Akonesis Opitz
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/072.068.0313 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5388742 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F3879E-9376-8876-FEB0-FAF4FEFEFEA1 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Akonesis Opitz |
status |
gen. nov. |
Akonesis Opitz , new genus
Type Species. Cregya vittata Spinola, 1844b: 372 .
Diagnosis. Specimens of this genus superficially resemble those of Diutius . Beetles of these genera share similarities in body form and gross morphology, and in the peculiar coloration of the antenna ( Fig. 5 View Figs ), but in Akonesis specimens the tarsal spur formula is 1-2-2, whereas in Diutius specimens the formula is 0-2-2.
Description. Size: Length 8.5–11.0 mm; width 3.0–4.0 mm. Form ( Figs. 63, 64 View Figs ): Oblong, robust (about 3X longer than broad), body deep. Vestiture: Dorsum profusely vested with pale pubescence, antenna moderately setose, elytra with 1° and 2° setae ( Fig. 58 View Figs ) or without 1° but with 2° setae only. Head ( Figs. 1–3 View Figs ): Cranium subquadrate, frons narrower or as wide as eye, profusely indented with small, setiferous punctures; gula ( Figs. 2 View Figs , 48 View Figs ) large, subquadrate, sutures diverging anteriorly, gula with 2 well-developed, setose post-gular processes ( Fig. 48 View Figs ); labrum shallow, incised distally ( Fig. 11 View Figs ), tormal processes contiguous, epipharyngeal plate small; mandible ( Fig. 8 View Figs ) stout, anterior dens acuminate, medial and posterior dens well developed, penicillus well developed; maxilla ( Fig. 10 View Figs ) with laterolacinia present as indentation, terminal palpomere securiform; labium ( Fig. 9 View Figs ) with ligula deeply incised, ligular lobes narrowed, terminal palpomere securiform, capitulum long and slender ( Figs. 5 View Figs , 49, 51 View Figs ); eyes large, coarsely facetted, ocular notch large; antenna comprised of 10 antennomeres, capitate, capitulum long and slender, funicular antennomeres subfiliform. Thorax: Pronotum ( Figs. 4, 6 View Figs , 52 View Figs ) slightly subquadrate, disc flat, side margin with conspicuous tubercle, dorsolateral carina incomplete, anteriorly extended beyond tubercle and confluent with pronotal bead posteriorly, prointercoxal process narrow ( Fig. 52 View Figs ), expanded distally, pronotal projections long, approximating prointercoxal process ( Fig. 52 View Figs ); elytron with or without asetiferous punctures ( Figs. 55, 58 View Figs ), epipleural fold wide and in ventral position, tapered to elytral apex, anterior elytral margin not carinate; metathoracic wing as in Fig. 7 View Figs , wedge cell closed; metendosternite ( Fig. 14 View Figs ) with furcal lamina, furcal anterior plate triangular; profemora not swollen and without spines; tibial spur formula 1-2-2; tarsal pulvillar formula 3-3-3 ( Figs. 53, 54, 56, 57 View Figs ), ungues with basal denticle ( Fig. 56 View Figs ). Abdomen: Aedeagus ( Figs. 12, 13 View Figs ) shorter than length of abdomen, distal region of phallobase lobed, lateral lobes not fimbriate, tegmen short, phallobasic struts confluent with phallobasic apodeme, phallobasic rod absent, phallic plates wide; spicular fork ( Fig. 15 View Figs ) well developed, spicular apodemes fused, intraspicular plate long and linear.
Distribution. This genus is known from Bolivia and Brazil.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.