Tomarus rostratus Dupuis, 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065X-72.2.331 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:11BE44A2-4C73-4D36-A761-C9059C9C4222 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F187ED-6F19-FF8B-DBC3-FF77FDFAFED6 |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Tomarus rostratus Dupuis, 2014 |
status |
|
Tomarus rostratus Dupuis, 2014 ( Figs. 1–13 View Figs View Figs )
Tomarus rostratus Dupuis 2014: 1
Description. Female (n = 15). Habitus as in Fig. 1 View Figs . Length 17.4–20.0 mm; humeral width 8.3–9.9 mm. Color reddish brown. Frons coarsely and irregularly rugose. Head: Frontoclypeal region with 2 transverse tubercles separated by about 3 tubercle diameters. Clypeus trapezoidal, not strongly narrowed toward apex ( Fig. 2 View Figs ); apex with 2 triangular teeth separated by about 1.5 tooth diameters. Mandibles with 2 teeth and a basal lobe, dorsal surface slightly concave. Antennal club subequal in length to antennomeres 2–7. Pronotum: Surface punctate, punctures round, smaller than those on elytra, denser over apical and lateral margins. Apical margin with a small tubercle visible in lateral view ( Fig. 3 View Figs ). Pronotal fovea shallow, elongate, narrow (about 1/8 as wide as distance between eyes), surface smooth. Scutellum: Surface without punctures. Elytra: Sutural stria present and complete. Elytral punctures dense and deep, punctures mainly ocellate, 3 pairs of distinct double rows. Legs: Protibia tridentate with additional small, basal tooth.Protarsus simple, not enlarged.Apex of metatibia with small crenulation and 14–15 spinules. Venter: Prosternal process long, thick, apex transversely oval to round and bordered with long yellow setae. Abdomen: Pygidium flat in lateral view, surface homogeneously rugopunctate, apical margin with short setae ( Fig. 10 View Figs ). Apical margin of sternite VII slightly emarginated, notch broad and shallow ( Fig. 11 View Figs ). Apical margin of sternite VIII emarginate, notch narrow and deep ( Fig. 11 View Figs ). Subcoxite subquadrate, inner border with long, yellow setae. Coxite subtriangular, strongly concave, apical border with long, yellow setae ( Fig. 12 View Figs ).
Male (n = 2). The examined specimens differ from the female and extend the variation of the species as follows: Abdomen: Pygidium convex in lateral view, basal third deeply rugopunctate, disc smooth, apical margin truncate, without setae ( Fig. 8 View Figs ). Apical margin of sternite VII straight.Sternite VIII widely emarginated ( Fig. 9 View Figs ). Parameres: Widened at apical fourth, elongated from basal fourth to apex; sides parallel, without teeth or lateral projections ( Fig. 4 View Figs ), uniformly curved at lateral view ( Fig. 6 View Figs ). Spiculum gastrale: Shape symmetrical, thickened; base with 2 attached sclerites; apex recurved ( Fig. 13 View Figs ).
Variation. Body length 17.4–27.5 mm. The number of spinules on the apex of the metatibia is 8–15. The first interval of the elytra can be densely punctate or nearly impunctate (as in T. laevicollis ). The parameres are evenly curved in lateral view ( Fig. 6 View Figs ) or with an anterior slight depression or concavity ( Fig. 7 View Figs ).
Diagnosis. Tomarus rostratus is unique in the genus because of its extremely elongate parameres ( Figs. 4–7 View Figs ). It can be differentiated by the following combination of characters: Clypeus trapezoidal, pronotum with small tubercle and shallow fovea, protibia with a small fourth basal tooth, apical border of pygidium strongly truncate in males, apical margin of sternite VIII emarginated in females.
Specimens Examined. CHILE: Arica, Cuya, 16.ii. 1989, 100 m, R. Miller & R. Stange Coll. [16, 1♀, FSCA]. Arica , Valle Azapa, 6 km E Arica, 16.ii. 1989, 100 m, R. Miller & R. Stange Coll. [8♀♀, FSCA] . PERU: Lima, xii.1922, D.S. Bullock Coll. [5♀♀, USNM]. Lima, 2.xi.1930, Luis Pro Castillo Coll. [162♀, USNM] .
Distribution. Peru ( Dupuis 2014) and Chile NEW COUNTRY RECORD.
Comments. The only previously known specimen of T. rostratus was the male holotype deposited in MNHN. The type locality was also unknown as only “ Peru ” was indicated on its labels. However , the additional records from Lima and the new records in Chile provide more precise locality data, so we now can conclude that the species occurs along the coastal deserts of Peru and Chile.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Tomarus rostratus Dupuis, 2014
López-García, Margarita M. & Deloya, Cuauhtémoc 2018 |
Tomarus rostratus
Dupuis, F. 2014: 1 |