Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum Herzog, Bergman et Reyda, 2016

Reyda, Florian B., Healy, Claire J., Haslach, Andrew R., Ruhnke, Timothy R., Aprill, Tara L., Bergman, Michael P., Daigler, Andrew L., Dedrick, Elsie A., Delgado, Illari, Forti, Kathryn S., Herzog, Kaylee S., Russell, Rebecca S. & Willsey, Danielle D., 2016, A new genus of rhinebothriidean cestodes from batoid elasmobranchs, with the description of five new species and two new combinations, Folia Parasitologica (038) 63 (38), pp. 1-28 : 14-16

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.14411/fp.2016.038

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FE2205B0-4B03-4929-8177-FEA36E9D014D

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8147823

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/97362AA0-762D-4C87-B5ED-0A3664D69E98

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:97362AA0-762D-4C87-B5ED-0A3664D69E98

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum Herzog, Bergman et Reyda
status

sp. nov.

Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum Herzog, Bergman et Reyda View in CoL View at ENA sp. n.

Figs. 1 View Fig , 8 View Fig , 9 View Fig , 16D View Fig

ZooBank number for species:

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:97362AA0-762D-4C87-B5ED-0A3664D69E98

Description (based on whole mounts of 29 complete mature worms, cross sections of 2 strobila and longitudinal sections of 2 scoleces and 2 scoleces prepared for SEM): Worms ( Fig. 8A View Fig ) euapolytic, acraspedote, 1.10–2.28 mm (1.64 ± 0.3; n = 29) long, greatest width 368–933 (601 ± 140; n = 29) at level of scolex; 5–9 (7.3 ± 1.1; n = 29) proglottids per worm. Cephalic peduncle lacking; small darkly staining germinative zone present.

Scolex ( Fig. 8B View Fig ) consisting of scolex proper bearing 4 stalked bothridia. Stalks 49–270 (119 ± 54; n = 22) long by 48–101 (73 ± 15; n = 27) wide, attached slightly posterior to middle of bothridia. Bothridia varying in shape with degree of contraction, from finely ovoid ( Fig. 8A View Fig ), broadly ovoid ( Fig. 8B View Fig ), to broadly deltoid ( Fig. 9A View Fig ), facially loculated, 247–390 (319 ± 35; n = 24) long by 213–360 (288 ± 37; n = 24) wide; bothridial margins with thin rim. Anterior region of bothridia ( Figs. 8A,B View Fig , 9B View Fig ) with 6–8 horizontally oriented loculi (i.e. loculi wider than long) with 6–8 complete transverse septa (7.2 ± 0.5; n = 26). Anteriormost loculus 30–51 (40 ± 6; n = 27) long by 54–90 (71 ± 10; n = 29) wide. Posterior region of bothridia with 8 (n = 21) nonmedial longitudinal septa dividing bothridia into 9 loculi longer than wide; majority of longitudinal septa overlapping posteriormost 3–6 (4.3 ± 0.9; n = 13) transverse septa of anterior region of bothridia, resulting in a grid-like pattern of septa and loculi in the centre of bothridium ( Fig. 8A,B View Fig ).

Loculi and septa of distal bothridial surfaces ( Fig. 9B View Fig ) bearing capilliform filitriches and coniform spinitriches. Proximal bothridial rim ( Fig. 9C,D View Fig ) bearing capilliform filitriches ( Fig. 9B View Fig ). Proximal bothridial surfaces away from rim bearing acicular filitriches throughout bothridium ( Fig. 9D,E,F View Fig ). Posterior margin of proximal bothridial surfaces bearing a patch of coniform spinitriches ( Fig. 9C,E View Fig ) near, but not extending to, bothridial rim. Bothridial stalks and strobila ( Fig. 9G View Fig ) bearing capilliform filitriches only.

Strobila with 2–5 (3.5 ± 0.9; n = 29) proglottids wider than long followed by 2–6 (3.9 ± 0.8; n = 29) proglottids longer than wide. Strobila widest at terminal proglottid; terminal proglottid 381–840 (601 ± 127; n = 29) long by 78–155 (12 ± 18; n = 29) wide; genital pore located 50–61% (55 ± 3.6; n = 29) of proglottid length from proglottid posterior margin. Immature proglottids 4–8 (6.0 ± 1.1; n = 29) in number. Mature proglottids 1–2 (1.3 ± 0.5; n = 29) in number, including 0–1 (0.6 ± 0.5; n = 29) vas deferens-mature proglottid.

Testes in mature proglottids 9–16 (13 ± 1.9; n = 28) in total number, 1 layer deep in section, arranged in 2 columns; columns extending from anterior margin of proglottid to anterior margin of cirrus sac, 23–57 (33 ± 7; n = 25) long by 27–49 (39 ± 7; n = 25) wide. Vas deferens coiled, entering anterior margin of cirrus sac, extending from level of ovarian isthmus to overlap posteriormost testes. Cirrus sac thin-walled, oval, extending medially past midline of proglottid; cirrus sac in terminal mature proglottid 45–69 (57 ± 6; n = 12) long by 38–60 (49 ± 7; n = 12) wide; cirrus sac in vas deferens-mature proglottids 52–79 (63 ± 8; n = 16) long by 45–63 (54 ± 5; n = 16) wide. Cirrus spinitriches present.

