Paraleptuca Bott, 1973
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5355087 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:80EBB258-0F6A-4FD6-9886-8AFE317C25F6 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EB2F66-9322-2011-FF50-FC55CF72FCC0 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Paraleptuca Bott, 1973 |
status |
|
Paraleptuca Bott, 1973 View in CoL , status nov.
( Fig. 10C, D View Fig )
Paraleptuca Bott, 1973b: 322 View in CoL . Type species: Gelasimus chlorophthalmus H. Milne Edwards, 1837 View in CoL , by original designation. Gender feminine.
Amphiuca Crane, 1975:96 View in CoL . Type species: Gelasimus chlorophthalmus H. Milne Edwards, 1837 View in CoL , by original designation. Gender feminine.
Diagnosis. Medium-sized species (carapace width about 20 mm in adults); dorsal carapace with posterolateral striae; front broad; cornea round; eyestalks slender; adult male chelipeds extremely large, right- or left-handed, pollex without ventral carina, outer surface of major manus smooth, with small round depression near base of pollex, carpal cavity not continued distally; male pleonites free; with pleonal clasping apparatus; gastric mill without large brownish setae at base of posterior tooth plate. Indo-west Pacific.
Species included:
1. Paraleptuca crassipes ( White, 1847)
= Gelasimus gaimardi H. Milne Edwards, 1852
= Gelasimus pulchellus Stimpson, 1858
= Gelasimus latreillei H. Milne Edwards, 1852
= Uca novaeguineae Rathbun, 1913
2. Paraleptuca boninensis ( Shih, Komai & Liu, 2013)
3. Paraleptuca chlorophthalmus (H. Milne Edwards, 1837) = Uca amazonensis Doflein, 1899
4. Paraleptuca splendida ( Stimpson, 1858)
Remarks. In Crane’s (1975) system, Amphiuca (= Paraleptuca ) contained four taxa, viz., Uca chlorophthalmus , U. crassipes , U. inversa and U. sindensis . In contrast, Beinlich & von Hagen (2006) established Cranuca for U. inversa , and believed that the members of the U. lactea and U. triangularis species complexes should be included within their revised concept of Paraleptuca . However, this has not been supported genetically ( Shih et al., 2013b; Fig. 2 View Fig ). Uca sindensis has since been transferred to Austruca ( Shih et al., 2013b; Fig. 2 View Fig ); while P. boninensis and P. splendida have now been added to Paraleptuca ( Shih et al., 2012, 2013a).
The revised concept of Paraleptuca here shows considerable variation in morphology and coloration among the four species ( Crane, 1975; Shih et al., 2012, 2013a), perhaps due in part to their unusual distributions ( Fig. 4 View Fig ). Paraleptuca chlorophthalmus occurs only in East Africa; P. crassipes is widely distributed across the IWP; P. splendida is restricted to East Asia and Vietnam; and P. boninensis is endemic to the Ogasawara Islands (= Bonin Island), Japan. The latter species is morphologically closest to P. splendida , but genetically (16S and COI), it is nearly identical to P. crassipes . Only the sequences from the mitochondrial control region (= D-loop) can separate the species satisfactorily ( Shih et al., 2013a). This is a strong indication that it is a young species that evolved very recently.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Paraleptuca Bott, 1973
Shih, Hsi-Te, Ng, Peter K. L., Davie, Peter J. F., Schubart, Christoph D., Türkay, Michael, Naderloo, Reza, Jones, Diana & Liu, Min-Yun 2016 |
Amphiuca
Crane J 1975: 96 |
Paraleptuca
Bott R 1973: 322 |