Tomosvaryella urdaensis Kuznetzov
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4273.4.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:77091F8E-2A3C-4A9B-81C2-656B5BF72C22 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6020349 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F487A3-B07B-FF9F-B8D3-F914B3BD64DD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tomosvaryella urdaensis Kuznetzov |
status |
|
Tomosvaryella urdaensis Kuznetzov View in CoL *
Figs 11, 14 View FIGURES 9 – 14 , 19 View FIGURES 19 – 20
Examined material. 1♂ (DNA CK815, LT671783 View Materials , tips of surstyli damaged after ID), loc. 10, 11–13.v.2013 (SMTD); 1♂ 1♀ (DNA CK853, LT671784 View Materials ), loc. 7, 6–16.v.2013 (SMTD).
Remarks. This species was described on the basis of the male holotype from Kazakhstan and is phylogenetically and morphologically closely related to T. gazliensis Kuznetzov , which was previously recorded from Alborz province by Kehlmaier & Majnon-Jahromi (2015). Both species share an almost identical DNA barcode (compare to LK391742 View Materials ), differing by a single nucleotide position. Kuznetzov (1994) illustrated the male genitalia of both species only in lateral view. Despite certain haziness, the presented microphotographs of the epandrium and surstyli of T. urdaensis and T. gazliensis provide better evidence than line drawings for showing the subtle differences separating these two species: T. urdaensis has the basis of surstyli slightly broader and more angulate than T. gazliensis ; the surstyli of T. urdaensis have the outer lateral margins slightly more concave than T. gazliensis , and the apices more pointed ( Figs 19–20 View FIGURES 19 – 20 ). However, the status of these species must be regarded as uncertain until larger series of specimens are available for study. We assume that the recorded female represents T. urdaensis as it was collected together with a male and shares its DNA barcode. The female of T. urdaensis is characterised as follows: flagellum tawny brown with yellowish apex; wing length 2.2 mm; third costal section half the length of fourth costal section; cross-vein r-m reaching cell dm in its middle; leg dark brown except for the yellow apex of femur, basal 1/4 and apex of tibia and tarsal segments (except distitarus); tergite 9 dark yellow, long and straight ( Figs 11, 14 View FIGURES 9 – 14 ).
DNA |
Department of Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sport |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Pipunculinae |
Tribe |
Tomosvaryellini |
Genus |