Vagina ( Figs. 8C View Fig , 16D View Fig ) thick-walled, weakly sinuous, somewhat overlapping medial portion of cirrus sac ( Fig. 8A View Fig ), extending along midline of proglottid from ootype region to anterior margin of cirrus sac, then laterally to open into genital atrium anterior to cirrus sac; vaginal sphincter absent. Seminal receptacle present. Ovary near posterior end of proglottid, H-shaped in frontal view, tetralobed in cross section. Ovarian lobes asymmetrical; poral ovarian lobe somewhat overlapping cirrus sac; poral and aporal ovarian lobes in terminal mature proglottids 125–201 (155 ± 28; n = 9) and 140–213 (165 ± 27; n = 9) long, respectively. Poral and aporal ovarian lobes in vas deferens-mature proglottids 175–290 (216 ± 27; n = 15) and 175–290 (228 ± 34; n = 15) long, respectively. Maximum width of ovary 68–114 (92 ± 12; n = 24). Ovarian isthmus at or anterior to midpoint of ovary; poral lobe of ovary stopping 30–80 (53 ± 14; n = 24) short of genital pore. Mehlis’ gland posterior to ovarian isthmus, 24–70 (40 ± 11; n = 20) long by 14–30 (21 ± 5; n = 18) wide. Vitellarium follicular, 1 dorsal and 1 ventral column on each side of proglottid; columns extending from anterior to posterior margin of proglottid, interrupted by terminal genitalia, and interrupted by ovary ( Fig. 8A,C View Fig ). Uterus ventral, sacciform, extending from posterior margin of proglottid to near anterior margin of proglottid.

T y p e a n d o n l y k n o w n h o s t: Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley, Roughnose stingray (Myliobatiformes: Dasyatidae ).

Ty p e l o c a l i t y: South China Sea off Mukah (02°53'52''N; 112°05'44''E), Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo (BO-267) GoogleMaps .

A d d i t i o n a l l o c a l i t i e s: Java Sea off Singkawang (Pasar Bringin) (00°55'06''N; 108°58'58''E) GoogleMaps , West Kalimantan, Indonesian Borneo (KA-148).

S i t e o f i n f e c t i o n: Spiral intestine.

Ty p e m a t e r i a l: Holotype MZUM (P) No. 2016.13 (H). Paratypes: IPCAS No. C-741; LRP Nos. 9003–9004; 9083– 9117 (including molecular vouchers, sec-tions, and SEM specimens); MZUM (P) No. 2016.14 (P)–2016.15 (P); SBC No. P-00072; USNM Nos. 1420471–1420477.

E t y m o l o g y: This species is named for the grid-like pattern of septa in the centre of the bothridium. The name is a combination of the Latin ‘hyphantos’, meaning woven, and the Latin ‘septum’.

Remarks. The most striking characteristic of S. hyphantoseptum sp. n. is the extensive grid-like appearance of the septa on the centre of the bothridia ( Fig. 8A,B View Fig ). This configuration results from the extensive overlap of transverse (anterior) septa and longitudinal (posterior) septa. This feature readily distinguishes S. hyphantoseptum from S. ashleyae and S. davidcynthiaorum , both of which lack overlapping septa. The only other described species of Stillabothrium with overlapping transverse and longitudinal septa is S. campbelli ( Fig. 6A,B View Fig ). Although the centre of bothridia of S. campbelli is grid-like, the grid-like area is less extensive than in S. hyphantoseptum (compare Figs. 6B View Fig and 8B View Fig ). In S. campbelli , the posteriormost 3–4 transverse septa are overlapped by its central 2 longitudinal septa, whereas in S. hyphantoseptum the posteriormost 3–6 transverse septa are overlapped by most of its eight longitudinal septa. The number of loculi that are wider than long in the anterior region of bothridia is also different between the two species (6–8 in S. hyphantoseptum vs 10–12 in S. campbelli ).

In terms of proglottid morphology, S. hyphantoseptum sp. n. can be distinguished from S. ashleyae , S. davidcynthiaorum and S. campbelli in its possession of a uterus that extends to the posterior margin of the proglottid ( Fig. 8C View Fig ), whereas in the latter three species the uterus only extends posteriorly to the ovarian isthmus ( Figs. 4C View Fig , 6C View Fig ; not illustrated for S. ashleyae , but observed).

Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum is the only species of Stillabothrium reported from a species of Pastinachus Rüppell. The host species, P. solocirostris (roughnose stingray) was described by Last et al. (2005) as part of the same survey work that made the current study possible.

Two specimens of S. hyphantoseptum were included in the phylogenetic analysis ( Fig. 1 View Fig , Table 1 View Table 1 ).

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF