Philanthus schulthessi Maidl, 1924
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5249.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:52C66599-6FC8-4A2D-BEA4-8D1CAC33EEE6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7688505 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F95931-6307-4269-288F-FA4BFCA6FE89 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Philanthus schulthessi Maidl, 1924 |
status |
|
Philanthus schulthessi Maidl, 1924 View in CoL
Figs 15A–C View FIGURE 15 , 16A, B View FIGURE 16 , 17A–D View FIGURE 17
Philanthus schulthessi Maidl, 1924: 242 View in CoL , ♀.
Diagnosis. Body length 11–13.5 mm (female).
Greatly resembles female of P. minor , but differs from that species in having the body punctures conspicuously denser ( Figs 15A–C View FIGURE 15 , 16A, B View FIGURE 16 , 17A–D View FIGURE 17 ); metapleuron densely pilose (inconspicuous in P. minor ) ( Fig. 16A View FIGURE 16 ); colour pattern of gaster ( Fig. 16C View FIGURE 16 , 17B View FIGURE 17 ); antenna whitish basally and pale reddish at the rest ( Figs 15B View FIGURE 15 , 17B View FIGURE 17 ) (basal segments yellowish and the rest of flagellum black in P. minor ( Fig. 9C View FIGURE 9 )); gastral terga with conspicuously denser punctures, interspaces smaller than puncture diameter, thus appearing dull ( Figs 16C View FIGURE 16 , 17B View FIGURE 17 ) (less dense, with larger interspaces and shiny in P. minor ( Fig. 9A View FIGURE 9 )).
Material examined: 1♀, Marsa Matruh, 15.ix.1957, Aly collector ( ASUA) ; 1♀, Marsa Matruh, vii.1952, Dr. T. S. collector ( ASUA) ; 1♀, Marsa Matruh, 20.viii.1955, Aly collector ( ASUA) (all were mistakenly identified as P. minor ); a photograph from the OÖLM : 1♀, Marsa Matruh, 22–29.viii.1954 , collector? (det. W.J. Pulawski, 1978).
Previous Egyptian records: Marsa Matruh ( Dollfuss 2017; present study).
Extralimital distribution: Chad, Libya Mauritania, Sudan.
Remarks. In his Mauritanian paper, de Beaumont (1953) has mistakenly identified P. schulthessi as P. minor . However, because of some differences between the specimens examined by him and the true minor (the ocelloocular distance; the degree of emargination of pronotum; the dense punctures; and the colour of gastral T 1 and T 2) he treated it as a subspecies of P. minor . In 1956, comparing his Mauritanian specimens with schulthessi from Wadi Wour (an island near Khartoum, Sudan), he found them conspecific, and thus he corrected the Mauritanian minor subsp. of 1953 to be P. schulthessi .
The specimens examined from the ASUA collection were identified as P. minor , by comparing them with the photos of P. schulthessi received from OÖLM, they were found to be conspecific. Their characters also agree well with the Libyan specimen of de Beaumont’s P. schulthessi (1956:184) and to a large extent with figs 15, 16 ( de Beaumont, 1956:184). All specimens under study as well as that photographed by OÖLM were collected from Marsa Matruh between May and September (1952–1957).
ASUA |
Ain Shams University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Philanthus schulthessi Maidl, 1924
Malash, Alyaa A., Edmardash, Yusuf A. & Gadallah, Neveen S. 2023 |
Philanthus schulthessi
Maidl, F. 1924: 242 |