Oreo, PLATNICK, 2002
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090(2002)271<0001:AROTAG>2.0.CO;2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EAE52A-FF97-A669-80FB-231CDE0A4945 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Oreo |
status |
|
KEY TO SPECIES OF OREO
1. Males............................. 2
– Females (those of O. muncoonie and O. kidman unknown).................... 6
2. Two retrolateral tibial apophyses (as in figs. 126, 130)........................ 3
– One retrolateral tibial apophysis (as in figs. 134, 138)........................ 5
3. Tegulum with wide ridge situated posteriorly of translucent median apophysis (figs. 121, 125)............................ 4
– Tegulum with narrow ridge (fig. 129)................................. kidman
4. Tegular ridge expanded, crenulate prolaterally (fig. 125)................ muncoonie
– Tegular ridge not expanded, crenulate prolaterally (fig. 121)............. renmark
5. Embolus relatively short (fig. 133)................................. capensis
– Embolus relatively long (fig. 137)................................. bushbay
6. Posterior epigynal ducts, as viewed ventrally, yshaped (fig. 135).......... capensis
– Posterior epigynal ducts otherwise...... 7
7. Posterior portion of spermathecae highly crenulated (fig. 124)......... renmark
– Posterior portion of spermathecae only slightly crenulated (fig. 140)....... bushbay
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.