Chaetacanthus pomareae ( Kinberg, 1856 )

Salazar-Silva, Patricia, López-Sánchez, Daniel A. & Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I., 2020, Revision of Chaetacanthus Seidler, 1922 (Annelida, Phyllodocida, Polynoidae), Zootaxa 4885 (3), pp. 395-422 : 415-417

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4885.3.5

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AFE72E8B-A590-4B89-96A1-880C2D2AE14B

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4329434

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EC4719-FFD8-E54E-66D0-FF01FD266627

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Chaetacanthus pomareae ( Kinberg, 1856 )
status

 

Chaetacanthus pomareae ( Kinberg, 1856) View in CoL

Figures 17 View FIGURE 17 , 18 View FIGURE 18

Lepidonotus pomareae Kinberg, 1856: 383 View in CoL ; Kinberg 1858: 10, Pl. 3, Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 , Pl. 10, Fig. 47; Seidler 1924: 20 (key), 32–33. Chaetacanthus pomareae: Hartman 1948: 27–29 View in CoL , Pl. 3, Figs 13 View FIGURE 13 , 14 View FIGURE 14 .

Type material. Central South Pacific, French Polynesia. Holotype of Lepidonotus pomareae Kinberg, 1856 , SMNH 395 View Materials , Tahiti, 20°S, 150° W, Freg. Eugenie Exped. 1851–53. GoogleMaps

Diagnosis. Chaetacanthus with branchial filaments single, thick lobes; elytra with globular micropapillae and microtubercles; round macrotubercles larger on first pair of elytra; conical macrotubercles in following elytra, macrotubercles up to five times longer than wide, basally spinous, tips long, smooth; elytra without large, amber-colour macrotubercles arranged in honeycomb like groups.

Description. Holotype in poor condition, without posterior end, 1.2 cm long, 0.3 cm wide, 23 segments. Data from description and illustrations by Kinberg (1858) given in parentheses.

Prostomium bilobed, hexagonal, as long as wide; two pairs of eyes, without pigmentation; anterior pair on middle part, posterior pair near to posterior margin ( Fig. 17A View FIGURE 17 ). Facial tubercle prominent, pointed. Median antenna with ceratophore long, inserted frontally, style long, expanded subdistally, tip filiform (slightly longer than laterals). Lateral antennae with ceratophores inserted terminally, styles thin, shorter than median antenna, similar in shape to median antenna ( Fig. 17A View FIGURE 17 ). Palps with stout papillae, tapered, as long as median antenna. Pharynx missing (previously removed; 12 pairs of marginal papillae; jaws with smooth cutting edge).

Tentacular segment not visible dorsally; tentaculophores long, thin, with chaetae; tentacular cirri similar in shape to antennae. Segment two dorsally projected on prostomium as a nuchal rounded lobe ( Fig. 17A View FIGURE 17 ).

Elytra with fringe of short papillae; surface granular with numerous microtubercles, and digitiform papillae ( Fig. 17G View FIGURE 17 ). First pair of elytra with microtubercles and macrotubercles spherical or hemispherical, spinous ( Figs 17B, C View FIGURE 17 ; 18A, F View FIGURE 18 ), larger in elytrophoral plug area ( Fig. 18B View FIGURE 18 ). Elytra of median and posterior segments oval with fringe of slender papillae ( Figs 17F View FIGURE 17 ; 18C, E View FIGURE 18 ), surface with numerous conical macrotubercles, amber incolour, sclerotized, basally spinous, tips long ( Figs 17D, E View FIGURE 17 ; 18D, E, G, H View FIGURE 18 ), larger macrotubercles over elytrophoral plug area.

Parapodia biramous, with branchial filaments laterally to eytrophores, cirrophores and between neuropodia. Notopodia shorter than neuropodia. Neuropodia with postchaetal rounded lobe, prechaetal lobe with a small acicular lobe, acicular tips slightly projected. Dorsal cirri short, thin, smooth, with subdistal swelling, tips filiform. Cirrophores short. Ventral cirri thin, short, tips filiform. Nephridial papillae from segment seven.

Notochaetae abundant, long, slender, with minute rows of spines. Neurochaetae thicker than notochaetae; upper bundle with shorter chaetae, tips with subdistal spines. Pygidium with anal cirri long, similar to dorsal cirri, anus terminal in last segment.

Remarks. The specific epithet given by Kinberg most probably refers to Queen Animata Pômare, who reigned in Tahiti from 1827 to 1877, an account of whom is given by O’Brien (2006). The type specimen is the only known record.

The holotype of C. pomareae ( Kinberg, 1856) is about half as long as the critical size indicated by Augener (1927), and herein confirmed; however, instead of having many globular macrotubercles densely packed, there are just a few, and they have very long, conical macrotubercles in the elytrophoral plug area. Consequently, we are confident about using the type, size, and density of globular macrotubercles as diagnostic features, and that C. pomareae differs from its congeners by having a low density of globular macrotubercles, and many conical macrotubercles.

Type locality. Tahiti , French Polynesia (20°S, 150° W) GoogleMaps .

Distribution. Only known from the locus typicus.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Annelida

Class

Polychaeta

Order

Phyllodocida

SubOrder

Aphroditiformia

Family

Polynoidae

SubFamily

Lepidonotinae

Genus

Chaetacanthus

Loc

Chaetacanthus pomareae ( Kinberg, 1856 )

Salazar-Silva, Patricia, López-Sánchez, Daniel A. & Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. 2020
2020
Loc

Lepidonotus pomareae

Hartman, O. 1948: 29
Seidler, H. J. 1924: 20
Kinberg, J. G. H. 1858: 10
Kinberg, J. G. H. 1856: 383
1856
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF