Chromis kennensis Whitley, 1964
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.12782/sd.18.2.193 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3349E2A0-D5AF-492D-AC27-56DCBB605E54 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ED87A1-FFB5-E51F-FC78-F965FDBCFC3C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Chromis kennensis Whitley, 1964 |
status |
|
Chromis kennensis Whitley, 1964 View in CoL
[Australian English name: Yellow-spotted Chromis ] ( Figs 8 View Fig , 9 View Fig , 11 View Fig , 12E View Fig ; Tables 3–4)
Chromis kennensis Whitley, 1964: 182 View in CoL , Fig. 12 View Fig (type locality: Kenn Reef, Coral Sea); Allen 1975: 81, 83, unnumbered fig. (Kenn Reef, Coral Sea; Lord Howe Island; Sydney, Australia; Ouvea Island , Loyalty Islands, New Caledonia) .
Chromis flavomaculata View in CoL (not of Kamohara): Allen 1991: 68 (Ouvea Island, Loyalty Islands, New Caledonia; Lord Howe Island; Coral Sea; eastern Australia between southern Great Barrier Reef and Sydney); Kuiter 1993: 237, unnumbered fig. (Coral Sea to Montague Island; Lord Howe Island); Randall et al. 1997: 258, unnumbered fig. (Coral Sea; Lord Howe Island; New Caledonia); Randall 2005: 357, unnumbered fig. (southern Great Barrier Reef to New South Wales; Lord Howe Island; Norfolk Island; New Caledonia); Allen et al. 2006: 1449, (Lord Howe Island; Great Barrier Reef, Queensland to Montague Island, New South Wales, Australia); Kuiter and Debelius 2006: 530, unnumbered fig. ( Australia); Kato 2011b: 58 (Great Barrier Reef; New Caledonia; Tonga); Allen et al. 2012: 80 (eastern Australia and Coral Sea); Allen and Erdmann 2012: 580 (eastern Australia; Coral Sea; New Caledonia; northern tip of New Zealand).
Holotype. AMS IB. 4973, 77.6 mm SL, Kenn Reef,
Coral Sea, D. McMichael.
Non-type material examined. 23 specimens, 22.5– 93.0 mm SL— AUSTRALIA: AMS I . 17357-023, 43.0 mm SL, off Phillip Point, Lord Howe Island , New South Wales, 31°05′S, 159°01′E, G GoogleMaps . Allen et al .; AMS I. 17376-008, 4 specimens, 33.6–35.1 mm SL, Lord Howe Island , New South Wales, 31°50′S, 159°10′E, F GoogleMaps . Talbot et al .; AMS I. 17380-006, 2 specimens, 22.5–23.8 mm SL, Lord Howe Island , New South Wales, 31°50′S, 159°10′E, AMS party; AMS I GoogleMaps . 17737- 001, 48.8 mm SL, Long Bay, Sydney , New South Wales, 33°07′S, 151°03′E, R GoogleMaps . Kuiter ; AMS I . 27139–024, 71.4 mm SL, Middleton Reef, Coral Sea , 29°48′67″S, 159°06′83″E, A . Gill et al .; AMS I. 27891-043, 2 specimens, 59.0– 62.2 mm SL, Elizabeth Reef, Coral Sea, 29°09′S, 159°00′E, D GoogleMaps . Williams et al .; BPBM 14766 About BPBM , 3 specimens, 30.0–33.0 mm SL, Lord Howe Island , New South Wales, 20–27 m depth, 6 February 1973, spear, J . Randall and G . Allen; BPBM 33664 About BPBM , 3 specimens, 79.0–82.0 mm SL, Coral Sea , 19°52′S, 158°19′E, 9 m depth, 24 August 1988, J GoogleMaps . Randall et al . NEW CALEDONIA: BPBM 11438 About BPBM , 70.4 mm SL, 1 km northwest of Dumbae Pass , Nouméa, 15–18 m depth, J . Randall et al .; USNM 319941 About USNM , 31.8 mm SL, Ouvea Island , Loyalty Islands, 20°39′30″S, 166°23′00″E, 18 m depth, 14 November 1991, J GoogleMaps . Williams et al .; USNM 319942 About USNM , 82.1 mm SL, Bagaat Islet, Ouvea Atoll , Loyalty Islands, 20°37′18″S, 166°16′08″E, 15–22 m depth, 16 November 1991, J GoogleMaps . Williams , et al .; USNM 319943 About USNM , 74.8 mm SL, Ouvea Island , Loyalty Islands, 20°34′12″S, 166°14′12″E, 5 m depth, 16 November 1991, J GoogleMaps . Williams et al . TONGA: USNM 332432 About USNM , 28.9 mm SL, Ha’atafu Beach , Tongatapu, 21°03′58″S, 175°20′03″W, 5.5– 7.9 m depth, 21 October 1993, J GoogleMaps . Williams , et al .
