Imitoceras initium, Korn & Weyer, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.882.2177 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:67C909E4-C700-4F8D-B8CE-5FD9B2C5D549 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8184424 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F4100C55-64E5-48AF-8EDC-87CDA35580F1 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:F4100C55-64E5-48AF-8EDC-87CDA35580F1 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Imitoceras initium |
status |
sp. nov. |
Imitoceras initium sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:F4100C55-64E5-48AF-8EDC-87CDA35580F1
Fig. 65 View Fig ; Table 63
Diagnosis
Species of Imitoceras with a conch reaching 60 mm diameter. Conch at 50 mm dm discoidal, involute (ww/dm ~0.45; uw/dm ~0.05); whorl profile at 30 mm dm weakly compressed (ww/wh ~0.75); coiling rate very high (WER ~2.30). Venter rounded, umbilical margin rounded, flanks strongly convergent. Growth lines very fine, narrow-standing, with slightly biconvex course. Weak constrictions on the shell surface of the inner flank. Suture line with a weakly pouched external lobe and a V-shaped adventive lobe.
Etymology
After Latin ‘ initium ’ = ‘the beginning’; because of the position of the species at the base of a long-ranging evolutionary lineage.
Material examined
Holotype
GERMANY • Rhenish Mountains , Oberrödinghausen, west of railway cutting; Hangenberg Limestone, loose material; Korn 1977 Coll.; illustrated in Fig. 65 View Fig ; MB.C.31144.
Description
Holotype MB.C.31144 is well preserved and has a conch diameter of 52 mm ( Fig. 65A View Fig ). It is thinly discoid with a slightly opened umbilicus (ww/dm = 0.43; uw/dm = 0.05) and has a compressed whorl profile that is widest at the rounded umbilical margin; it has fairly strongly converging flanks and a rounded venter. The coiling rate is very high (WER = 2.30). The shell bears barely visible, extremely faint growth lines with a biconvex course and also a shell constriction limited to the inner flank. The suture line has a weakly pouched external lobe that is about two-thirds the depth of the nearly symmetric V-shaped adventive lobe ( Fig. 65B View Fig ).
Remarks
The occurrence of the genus Imitoceras in the Gattendorfia Limestone near Oberrödinghausen was previously unknown, but is actually not a great surprise. Representatives of Imitoceras have already been found together with early Tournaisian ammonoids in Guizhou ( Sun & Shen 1965; Ruan 1981), originally described as “ Imitoceras planolobatum ” and “ Imitoceras (Imitoceras) crassum ”, and the Anti-Atlas ( Bockwinkel & Ebbighausen 2006).
The only specimen available is unique in the ammonoid assemblage from Oberrödinghausen because of its high coiling rate of 2.30. Such a value is rarely reached by other members of the prionoceratid ammonoids. In the subfamily Acutimitoceratinae , the whorl expansion rate is normally between 1.70 and 1.90 in Stockumites and between 1.90 and 2.05 in Nicimitoceras .
Of these genera, only Nicimitoceras has a short external lobe like in Imitoceras initium sp. nov. However, I. initium is stouter than the size-equivalent holotypes of other Nicimitoceras species from Oberrödinghausen: its ww/dm ratio is 0.43 at 52 mm dm in I. initium , while the value in N. heterolobatum , for example, is 0.36 at 54 mm dm. In addition, the whorl profile shows rapidly converging flanks in I. initium , which tend to be subparallel in species of Nicimitoceras .
A superficially similar species to Imitoceras initium sp. nov. is Acutimitoceras procedens from the Stockum limestone equivalent of the Müssenberg ( Korn 1981). This also shows a high coiling rate, rapidly convergent flanks, and a shell ornament with weak growth lines and constrictions. The holotype of this species is much stouter (ww/dm = 0.54 at 33 mm dm) than holotype MB.C.31144 of A. initium (ww/dm = 0.43 at 52 mm dm). This difference cannot be explained by the advanced ontogenetic evolution towards a more slender conch in specimen MB.C.31144, as this has half a whorl in front of the largest diameter, a ww/dm ratio of only 0.47 at 36 mm conch diameter.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |