of ROHÁĆEK & TÓTHOVÁ (2014: Fig. 1 View Fig ) postulated it to have a common ancestor with the A. collini View in CoL group.
Inasmuch as three of the Nearctic species ( A. variegata View in CoL , A. gibbiger View in CoL , A. orthogibbus View in CoL ) have relatively simple, nat and not or weakly medially bent gonostyli (plesiomorphic, those of A. variegata View in CoL of the most ancestral type), it is possible that all Palaearctic species ( A. neglecta View in CoL , A. paraneglecta View in CoL , A. orineglecta View in CoL ) which have strongly curved gonostyli could be derived later and probably from the ancestor of the A. variegata View in CoL + A. dichroa View in CoL sister pair (probable synapomorphies: very long ciliation of 1st nagellomere; 1 pair of internal sclerites in female genital chamber). They (together with A. variegata View in CoL and A. dichroa View in CoL ) also lack the distinctive synapomorphies of the other Nearctic sister pair ( A. gibbiger View in CoL + A. orthogibbus View in CoL ), see below.
Another hypothesis (preferred here) presupposes that all four Nearctic species are derived from a common ancestor (possible synapomorphies: aedeagal part of folding apparatus with armature reduced to small tubercles; female T7+S7 dorsomedially shortened and weakened to interrupted; internal sclerites of female genital chamber weakly sclerotized) so forming the sister group to a branch with Palaearctic species ( A. neglecta , A. paraneglecta , A. orineglecta ). The latter three species can be clustered on the basis of the following synapomorphies: caudal process of transandrium with spinulae reduced and female genital chamber with annular sclerite situated ventrally under the paired internal sclerites.
Key to identincation of the Nearctic species of the Anthomyza neglecta group
1 Antenna with strikingly long ciliation of 1st nagellomere ( Fig. 395 View Figs 392–395 ). Head about as long as high and eyes more broadly ovoid ( Figs 381 View Figs 381–384 , 404 View Figs 401–405 ). Wing broader ( Figs 437, 438 View Figs 437–440 ). Caudal process of transandrium (simple dorsally) and basal membrane densely prickly spinulose ( Figs 387, 388 View Figs 385–391 ). Female T7+S7 dorsally posteromedially membranous, with posterior dark stripe interrupted in the middle ( Figs 394 View Figs 392–395 , 413 View Figs 413–418 ). ............... 2
– Antenna with somewhat shorter ciliation of 1st nagellomere. Head distinctly longer than high and eyes more elongately ovoid ( Figs 383 View Figs 381–384 , 420 View Figs 419–421 ). Wing narrower ( Figs 439, 440 View Figs 437–440 ). Caudal process of transandrium with peculiar dorsal hump-like projection and basal membrane shortly spinulose ( Figs 423, 425, 426 View Figs 422–429 ). Female T7+S7 dorsally complete, with posterior dark stripe continuous ( Figs 431 View Figs 430–436 , 450 View Figs 449–455 ). .............................. 3
2(1) Arista long ciliate ( Fig. 395 View Figs 392–395 ). Scutellum often with 1–3 small erect setulae between apical sc ( Fig. 398 View Figs 396–400 ). Gonostylus ( Figs 391 View Figs 385–391 , 400 View Figs 396–400 ) nat, of elongately oval outline, micropubescent on most of its outer side. Medandrium dorsally narrowed and with distinct corners ( Fig. 385 View Figs 385–391 ). Female T7+S7 larger, dorsally very shortened and dorsomedially membranous (interrupted, Fig. 394 View Figs 392–395 ), ventrally without anterior ledge-like stripe ( Fig. 393 View Figs 392–395 ), and with large pouch-like anteroventrolateral lobes and brown posterior dorsolateral band larger ( Fig. 392 View Figs 392–395 ). ............................................ A. variegata ( Loew, 1863) View in CoL
– Arista with cilia shorter. Scutellum always without additional setulae between apical sc. Gonostylus slender and strongly curved medially ( Fig. 406 View Figs 406–412 ), with micropubescence on outer side reduced ( Fig. 412 View Figs 406–412 ). Medandrium dorsally broad and with corners rounded ( Fig. 406 View Figs 406–412 ). Female T7+S7 smaller, dorsomedially only posteriorly membranous (interrupted, Fig. 413 View Figs 413–418 ), with pouch-like anteroventrolateral lobes smaller but ventrally with distinct anterior transverse ledge-like stripe ( Fig. 415 View Figs 413–418 ) and brown posterior dorsolateral band smaller ( Fig. 413 View Figs 413–418 ). ...................................................... A. dichroa View in CoL sp. nov.
3(2) Male with ctenidial spine on f 1 long, markedly longer than maximum width of t 1. Gonostylus short and broad, posteroproximally dilated and with apex truncate ( Fig. 429 View Figs 422–429 ). Female 1st nagellomere entirely yellow or with outer side brownish-darkened. Female T7+S7, in lateral view, shorter, projecting anteroventrally and with more or less distinct ventral dome-like bulge ( Fig. 431a View Figs 430–436 , arrows); T6 sometimes without posterior dark stripe or with only faint darkening ( Fig. 431 View Figs 430–436 ); posterior stripes tending to become less distinct on more anterior tergites; T7+S7 usually with posterior dark stripe shorter and T8 short ( Fig. 431 View Figs 430–436 ). ............................................................................ A. gibbiger View in CoL sp. nov.
– Male with ctenidial spine small, as long as or shorter than maximum width of t 1. Gonostylus elongate, narrow, gradually tapered towards bidentate apex ( Fig. 448 View Figs 441–448 ). Female 1st nagellomere always with outer side brownish-darkened. Female T7+S7, in lateral view, longer, projecting more angularly anteromedially and not bulging ventrally ( Fig. 450a View Figs 449–455 , arrows); T6 always with posterior dark stripe distinct ( Fig. 450 View Figs 449–455 ); posterior stripes often remaining strong on all tergites; T7+S7 usually with posterior dark stripe longer and T8 long ( Fig. 450 View Figs 449–455 ). ........................................................... A. orthogibbus View in CoL sp. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Anthomyza neglecta
Roháćek, Jindřich & Barber, Kevin N. 2016 |
A. dichroa
Roháćek & Barber 2016 |
A. gibbiger
Roháćek & Barber 2016 |
A. orthogibbus
Roháćek & Barber 2016 |
A. gibbiger
Roháćek & Barber 2016 |
A. orthogibbus
Roháćek & Barber 2016 |
A. dichroa
Roháćek & Barber 2016 |
A. dichroa
Roháćek & Barber 2016 |
A. gibbiger
Roháćek & Barber 2016 |
A. orthogibbus
Roháćek & Barber 2016 |
A. orineglecta Roháček, 2006
Rohacek 2006 |
A. orineglecta
Rohacek 2006 |
A. ssavosterna Sueyoshi & Roháček, 2003
Sueyoshi & Rohacek 2003 |
A. trifurca Sueyoshi & Roháček, 2003
Sueyoshi & Rohacek 2003 |
A. bellatrix Roháček, 1984
Rohacek 1984 |
A. collini
Andersson 1976 |
A. paraneglecta
Elberg 1968 |
A. paraneglecta
Elberg 1968 |
Anthomyza neglecta
Collin 1944 |
A. neglecta
Collin 1944 |
A. neglecta
Collin 1944 |
A. neglecta
Collin 1944 |
A. neglecta
Collin 1944 |
A. neglecta
Collin 1944 |
Anthomyza
Fallen 1810 |