Diagnosis. A species of Chromis with the following combination of characters: dorsal fin rays XIII, 11–13 (mode XIII, 12); anal fin rays II, 10–12 (11); pectoral fin rays 17–21 (19); principal caudal fin rays 15; spiniform caudal fin rays 2; scale rows in longitudinal series 24–27 (26); tubed lateral line scales 15–19 (18); scale rows above lateral line 3, scale rows below lateral line 9–10 (9); gill rakers 7–9 (8)+21–25 (24)=29–34 (32); preopercular margin smooth; caudal fin deeply forked, without prolonged filaments; basal width of pelvic fin axillary scale 0.6–1.8% of SL; basal width of scale between pelvic fin bases 2.0–2.8% of SL; prominent black blotch covering entire pectoral fin base throughout life; no white spot at end of dorsal fin base; caudal peduncle without distinct markings; caudal fin yellowish with no dark band along each fin lobe.
Distribution. Chromis kennensis is known only from the southwestern Pacific Ocean: the Coral Sea (Ken Reef, Middleton Reef, and Elizabeth Reef), Lord Howe Island, eastern Australia (Sydney), New Caledonia (Ouvea Island), and Tonga (Tongatapu) ( Fig. 9 View Fig ).
Remarks. Kamohara (1960) described Chromis flavomaculata (as flavomaculatus ) as a new species on the basis of a single specimen (BSKU 8482; Fig. 2D View Fig ) from Kochi, Japan, while also listing an additional non-type specimen (BSKU 4944) of the species from Tokushima, Japan. Examination of the holotype and non-type specimen showed them to be identical with C. notata in having four scale rows above the lateral line and 12 scale rows below, a black blotch restricted to the upper two-thirds of the pectoral fin base, and black bands along the caudal fin lobes ( Fig. 2 View Fig ; Tables 4, 5). Therefore, C. flavomaculata is herein regarded as a junior synonym of C. notata . In the same paper, Kamohara (1960) gave a description of two specimens of C. notata . These two specimens (BSKU 4946 and 8513) were examined and reidentified by us as C. notata and C. yamakawai sp. nov., respectively. Data for Kamohara’s (1960) specimens are given in Table 5.
A species of Chromis , previously identified as C. flavomaculata , is herein regarded as comprising two geographically disjunct species: C. yamakawai sp. nov. from the northwestern Pacific Ocean and C. kennensis from the southwestern Pacific Ocean ( Fig. 9 View Fig ). These two species can be distinguished from C. notata by having three scale rows above the lateral line and nine or 10 scale rows below (vs 4 or 5 and 11 or 12 in C. notata ; Tables 1–5), a black blotch covering the entire pectoral fin base in adults (vs restricted to the upper two-thirds of the pectoral fin base), and a yellow caudal fin without black bands (vs a grayish caudal fin with black bands along the lobes) ( Figs 3 View Fig , 8 View Fig , 10 View Fig ).
Chromis kennensis , previously regarded as a junior synonym of C. flavomaculata (e.g., Randall et al. 1997; Randall 2005; Allen et al. 2006), differs from C. yamakawai sp. nov. in coloration, meristics, and morphometrics. In young specimens, the dark blotch at the base of the pectoral fin is relatively large in C. kennensis , covering the entire fin base, whereas that of C. yamakawai is small, covering only the upper half of the fin base (the blotch becomes larger with growth in C. yamakawai ) ( Figs 8 View Fig , 10 View Fig ). In meristics, C. kennensis differs slightly from C. yamakawai in having fewer tubed lateral line scales (15–19 vs 16–21 in C. yamakawai ), and more gill rakers [21–25 (mode 24) lower gill rakers and 29–34 (32) total rakers vs 20–25 (23) and 27–33 (30), respectively] ( Table 3). In morphometrics, the basal width of the pelvic fin axillary scale is 0.6–1.8% of SL (mean 1.5%) in C. kennensis , whereas that of C. yamakawai is 1.4–2.8% (2.2%) ( Fig. 11 View Fig ; Table 4). The basal width of the scale between the pelvic fins in C. kennensis (2.0–2.8% of SL, mean 2.6%) also tends to be less than that of C. yamakawai (2.2–3.9%, 3.0%) ( Fig. 11 View Fig ; Table 4). Moreover, C. yamakawai grows larger than C. kennensis (largest recorded size 130.8 mm vs 93.0 mm SL).
Chromis kennensis and C. yamakawai are similar to C. pura Allen and Randall, 2004 , which is known only from the Alor Islands, Indonesia, in overall body appearance and general coloration, but C. pura has a yellowish caudal peduncle, darker yellow fins, and a smaller black blotch at the base of the pectoral fin ( Allen and Randall 2004: figs. 2, 3). Chromis pura also differs from the former two species in having fewer gill rakers (25–27 in C. pura vs 29–34 in C. kennensis and 27–33 in C. yamakawai ).
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chromis kennensis Whitley, 1964
Iwatsubo, Hiroki & Motomura, Hiroyuki 2013 |
Chromis kennensis
Allen, G. R. 1975: 81 |
Whitley, G. P. 1964: 182 |