Macrophya montana (Scopoli, 1763)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.282414 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2247D9E8-00C0-49E0-A4FC-C383E80F664C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5691265 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E9CE48-FFBB-FF81-FF71-F9C27CD800E2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Macrophya montana (Scopoli, 1763) |
status |
|
Macrophya montana (Scopoli, 1763)
( Figs. 6 View FIGURES 4 – 6 , 12 View FIGURES 7 – 12 , 17 View FIGURES 13 – 17 )
Material examined. Bohemia centr.: Milovice (5755), 11.ix.2004, 5 larvae on Rubus fruticosus ; Lipovka NR (5854), 25.ix.2005, 8 larvae on Rubus fruticosus ; Karlštejn NNR (6051), 27.viii.2010, 4 larvae on Rubus fruticosus .
Notes on identification. The larva was described by Lorenz & Kraus (1957). The last instar larva is distinguished from the very similar larva of M. rufipes by the narrow, simple dorsal longitudinal dark stripe. Moreover, it is a silvicolous species occurring in deciduous or mixed forests with Rubus ground layer, in contrast to the xerophilous M. rufipes which prefers open shrubby grasslands.
Discussion. Benson (1952) first mentioned Rubus caesius as the larval food plant. I collected the larvae only on Rubus fruticosus in the shrub layer of deciduous and mixed forests.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |