Edaphochlamys debaryana (Goroschankin) Pröschold & Darienko
comb. nov.
Basionym:
Chlamydomonas debaryana Goroschankin (1891)
, Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. Moscou, N.S. 5: 106–108, fig. 9–12.
Comment: All strains designated as
C. debaryana
were almost identical in morphology and SSU and ITS rDNA sequences. Only the strain SAG 70.81 differed from
C. debaryana
as shown in Fig. 3
View FIGURE 3
. This strain could be preliminary identified as
C. cf. latifrons
; however, this needs further studies.
As demonstrated in our study, unicellular genera
Chlamydomonas
View in CoL
and
Edaphochlamys
are closely related to the colonial genera of the
Goniaceae
View in CoL
,
Tetrabaenaceae
View in CoL
, and
Volvocaceae
View in CoL
. The
Goniaceae
View in CoL
include the genera
Gonium
View in CoL
and
Astrephomene ( Nozaki & Kuroiwa, 1992)
View in CoL
, the
Tetrabaenaceae
View in CoL
the genera
Basichlamys
View in CoL
and
Tetrabaena ( Nozaki & Ito, 1994)
View in CoL
. Both families were considered as intermediate families between unicellular taxa such as
Chlamydomonas
View in CoL
and the
Volvocaceae
View in CoL
, which comprises the colonial genera
Pandorina
View in CoL
,
Volvulina
View in CoL
,
Yamagishiella
View in CoL
,
Eudorina
View in CoL
,
Platydorina
View in CoL
,
Colemanosphaera
View in CoL
,
Pleodorina
View in CoL
, and
Volvox
View in CoL
( Nozaki et al., 2000, Nozaki, 2003, Nozaki et al., 2014). However, in contrast to the phylogenies using chloroplast genes, where
Chlamydomonas
View in CoL
and Vitreochlamys species were often at the base of the Volvocales sensu stricto, the phylogenetic analyses of SSU and ITS rDNA sequences always demonstrated that the unicellular taxa are distributed among the colonial lineages ( Nakada et al., 2016; this study). Our study here revealed five lineages (
Chlamydomonas
View in CoL
,
Edaphochlamys
,
Tetrabaenaceae
View in CoL
,
Goniaceae
View in CoL
, and
Volvocaceae
View in CoL
) among the Core-Reinhardtinia, four of them are highly supported in bootstrap and Bayesian analyses. Only the family
Goniaceae
View in CoL
(* in Figs 3–4
View FIGURE 3
View FIGURE 4
) was not supported in our analyses. The genera
Chlamydomonas
View in CoL
and
Edaphochlamys
were topologically sisters of the families
Goniaceae
View in CoL
/
Volvocaceae
View in CoL
and
Tetrabaenaceae
View in CoL
, respectively. These results were partially confirmed by the activity tests of gamete lytic enzymes (GLE) derived from
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
. In these tests the GLE dissolved not only the cell walls of several Chlamydomonas species such as
C. reinhardtii
,
C. incerta
, and partly
C. debaryana
(only SAG 26.72, but no reaction by SAG 4.72 and SAG 14.72), it also degraded those of the colonial genera
Gonium
View in CoL
,
Astrephomene
View in CoL
,
Basichlamys
View in CoL
(=
Gonium sacculiferum
), and
Tetrabaena
View in CoL
(=
Gonium sociale
; Matsuda et al., 1987, Matsuda, 1988). All these data indicated the close relationship of these taxa. In contrast, the gamete autolysin had no influence on the other colonial
Volvocaceae
View in CoL
.
However, these results raised the question of why the phylogenetic analyses using nuclear and plastid-coding genes showed different tree topologies. Possible explanations are: (1) The phylogenies of nuclear and plastid-coding genes were based on different data sets. Unfortunately, no congruent alignments including sequences of the same strains have been available until now. (2) Nuclear and chloroplast genes of unicellular and colonial taxa have different evolutionary rates. Whereas the nuclear genes appear to evolve at similar rates, the plastid-coding genes evolved differently among unicellular and colonial species. To address these questions further, we created small congruent datasets (ITS and rbc L) of representatives of all lineages and analyzed them separately ( Fig. 4
View FIGURE 4
). The analyses of both datasets clearly showed different tree topologies. The ITS phylogeny revealed five clades, which represented the three families (the
Goniaceae
View in CoL
is only weakly supported) and the two genera
Chlamydomonas
View in CoL
and
Edaphochlamys
. In contrast to highly or moderately supported lineages using ITS, the rbc L phylogeny did not show this topology and most lineages were not supported by bootstrap and Bayesian analyses. This clearly demonstrated that rbc L is too conserved to achieve a robust phylogenetic resolution. For better understanding of the plastid-coding genes, we re-analyzed the datasets used by Nakada et al. (2016) separately and concatenated (see Figs S1
View FIGURE 1
; Supplemental Material). The third codon positions were excluded from these analyses because these positions were saturated. The tree topologies using rbc L, atp B, psa A, psa B, and psb C were very different and showed no or only weak support for genera and families. These results were probably caused by different evolutionary rates of each gene and low genetic variations among the plastid-coding genes. The concatenated dataset of all genes also revealed high support for only some of the genera and lineages. As Wang et al. (2014) and references therein highlighted, if the tree topologies of single genes differ significantly, then the gene sequences should not be combined in a concatenated dataset. This resulted in incongruent species trees, which is caused by different genetic history of the selected genes. As consequence of our study, the nuclear SSU and ITS sequences combined in a concatenated dataset produce a much better resolution and therefore should be preferred for taxonomy of the volvocalean algae.