Microseira minor Geng et Yu, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.524.3.2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5699110 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F1879F-521C-8D03-FF04-0B9DFE53312B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Microseira minor Geng et Yu |
status |
sp. nov. |
Microseira minor Geng et Yu sp. nov. ( Fig. 1 View Fig )
Diagnosis: —This species is morphologically similar to the genus Microseira but differs from M. wollei in the lack of false branching, much narrower filaments and trichomes, smaller ratio of cell length and width under the light microscopy. The phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene, partial 16S-23S rRNA operon and nifH gene showed that this species was formed a well-supported clade, closest to other Microseira species , far away from other close genera. In addition, the non-producing of neurotoxins and hepatotoxins is also a major difference.
Description: —Filaments unbranched, long, 13.73–(16.04)–18.58 μm broad, forming densely aggregations, blueblack, brown-black, yellowed when old, straight or slightly flexuous. Trichomes cylindrical, isopolar, not attenuated to the ends, not or slightly constricted at the cross-walls. Cells discoid, 3.12–(5.03)–7.70 μm long, 9.02–(11.05)–13.33 μm broad, 2–3 × broader than long, with granular content, not aerotopes. Apical cells rounded, without calyptra or thickened outer cell wall. Sheath usually present, colorless, hyaline, firm, lamellated when old, and open at the apex. Reproduction by motile hormogonia formed by help of necridia. Thylakoids irregularly arranged.
Etymology: —The name of species “ minor ” was chosen because of its small and thin discoid cells.
Type locality: — In the Ganfu Channel, Jiangxi Province, China. (August 2019, site one 28°11’8.2” N, 116°10’2.56” E and October 2019, GoogleMaps site two 28°14’7.70” N, 116°6’38.21” E) GoogleMaps .
Holotype here designated: —Dry material of strain CHAB 4136 About CHAB was stored at the Freshwater Algae Biology Herbarium ( HBI), Institute of Hydrobiology , Chinese Academy of Science, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, as specimen No. JXGF201901 .
Reference strain: — CHAB 4136 and CHAB 4163 (the additional strain) were deposited at the CHAB, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Habitat: —Rock surface in freshwater rivers and channels in subtropical region.
Molecular and phylogeny analyses: —The 16S rRNA gene sequences of Microseira minor strains CHAB 4136 and CHAB 4163 obtained in this study shared 98.90%–99.92% similarities among all six clones by calculating p-distance with pairwise deletion of gaps using MEGA software v7.0. These clones shared 95.00%–96.01% with other Microseira species , less than 97% which was regarded as the cutoff for bacterial species delimitation. These clones had a maximum similarity of 16S rRNA gene sequences as 95.50% with their closest filamentous genera (sharing similarities to Potamosiphon, Aerosakkonema , Phormidium, Potamolinea and Oscillatoria as 93.98%–95.50%, 92.78%–92.95%, 92.28%–92.44%, 92.11%–92.44% and 91.92%–92.60%, respectively) ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 ). The 16S rRNA gene phylogenetic trees based on ML and BI methods showed that the six clones of Microseira minor clustered a unique clade (cluster A) together with other Microseira species ( Fig. 3 View Fig and Fig. 4 View Fig ), supported by ML and BI calculations with high bootstrap values of 100% and 1.000.
In the nifH phylogeny ( Fig. 5 View Fig and Fig. 6 View Fig ), the eight clones obtained from the two strains of Microseira minor in this study formed a well-supported freshwater clade together with all environmental clones of Microseira wollei (cluster M, cluster N and cluster L). The nifH gene sequences of CHAB 4136 (cluster S1) and CHAB 4163 (cluster S2) divided into two distinct sub-groups with cluster M and cluster N, and sequence similarities were 94.28%–95.96% and 96.97%–98.32%, respectively ( Table 2 View TABLE 2 ). The whole clade formed by Microseira clones including the two strains of Microseira minor were supported by ML and BI methods with high bootstrap values of 85% and 0.90, supporting the two strains as a new species Microseira minor within the genus Microseira .
Genes associated with four types of toxins of microcystins, cylindrospermopsin, paralytic shellfish toxins and anatoxin were not detected in any of these Microseira minor strains.
Analyses of ITS between 16S and 23S rRNA gene: —The ITS sequences of the six clones from the two strains of Microseira minor , shared 96.05-96.26% similarities with each other, and contained both tRNA Ile and tRNA Ala, ranging from 485 to 499 bp.
