Pholcophora tehuacan Huber, 2023

Huber, Bernhard A., Meng, Guanliang, Valdez-Mondragón, Alejandro, Král, Jiří, Ávila Herrera, Ivalú M. & Carvalho, Leonardo S., 2023, Short-legged daddy-long-leg spiders in North America: the genera Pholcophora and Tolteca (Araneae, Pholcidae), European Journal of Taxonomy 880 (1), pp. 1-89 : 35-40

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.880.2173

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3F806FD6-2EB3-456A-AFD7-780A0FBEB2DA

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8155486

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D7F69EC5-F4AB-4425-AABF-3257B146EA8A

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:D7F69EC5-F4AB-4425-AABF-3257B146EA8A

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Pholcophora tehuacan Huber
status

sp. nov.

Pholcophora tehuacan Huber sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:D7F69EC5-F4AB-4425-AABF-3257B146EA8A

Figs 3J–K View Fig , 25–29 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig , 33K–L View Fig

Diagnosis

Easily distinguished from most known congeners (except P. maria Gertsch, 1977 ) by small size (carapace width <0.70; tibia 1 length <1.0) and by pair of tube-like sacs in female internal genitalia ( Fig. 28B View Fig ). From P. maria by shorter female internal sacs (60 µm vs 110 µm), smaller body (total body length 1.2 vs 1.65; carapace width 0.55 vs 0.65) and shorter legs (female tibia 1: 0.60–0.65 vs 0.93). Male of P. maria unknown.

Remark

Judging from the female internal genitalia (compare Fig. 28B View Fig with Huber 2000: fig. 1357), this species may be closely related to P. maria Gertsch, 1977 which is known from a single female specimen originating from Yucatan, Cueva (Gruta, Actún) Xpukil (20.551° N, 89.912° W, 80 m a.s.l.). This implies that P. maria is probably correctly placed in Pholcophora (it was considered incertae sedis in Huber 2000).

Etymology

The species name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.

Type material

Holotype MEXICO – Puebla • ♂; ~ 35 km SE of Tehuacan, Calapa bridge, N side; 18.1652° N, 97.2605° W; 1020 m a.s.l.; 24 Oct. 2019; B.A. Huber and A. Valdez-Mondragón leg.; LATLAX. GoogleMaps

Paratypes MEXICO – Puebla • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀, and 1 female abdomen; same collection data as for holotype; ZFMK Ar 23949 GoogleMaps 4 ♂♂, 22 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; LATLAX GoogleMaps 1 ♂, 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype but W side of Calapa bridge; 18.1619° N, 97.2647° W; 1010 m a.s.l.; 23 Oct. 2019; ZFMK Ar 23950 GoogleMaps .

Other material examined

MEXICO – Puebla • 2 ♂♂, 6 ♀♀, 5 juvs, in pure ethanol; same collection data as for holotype; four female prosomata used for molecular work, 1 ♂ 1 ♀ used for SEM, 1 female abdomen transferred to ZFMK Ar 23949; ZFMK Mex353 GoogleMaps 1 ♂, 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; partly used for µ-CT study; ZFMK GoogleMaps 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; partly used for karyotype analysis; ZFMK 23951 About ZFMK GoogleMaps 1 juv., in pure ethanol; same collection data as for holotype but W side of Calapa bridge; ZFMK Mex350 GoogleMaps .

Description

Male (holotype)

MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 1.20, carapace width 0.55. Distance PME-PME 40 µm; diameter PME 45 µm; distance PME-ALE 20 µm; distance AME-AME 15 µm; diameter AME 20 µm. Leg 1: 2.55 (0.75 + 0.20 + 0.65 + 0.60 + 0.35), tibia 2: 0.55, tibia 3: 0.50, tibia 4: 0.75; tibia 1 L/d: 8; diameters of leg femora 0.11–0.12, of leg tibiae 0.08.

COLOUR (in ethanol). Prosoma and legs monochromous pale ochre-yellow; abdomen slightly darker, also monochromous.

BODY. Habitus as in Fig. 3J View Fig . Ocular area barely raised. Carapace with low thoracic groove. Clypeus unmodified, very short (clypeus rim to ALE 0.12). Sternum slightly wider than long (0.34/0.32), almost round (i.e., not heart-shaped), with pair of small but distinct anterior processes (~30 µm long) near coxae 1. Abdomen globular; gonopore with four epiandrous spigots ( Fig. 29C View Fig ); ALS with seven spigots, PMS with two spigots ( Fig. 29G View Fig ).

CHELICERAE ( Fig. 26A–B View Fig ). With pair of frontal apophyses directed downwards; stridulatory ridges very fine ( Fig. 29A View Fig ; distances between ridges 2.0–2.2 µm), not visible in dissecting microscope.

PALPS ( Fig. 25 View Fig ). Coxa unmodified; trochanter without process; femur proximally with retrolateral-ventral process and prolateral stridulatory pick, distally widened but simple, slightly curved towards dorsal; femur-patella joints slightly shifted toward prolateral side; tibia very short, with two trichobothria; tibia-tarsus joints not shifted to one side; tarsal organ raised, with small opening ( Fig. 29E View Fig ); procursus very simple ( Fig. 26C–E View Fig ), with subdistal constriction and semi-transparent tip; genital bulb complex ( Fig. 26F–H View Fig ), with distinctive retrolateral-dorsal apophysis and long distal process.

LEGS. Without spines and curved hairs; with usual low number of short vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia 1 at 60%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1; tarsus 1 with 6 pseudosegments, all fairly distinct.

Variation (male)

Tibia 1 in ten males (incl. holotype): 0.60–0.65 (mean 0.62).

Female

In general, similar to male ( Fig. 3K View Fig ) but sternum without pair of anterior humps, and chelicerae without stridulatory files ( Fig. 29B View Fig ). Total body length ~1.20–1.40; tibia 1 in 14 females 0.60–0.65 (mean 0.62). Epigynum ( Fig. 27 View Fig ) with short and simple anterior plate slightly protruding in lateral view; posterior plate wide, median part not separated from lateral parts by pair of whitish anterior areas. Internal genitalia ( Fig. 28 View Fig ) with pair of distinct sacs (receptacles?) 60 µm long, without (or with very small?) pore plates.

Distribution

Known from type locality only, in Mexico, Puebla ( Fig. 2 View Fig ).

Natural history

The spiders were found by turning rocks in a very dry area ( Fig. 34D View Fig ). They shared the microhabitat and sometimes the individual rock with a small undescribed species of Physocyclus Simon, 1893 , and were difficult to distinguish from juveniles of that species. At disturbance they started to run rapidly and dropped from the rock to the ground (where they could no longer be found). The area was shared by a second representative of Pholcophora (“Mex354”, see below), which also shared the microhabitat but was never found on the same rock as Pholcophora tehuacan sp. nov.

ZFMK

Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Pholcidae

Genus

Pholcophora

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF