Neoseiulus teke Pritchard & Baker
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24349/acarologia/20204361 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E7376941-8C9E-44B1-82F5-00D4A010E079 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F53B3D-FFB7-0355-74BF-FF66FA203E81 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Neoseiulus teke Pritchard & Baker |
status |
|
Neoseiulus teke Pritchard & Baker View in CoL
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) teke Pritchard & Baker, 1962: 239 .
Amblyseius teke, Meyer & Rodrigues 1966: 30 ; Moraes et al. 1989a: 83; Moraes et al. 1989b: 97.
Neoseiulus teke, Moraes et al. 1986: 98 View in CoL ; Chant & McMurtry 2003a: 37; Moraes et al. 2004a: 147; Chant & McMurtry 2007: 31.
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) bibens Blommers 1973: 111 (synonymy according to Ueckermann & Loots 1988).
Like N. barkeri View in CoL , N. longispinosus View in CoL and N. scapilatus View in CoL , N. teke View in CoL belongs to the barkeri View in CoL species group and like N. longispinosus View in CoL and N. scapilatus View in CoL , it belongs to the womersleyi View in CoL species subgroup (see above) ( Chant and McMurtry 2003a).
This species is found in sub-Saharan Africa often associated with Mononychellus tanajoa (Bondar) , the cassava green mite (CGM). It has been studied for its potential as BCA against the CGM. Nwilene and Nachman (1996) studied its reproduction characteristics on M. tanajoa . It was more efficient than Iphiseius degenerans (Berlese) , but seems not efficient enough in field conditions ( Nwilene and Nachman 1996). Quilici et al. (2000) have collected this species before in La Réunion. Exact indications of locations were provided in the paper but without any measurements of specimens collected. Measurements of specimens collected during this study are provided in table 10.
Specimens examined: 12 ♀♀ in total + 6 ♂♂ + 2 im., 10 ♀♀ + 2 ♂♂ measured. Saint- Pierre – Bassin-Plat CIRAD Research Station (aasl 153 m, Long 55°29’18” E, Lat 21°19’25” S), 1 ♀ + 1 im. on M. repens , 20/2/2017; 1 ♀ on A. hispidum , 1 ♀ + 1 im. on M. repens , 1 ♀ + 1 ♂ on P. maximum , 30/3/2017; 4 ♀♀ + 1 ♂ on M. repens , 3/4/2017; 2 ♀♀ + in plots HM, 1 ♀ + 1 ♂ in plot CC, 1 ♀ in plot H, 4/4/2017 and 6/4/2017.
Remarks: measurements of morphological characters of N. teke female and male specimens from La Réunion ( Table 10 View Table 10 ) are very close from measurements for specimens from neighbouring countries, especially from specimens from various countries in Africa, except for the holotype ( Zannou et al. 2006) and specimens from South Africa which are larger ( van der Merwe 1965).
HM |
Hastings Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Neoseiulus teke Pritchard & Baker
Kreiter, Serge, Payet, Rose-My, Douin, Martial, Fontaine, Olivier, Jacques, Fillâtre & Bellec, Fabrice Le 2020 |
Neoseiulus teke
Chant D. A. & McMurtry J. A. 2007: 31 |
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Denmark H. A. & Campos C. B. 2004: 147 |
Chant D. A. & McMurtry J. A. 2003: 37 |
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Denmark H. A. 1986: 98 |
Amblyseius teke
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & van den Berg H. & Yaninek J. S. 1989: 83 |
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Yaninek, J. S. 1989: 97 |
Meyer M. K. P. & Rodrigues M. da 1966: 30 |
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) teke
Pritchard A. E. & Baker E. W. 1962: 239 |