Strains | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Microseira minor CHAB | ||||||||||||||||||||
4136-4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2. Microseira minor CHAB | 99.83 | |||||||||||||||||||
4136-5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3. Microseira minor CHAB | 99.92 | 99.92 | ||||||||||||||||||
4136-6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
4. Microseira minor CHAB | 98.90 | 98.90 | 98.98 | |||||||||||||||||
4163-5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5. Microseira minor CHAB | 99.07 | 99.07 | 99.15 | 99.83 | ||||||||||||||||
4163-6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
6. Microseira minor CHAB | 98.98 | 98.98 | 99.07 | 99.75 | 99.92 | |||||||||||||||
4163-7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
7. Microseira wollei NIES- | 95.42 | 95.50 | 95.50 | 95.08 | 95.08 | 95.00 | ||||||||||||||
4236 | ||||||||||||||||||||
8. Microseira wollei AW2009 | 95.76 | 95.84 | 95.84 | 95.25 | 95.25 | 95.17 | 98.64 | |||||||||||||
clone B19 | ||||||||||||||||||||
9. Microseira wollei YC 0404 | 95.93 | 96.01 | 96.01 | 95.42 | 95.42 | 95.34 | 98.81 | 99.49 | ||||||||||||
clone E43 | ||||||||||||||||||||
10. Microseira wollei YC1109 | 95.84 | 95.93 | 95.93 | 95.42 | 95.42 | 95.34 | 98.56 | 99.41 | 99.58 | |||||||||||
clone A45 | ||||||||||||||||||||
11. Microseira wollei AW2009 | 95.93 | 96.01 | 96.01 | 95.42 | 95.42 | 95.34 | 98.81 | 99.83 | 99.66 | 99.58 | ||||||||||
clone B37 | ||||||||||||||||||||
12. Microseira wollei AW2009 | 95.93 | 96.01 | 96.01 | 95.42 | 95.42 | 95.34 | 98.81 | 99.83 | 99.66 | 99.58 | 100.00 | |||||||||
clone B35 | ||||||||||||||||||||
13. Microseira wollei YC2010 | 95.67 | 95.76 | 95.76 | 95.25 | 95.25 | 95.17 | 98.47 | 99.15 | 99.66 | 99.58 | 99.32 | 99.32 | ||||||||
clone B9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
14. Microseira wollei str. | 94.83 | 94.91 | 94.91 | 95.59 | 95.59 | 95.50 | 97.63 | 97.12 | 97.63 | 97.29 | 97.29 | 97.29 | 97.37 | |||||||
Carmichael/Alabama | ||||||||||||||||||||
15. Potamosiphon austaliensis | 93.98 | 94.06 | 94.06 | 94.23 | 94.40 | 94.32 | 93.64 | 93.30 | 93.81 | 93.47 | 93.47 | 93.47 | 93.72 | 93.98 | ||||||
FHC0914.01 | ||||||||||||||||||||
16. Potamosiphon austaliensis | 95.08 | 95.17 | 95.17 | 95.34 | 95.50 | 95.42 | 94.40 | 94.23 | 94.74 | 94.40 | 94.40 | 94.40 | 94.57 | 95.00 | 98.56 | |||||
FHC0914.02 | ||||||||||||||||||||
17. Potamosiphon austaliensis | 94.15 | 94.23 | 94.23 | 94.40 | 94.57 | 94.49 | 93.81 | 93.47 | 93.98 | 93.64 | 93.64 | 93.64 | 93.89 | 94.15 | 99.66 | 98.73 | ||||
FHC0914.03 | ||||||||||||||||||||
18. Phormidium uncinatum | 92.28 | 92.36 | 92.36 | 92.28 | 92.44 | 92.36 | 92.02 | 91.85 | 92.36 | 92.02 | 92.02 | 92.02 | 92.19 | 92.78 | 93.63 | 94.40 | 93.80 | |||
SAG 81.79 | ||||||||||||||||||||
19. Oscillatoria princeps | 92.52 | 92.52 | 92.60 | 92.01 | 92.01 | 91.92 | 91.92 | 92.01 | 92.26 | 92.09 | 92.18 | 92.18 | 92.01 | 91.58 | 90.82 | 91.67 | 90.99 | 91.49 | ||
CCALA 1115 clone K1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
20. Aerosakkonema funiforme | 92.78 | 92.87 | 92.87 | 92.95 | 92.95 | 92.87 | 92.61 | 93.04 | 93.38 | 93.21 | 93.21 | 93.21 | 93.21 | 93.29 | 92.62 | 93.80 | 92.79 | 92.61 | 91.76 | |
Lao26 | ||||||||||||||||||||
21. Potamolinea magna 47PC | 92.36 | 92.44 | 92.44 | 92.19 | 92.19 | 92.11 | 92.28 | 92.28 | 92.53 | 92.28 | 92.44 | 92.44 | 92.28 | 92.78 | 91.26 | 92.19 | 91.43 | 91.25 | 91.16 | 92.11 |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |