Calliopiidae, G. O. Sars, 1893
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.693 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0ACF3BB2-8DF5-43AE-ADF9-75345D94D5B8 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4328061 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FB522D-FFE3-1D5B-6298-0632FAB754E8 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Calliopiidae |
status |
|
Identification key to genera of the Calliopiidae View in CoL
Key based on original or amended descriptions of genera and adapted from previous keys given by Barnard (1964), Barnard & Karaman (1991) and Bousfield & Hendrycks (1997). All genera included in this key are according to Lowry & Myers (2013) and WoRMS (2020).
1. Mandibular molar not triturative, usually conical ............................................................................ 2
– Mandibular molar triturative, columnar, rather conical .................................................................... 3
2. Carpus of gnathopods 1–2 shorter than propodus, weakly lobed; antenna 2 elongate ....................... ............................................................................................................... Harpinioides Stebbing, 1888 View in CoL
– Carpus of gnathopods 1–2 as long as propodus, unlobed; antenna 1 elongate ................................... .............................................................................................................. Calliopiurus Bushueva, 1986 View in CoL
3. Inner plate of maxilla 2 much broader than outer plate .................... Pontogeneoides Nicholls, 1938 View in CoL
– Inner plate of maxilla 2 not much broader than outer plate .............................................................. 4
4. Coxae very short and progressively longer towards coxa 7 ............................................................. 5
– Coxae not as greatly shortened and not progressively lengthened towards coxa 7 .......................... 6
5. Carpus and propodus of pereopods 6–7 extremely elongate (planktonic); body carinate; coxa 1 not or scarcely produced anteriorly ........................... Stenopleuroides Birstein & M. Vinogradov, 1964 View in CoL
– Carpus and propodus of pereopods 6–7 not extremely elongate; body smooth; coxa 1 produced anteriorly................................................................................................. Stenopleura Stebbing, 1888 View in CoL
6. Palp of maxilla 1 reduced, not exceeding apex of outer plate, article 1 longer than article 2............. ......................................................................................................................... Laothoes Boeck, 1871 View in CoL
– Palp of maxilla 1 ordinary, article 1 shorter than article 2 ................................................................ 7
7. Rami of uropods 1–2 without marginal robust setae, only with distal robust setae ........................... ........................................................................................................... Calliopiella Schellenberg, 1925 View in CoL
– Rami of uropods 1–2 with both marginal and distal robust setae ..................................................... 8
8. Gnathopods 2 very slender, linear, carpus very slender and elongate, unlobed, propodus generally elongate and linear (except in Amphithopsis View in CoL ) ................................................................................... 9
– Gnathopod 2 not very slender nor linear nor greatly elongate (propodus not especially elongate) .... ......................................................................................................................................................... 18
9. Gnathopod 1 ordinary, neither linear nor elongate ......................................................................... 10
– Gnathopod 1 linear, elongate .......................................................................................................... 12
10. Propodus of gnathopod 2 not linear; dactylus of pereopods 3–7 serrated .......................................... .................................................................................................................. Amphithopsis Boeck, 1861 View in CoL
– Propodus of gnathopod 2 linear; dactylus of pereopod 3–7 not serrated ........................................11
11. Accessory flagellum absent; lower lip with inner lobe absent .............. Bouvierella Chevreux, 1900 View in CoL
– Accessory flagellum present; lower lip with inner lobe present ................... Oradarea Walker, 1903 View in CoL
12. Dactylus of pereopods 3–7 with one or more superior robust setae ............. Cleippides Boeck, 1871 View in CoL
– Dactylus of pereopods 3–7 without superior robust setae .............................................................. 13
13. Carpus of gnathopods 1–2 much longer than propodus ................................................................. 16
– Carpus of gnathopods 1–2 scarcely longer and usually shorter than propodus .............................. 14
14. Gnathopod 2 much longer than gnathopod 1, carpus and propodus extremely slender like that of pereopod 3–7 ................................................................................... Leptamphopus G.O. Sars, 1893 View in CoL
– Gnathopod 2 as long as or slightly longer than ganthopod 1, carpus and propodus normal .......... 15
15. Telson entire, linguiform .................................................... Membrilopus Barnard & Karaman, 1987 View in CoL
– Telson with shallow apical notch on distal margin .................... Frigora Ren in Ren & Huang, 1991 View in CoL
16. Antennae calceolate; antenna 1, peduncular article 3 with posterodistal process; uropod3, rami margin only with simple setae ....................................................................... Halirages Boeck, 1871 View in CoL
– Antennae usually lacking calceoli; antenna 1, peduncular article 3 unmodified; uropod 3, margins with robust setae and inner marginal setae only ............................................................................. 17
17. Propodus of gnathopods expanded; pereopods 5–7 elongated ........... Haliragoides G.O. Sars, 1893 View in CoL
– Propodus of gnathopods not expanded; pereopods 5–7 normal, not extremely elongated ................ ....................................................................................................................... Apherusa Walker, 1891 View in CoL
18. Peduncular article 3 of antenna 1 produced apicoventrally ............................................................ 19
– Peduncular article 3 of antenna 1 not or weakly produced apicoventrally ..................................... 21
19. Carpus on either of gnathopods 1–2 much shorter than propodus ................................................. 20
– Carpus on either of gnathopods 1–2 scarcely shorter than or longer than propodus .......................... ..................................................................................................................... Lopyastis Thurston, 1974 View in CoL
20. Carpus of gnathopods not lobate ................................................................ Tylosapis Thurston, 1974 View in CoL
– Carpus of gnathopods strongly lobate ..................................................... Calliopius Lilljeborg, 1865 View in CoL
21. Epimeron 3 serrate .......................................................................................................................... 22
– Epimeron 3 smooth ......................................................................................................................... 23
22. Accessory flagellum well developed, 3+ articulate ............................... Weygrechita Stuxberg, 1880
– Accessory flagellum scale-like ............................................................... Oligochinus Barnard, 1969 View in CoL
23. Rostrum small ................................................................................................................................. 24
– Rostrum large .................................................................................................................................. 27
24. Accessory flagellum absent ............................................................................................................ 25
– Accessory flagellum 1-articulate, scale-like ........ Paracalliopiella Tzvetkova & Kudrjaschov, 1975 View in CoL
25. Gnathopod 1 larger in size than gnathopod 2 .................... Whangarusa Barnard & Karaman, 1987
– Gnathopod 1 similar in size to gnathopod 2 ................................................................................... 26
26. Carpus of gnathopods 1–2 much shorter than propodus; outer ramus of uropod 3 ½ length of inner ramus; telson longer than broad, entire .................................................................... Bathya View in CoL gen. nov.
– Carpus of gnathopods 1–2 subequal to propodus; rami of uropod 3 subequal in length; telson broader than long, emarginated ............................................... Lutriwita Lowry & Myers, 2012 View in CoL (fresh water)
27. Dactylus of pereopods 3–7 bifid ...................................... Manerogeneia Barnard & Karaman, 1987 View in CoL
– Dactylus of pereopods 3–7 pectinate ......................................... Metaleptamphopus Chevreux, 1911 View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |