Pentanodes tropipennis ( Chemsak, 1977 ) Heffern & Botero & Santos-Silva, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.2.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5C0A8DD3-6AF8-418F-AD35-1D539F69CBD8 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3705100 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F3B471-D344-FFCF-6BDF-E872FB19DEAB |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pentanodes tropipennis ( Chemsak, 1977 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Pentanodes tropipennis ( Chemsak, 1977) View in CoL , comb. nov.
( Figs. 41–51 View FIGURES 41–48 View FIGURES 49–51 )
Tetranodus tropipennis Chemsak, 1977: 124 View in CoL ; Chemsak et al., 1992: 74 (cat.); Monné, 1993: 73 (cat.); Monné & Giesbert, 1994: 121 (checklist); Monné, 2005: 554 (cat.); Monné & Hovore, 2006: 133 (checklist); Swift et al., 2010: 30 (distr.); Martins & Galileo, 2013: 579 (distr.); Monné, 2019: 827 (cat.); Bezark, 2019b: 177 (checklist).
According to Chemsak (1977): “eyes large, pointed behind.” However, examination of the photographs of the holotype male shows that the upper eye lobes are absent. Accordingly, the species is transferred to Pentanodes View in CoL . It is important to note that “pointed behind” is the description used by Chemsak to indicate the eye shape in the species of Tetranodus View in CoL , in which the upper eye lobes are present and very distinct.
Chemsak (1977) also affirmed that “The acutely angulate basal gibbosities of the elytra will separate this species from the others.” This information was also used in the key to separate Tetranodus xanthocollis from T. tropipennis . However, comparison between photographs of both holotypes, as well as other specimens, shows that the basal elytral gibbosity is identical or nearly so in both species. However, the shape of the antennomere III in male is different: nearly pedunculate-clavate in T. tropipennis , and gradually widened from base to apex in T. xanthocollis .
The female examined by us ( Figs. 45–48 View FIGURES 41–48 ) has the pronotum with abundant white pubescence on almost entire posterior half, and on a wide transverse band on anterior third. Furthermore, the sides of the prothorax also have distinct white pubescence on wide central area, connecting the two pubescent areas of the pronotum. We believe that this pubescence is just a specific variation. The last maxillary and labial palpomeres are slightly securiform (not strongly widened from base to apex). The antennomeres III–VI, as also in Tetranodus , are filiform. In the holotype and the couple examined by us, the antennomeres VII–VIII are mostly yellowish-brown, with only the apical area darkened (darker on the holotype and male examined).
Material examined. COSTA RICA, San José: San Isidro de El General , 1 male, II.1993, F.D. Parker col. ( MZSP) . Limón: 7 miles N Guácimo , 1 female, 22. II– 03. III .1988, F.D. Parker col. ( MZSP).
MZSP |
Sao Paulo, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Tribe |
Neoibidionini |
SubTribe |
Compsina |
Genus |
Pentanodes tropipennis ( Chemsak, 1977 )
Heffern, Daniel, Botero, Juan Pablo & Santos-Silva, Antonio 2020 |
Tetranodus tropipennis
Monne, M. A. 2019: 827 |
Bezark, L. G. 2019: 177 |
Swift, I. & Bezark, L. G. & Nearns, E. H. & Solis, A. & Hovore, F. T. 2010: 30 |
Monne, M. A. & Hovore, F. T. 2006: 133 |
Monne, M. A. 2005: 554 |
Monne, M. A. & Giesbert, E. F. 1994: 121 |
Monne, M. A. 1993: 73 |
Chemsak, J. A. & Linsley, E. G. & Noguera, F. A. 1992: 74 |
Chemsak, J. A. 1977: 124 |