Atrichobrunettia
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.178550 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6249913 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F65E07-3460-4C6F-DFFF-FA21FA1D8E9E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Atrichobrunettia |
status |
|
Key to males of Neotropical species of the genus Atrichobrunettia View in CoL View at ENA .
1. Scape 3.0x the length of the pedicel; parameres stout, plate-like 2.0x the width of the base of gonostylus, with apical margin straight; post-hypandrial plate narrow ......................................................................... 2
– Scape 1.0x–2.0x the length of the pedicel; parameres triangular or, if plate-like, 1.0x–1.3x the width of the base of gonostylus, and with apical margin dentate; post-hypandrial plate very wide except in Atrichobrunettia bistria Quate View in CoL and Atrichobrunettia spinata Bravo View in CoL where it is narrow ............................................. 3
2. Aedeagal apodeme ending behind gonocoxal bridge ........................................................ A. pennata View in CoL Bravo
– Aedeagal apodeme ending before gonocoxal bridge........................................................... A. bora (Bravo) View in CoL
3. Eye bridge contiguous, wide, 1/ 3x the length of the head; R5 ending after the apex of the wing; gonocoxal apodemes not fused; post-hypandrial plate with apical alveoli; new subgenus Pachybrunettia ................ 4
– Eye bridge separated, narrow 1/ 4x – 1/ 5x the length of the head; R5 ending at apex of the wing; gonocoxal apodemes fused forming a gonocoxal bridge; post-hypandrial plate without alveoli; subgenus Polibrunettia Bravo ..................................................................................................................................................... 6
4. Radial fork apical to medial fork; the distance AB between the hypandrium and the gonocoxal apodeme is 1.5x – 2.0x the length of the paramere ........................................................................................................ 5
– Medial fork apical to radial fork; the distance AB between the hypandrium and the gonocoxal apodeme is 0.5x –0.7x the length of the paramere the length of the paramere .......................... A. triangularis View in CoL sp. nov.
5. Apex of sternite 10 with two lateral lobes; foramen of epandrium small ..................... A. trilobata View in CoL sp. nov.
– Apex of sternite 10 without lateral lobes; foramen of epandrium large ............................. A. minuta View in CoL Bravo
6. Parameres rectangular, or sub-rectangular with internal lobe digitiform and acute at apex ....................... 7
– Parameres triangular ................................................................................................................................. 11
7. Paramere rectangular with denticulate apical margin; apex of aedeagus ending in forceps-like structure with shafts of aedeagus separated and curved inward to meet on the midline .................... A. bistria View in CoL Quate
– Parameres sub-rectangular with internal lobe digitiform and acute apex; aedeagus shafts parallel; ampla View in CoL group ........................................................................................................................................................... 8
8. Aedeagal apodeme narrow, as wide as gonocoxite; lateral margins of aedeagal apodeme parallel, and basal margin rounded ................................................................................................. A. amazonensis View in CoL Bravo
– Aedeagal apodeme trapezoidal with apical margin smaller than basal margin; its greatest width is wider than the gonocoxite ..................................................................................................................................... 9
9. Aedeagal apodeme ending well behind the posterior margin of the gonocoxal bridge ....... A. ampla View in CoL Bravo
– Aedeagal apodeme ending at or slightly behind the posterior margin of the gonocoxal bridge .............. 10
10. Aedeagal apodeme ending at the same level, or slightly before, the posterior margin of the gonocoxal bridge; medial fork apical to the radial fork ............................................................... A. paranaensis View in CoL Bravo
– Aedeagal apodeme slightly behind the gonocoxal apodeme; radial fork apical to the medial fork ............. ............................................................................................................................................ A. spinata View in CoL Bravo
11. Parameres larger than the aedeagal shafts; aedeagal apodeme narrow, filiform; longipenis View in CoL group ......... 12
– Parameres smaller than the aedeagal shafts; aedeagal apodeme wide, having the same or greater width than the widest part of the gonocoxite; bispinata View in CoL group............................................................................ 13
12. Parameres with parallel arms; posterior margin of post-hypandrial plate with inverted U-shape invagina- tion; aedeagus ending before posterior margin of the post-hypandrial plate .................... A. angelae View in CoL Bravo
– Parameres with divergent arms; posterior margin of the post-hypandrial plate straight; aedeagus ending after the posterior margin of the post-hypandrial plate ................................................. A. longipenis View in CoL Bravo
13. Aedeagal apodeme short, ending at the same level as the posterior margin of the gonocoxal bridge; post- hypandrial plate partially covering aedeagus shaft ...................................................... A. brevicornis View in CoL Bravo
– Aedeagal apodeme long, ending behind posterior margin of the gonocoxal bridge; post-hypandrial plate ending where the aedeagus shaft begins, and therefore not covered by it ...................... A. bispinata View in CoL Bravo
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.