Diacyclops huntervalleyensis, Karanovic, 2024

Karanovic, Tomislav, 2024, Six new species of Diacyclops (Copepoda: Cyclopoida) from Australia, Zootaxa 5541 (2), pp. 101-143 : 132-135

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5541.2.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:86A7CD79-F5A2-4AA6-A6AA-01C0CB64B29C

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14248351

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E8C55F-9C15-FFF4-FF0B-90CCFEB86713

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Diacyclops huntervalleyensis
status

sp. nov.

Diacyclops huntervalleyensis sp. nov.

( Figs. 1F View FIGURE 1 , 26 View FIGURE 26 , 27 View FIGURE 27 )

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:D142C1FE-BE38-4935-9261-0F360A8EBEC6

Type locality. Australia, New South Wales, Hunter Valley, bore80071,sample no.2HD45, 32.006601°S 150.86074°E, 5 July 2005, collected by P. Hancock. GoogleMaps

Holotype. Adult female dissected on one microscope slide GoogleMaps .

Paratypes. One male and 2 females from type locality dissected on 1 microscope slide each; 5 males, 10 females, and 2 copepodids from type locality in 1 alcohol vial GoogleMaps ; 1 male and 3 females from bore 80439, Hunter Valley , New South Wales, 32.04921°S 150.94307°E, sample no. 2HD 52, 6 July 2005, collected by P. Hancock, on 1 SEM stub (row no. 2), together with five other species described here GoogleMaps ; 8 males, 13 females, and 2 copepodids from bore 80439 (see above) in 1 alcohol vial; GoogleMaps 72 males, 104 females, and 61 copepodids from bore 80439 (see above), but collected on 3 April 2005 by P. hancock, in 1 alcohol vial GoogleMaps .

Etymology. The species name refers to its type locality, Hunter Valley, which was named after Hunter River, which was in turn named in 1797 after Captain John Hunter, who was at that time Governor of the British colony in New South Wales. It is an adjective for place, made with the Latin suffix “ -ensis ”.

Diagnosis. Female. Body length from 340 to 360 µm. Habitus ( Figs. 1F View FIGURE 1 , 27A View FIGURE 27 ) slender, 3.4 times as long as wide, with prosome/urosome ratio of 1.2, and cephalothorax twice as wide as genital double-somite in dorsal view. Integument on all somites ( Fig. 27A, C, F View FIGURE 27 ) thin and smooth, with light bacterial cover; general distribution of spinules and cuticular pores on somites as in D. leijsi . Hyaline fringes of prosomites ( Fig. 27A View FIGURE 27 ) and urosomites ( Fig. 26A View FIGURE 26 ) smooth. Genital double-somite ( Figs. 26A View FIGURE 26 , 27A View FIGURE 27 ) slightly wider than long in ventral view, widest at first third of its length and gradually tapering posteriorly, widest part about 1.5 times as wide as posterior margin; seminal receptacle smallest of all species described here, almost without posterior part, in shape most similar to that in D. tomlinsonae ; copulatory pore small and located at about 2 fifths of somite length; copulatory duct wide, long, and well-sclerotized. Anal somite ( Figs. 26A View FIGURE 26 , 27C View FIGURE 27 ) with large spinules along ventral and lateral margins. Caudal rami ( Figs. 26A View FIGURE 26 , 27D View FIGURE 27 ) of medium length and stout, narrowly spaced, about 3 times as long as wide and about twice as long as anal somite; principal terminal setae with breaking planes, inner one about 0.7 times as long as entire urosome and 1.35 times as long as outer one; dorsal seta about 1.25 times as long as caudal ramus, 3.1 times as long as innermost terminal seta, and 3.4 times as long as outermost terminal seta. Antennula ( Fig. 26B View FIGURE 26 ) 10-segmented, half as long as cephalothorax, with single aesthetasc on penultimate segment and setae formula 8.4.8.5.2.2.2.2.2.8; ultimate segment about 1.3 times as long as wide. Antenna ( Figs. 26C View FIGURE 26 , 27B View FIGURE 27 ) 5-segmented, without exopodal seta, with setae formula 0.1.1.5.7; second segment about 1.6 times as long as fifth segment. Labrum ( Fig. 24E View FIGURE 24 ) with 2 diagonal rows of 8 slender spinules each on anterior surface and row of minute spinules on blunt lateral conrers; cutting edge slightly concave, with 15 sharp teeth. Mandibula ( Fig. 26E View FIGURE 26 ), maxillula ( Figs. 26F View FIGURE 26 , 27B View FIGURE 27 ), maxilla ( Figs. 26G View FIGURE 26 , 27B View FIGURE 27 ), and maxilliped ( Figs. 26H View FIGURE 26 , 27B View FIGURE 27 ) as in D. tomlinsonae . Shape, segmentation, and armature of swimming legs ( Figs. 26I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P View FIGURE 26 , 27B, E View FIGURE 27 ) as in D. tomlinsonae , except first exopodal segment of second to fourth legs with inner seta; third endopodal segment of fourth leg 1.3 times as long as wide; its outer spine about as long as segment and twice as long as inner spine. Fifth leg ( Fig. 26A View FIGURE 26 ) and sixth leg ( Fig. 27F View FIGURE 27 ) as in D. tomlinsonae .

Male. Body length from 330 to 355 µm. Habitus and urosome ( Fig. 26R View FIGURE 26 ) slightly slenderer than in female; free genital somite ( Fig. 26R View FIGURE 26 ) less than 1.3 times as wide as subsequent urosomite, with small ovoid spermatophores. Ornamentation of cephalothorax, free prosomites, and last 3 urosomites as in female. Caudal rami ( Fig. 26R View FIGURE 26 ) slightly slenderer than in female, but proportion of setae without any significant difference. Antennula ( Fig. 26S View FIGURE 26 ) segmentation, armature, and proportions as in D. tomlinsonae ; penultimate segment about as long as wide.Antenna, labrum, mandibula, maxillula, maxilla, maxilliped, all swimming legs ( Fig. 26T View FIGURE 26 ), and fifth leg ( Fig. 26R View FIGURE 26 ) as in female. Sixth leg ( Fig. 26R View FIGURE 26 ) similar to that in D. tomlinsonae , but cuticular plate shorter and with nearly straight posterior margin.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Copepoda

Order

Cyclopoida

Family

Cyclopidae

Genus

Diacyclops

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF