Eucyon sp.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5381420 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F7DB5D-2909-FFED-8D17-FAC66283FEC2 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Eucyon sp. |
status |
|
Canis ex gr. lepophagus from Kuruksay – Sotnikova 1989.
LOCALITY. — Kuruksay ( Kazakhstan).
AGE. — Late Pliocene (MN17).
Two mandibular fragments from Kuruksay ( Kazakhstan; MN17) were described by Sotnikova (1989) as Canis ex gr. lepophagus. The material was excavated from the type locality of “ Canis ” kuruksaensis Sotnikova, 1989 . This led Rook (1993) to suggest the inclusion of these mandibles in the latter species. The relationships of these mandibles to the skull of “ Canis ” kuruksaensis (a dog that should be included in the genus Eucyon according to R. H. Tedford [pers. comm. in Spassov & Rook 2007]) are not yet clarified. In the original description ( Sotnikova 1989; description published well before the naming of the genus Eucyon ) the mandibular diagnostic features separating Canis from the later described Eucyon are not discussed. In any case, the material is in a very bad state of preservation and a definite decision regarding their taxonomic status will be a difficult task (Spassov & Rook 2007).
AFRICA
Recognition of the occurrence of the genus Eucyon in the fossil record of the African continent has been fully acknowledged only in very recent years. Rook (1993) reported that the occurrence of different Eucyon species was possibly identifiable also in one latest Miocene and one early Pliocene site in Africa: 1) the latest Miocene of E Quarry at Langebaanweg ( South Africa; Fig. 1 View FIG ), from where Hendey (1974, 1978, 1981) described some remains (among which an almost complete cranium and mandibles) as Vulpes sp. and as “gen. et sp. not det. (?aff. Canis brevirostris )”; 2) various sites at Laetoli (early Pliocene, Tanzania; Fig.2 View FIG ), from where Barry (1987) referred to as “new genus?, aff. Canis brevirostris ” a number of fragmentary remains.
Rook (1993) revised the material and hypothesized that both Langebaanweg and Laetoli fossil canids could represent the occurrence of the genus Eucyon in Africa (the Langebaanweg form being very primitive). An opinion that was supported by Werdelin & Lewis (2000), at least for the material from Laetoli referred by Barry(1987) to “new genus?, aff. Canis brevirostris ”. As a matter of fact however, a proper taxonomic identification of these fossils needs further work.
A further occurrence of Eucyon in Africa is at the late Pliocene site of Ahl Al Oughlam in Morocco. There Geraads (1997) described a few remains of Canis n. sp., aff. C. aureus Linnaeus, 1758 . The material, whose morphology resembles Eucyon , was recently maintained within the genus Canis by Geraads (2008).
It is only in very recent years that new material has been described from fossil sites in the latest Miocene of Kenya (Kapsomin and Lemudong’o) and early Pliocene of Ethiopia (Aramis).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.