Arcotheres placunicola Ng, 2018a

Ng, Peter K. L. & Ahyong, Shane T., 2022, The pea crab genus Arcotheres Manning, 1993 (Crustacea: Brachyura: Pinnotheridae) from Singapore and Peninsular Malaysia, with a reappraisal of diagnostic characters and descriptions of two new genera, Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 70, pp. 134-248 : 207-215

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.26107/RBZ-2022-0009

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BE6164AE-1C24-4E01-8B7B-D80764F147B3

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E887D8-CE38-FF80-34A4-1E32D3CA7D3E

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Arcotheres placunicola Ng, 2018a
status

 

Arcotheres placunicola Ng, 2018a View in CoL

( Figs. 57–62 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig )

Pinnotheres similis View in CoL — Tesch, 1918: 254 (list); Gordon, 1936: 172, fig. 3 ( Singapore); Silas & Alagarswami, 1967: 1210 (list) (not Pinnotheres similis Bürger, 1895 View in CoL ).

Arcotheres palaensis View in CoL — Pohle & Marques, 1998: 231 (part) (not Pinnotheres palaensis Bürger, 1895 View in CoL ).

Arcotheres placunicola Ng, 2018a: 475 View in CoL , figs. 1–6 [type locality: Changi, Singapore]; De Gier & Becker, 2020: tab. 1.

Type material. Holotype: ovigerous female (11.2 × 8.6 mm) ( ZRC 2017.1009 View Materials ), off Changi beach, next to Carpark 7, near ferry terminal, 1.374223°N, 104.006827°E, coll. S. K. Tan et al., 7 June 2016 GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 5 males (5.6 × 4.7 mm, 4.7 × 4.1 mm, 4.0 × 3.7 mm, 3.9 × 3.6 mm, 3.6 × 3.4 mm), 4 ovigerous females (10.4 × 8.3 mm, 8.7 × 7.5 mm, 7.5 × 6.1 mm, 7.0 × 5.5 mm), 1 female (8.8 × 6.9 mm), 3 females (with rhizocephalans) (8.6 × 6.3 mm, 8.6 × 7.1 mm, 9.0 × 6.9 mm), 2 juvenile females (3.6 × 2.9 mm, 6.2 × 5.1 mm) ( ZRC 2017.1010 View Materials ), same data as holotype GoogleMaps ; 14 males (largest 5.1 × 4.4 mm, smallest 2.4 × 2.3 mm), 2 males (with rhizocephalans) (5.7 × 4.7 mm, 5.5 × 5.0 mm), 16 ovigerous females (largest 10 × 8.7 mm, smallest 7.7 × 6.3 mm), 1 ovigerous female (10.1 × 8.0 mm), 10 non-ovigerous females (largest 10.3 × 7.8 mm, smallest 5.4 × 4.5 mm), 2 females (with rhizocephalan) (6.3 × 4.9 mm, 7.8 × 5.8 mm), 1 juvenile female (3.8 × 3.7 mm) ( ZRC 2017.1012 View Materials ), off Changi beach, next to Carpark 7, near ferry terminal, 1.374223°N, 104.006827°E, coll. S. K. Tan et al., 8 June 2016 GoogleMaps ; 1 male (4.2 × 3.8 mm), 2 ovigerous females (7.2 × 6.1 mm, 7.5 × 6.2 mm) ( ZRC 2012.432 View Materials ), off Changi beach, next to Carpark 7, near ferry terminal, 1.374223°N, 104.006827°E, coll. P. K. L. Ng et al., 5 July 2012 GoogleMaps ; 4 ovigerous females (largest 9.1 × 7.4 mm, smallest 6.5 × 5.4 mm), 3 non-ovigerous females (largest 8.9 × 6.9 mm, smallest 8.1 × 6.7 mm), 2 females (with rhizocephalan) (8.2 × 7.3 mm, 11.2 × 9.1 mm) ( ZRC 2017.1013 View Materials ), off Changi beach, next to Carpark 7, near ferry terminal, 1.374223°N, 104.006827°E, coll. P. K. L. Ng & P. Y. C. Ng, June 2016 GoogleMaps ; 2 males (2.2 × 2.2 mm, 2.4 × 2.4 mm) ( ZRC 2017.1014 View Materials ), Tanah Merah Ferry Terminal Beach, near Changi Point, coll. S. K. Tan et al., 17 November 2016 ; 1 male (with rhizocephalan) (5.6 × 5.1 mm), 3 ovigerous females (7.3 × 5.9 mm, 8.0 × 6.1 mm, 9.5 × 7.2 mm), 1 non-ovigerous female (with rhizocephalan) (9.0 × 7.4 mm) ( ZRC 2017.1015 View Materials ), off Changi beach, next to Carpark 7, near ferry terminal, 1.374223°N, 104.006827°E, coll. P. K. L. Ng & P. Y. C. Ng, 31 March 2017 GoogleMaps ; 1 male (with Sacculina ) (4.8 × 4.5 mm) ( ZRC 2017.1016 View Materials ), off Changi beach, adjacent to National Service Recreational Country Club, coll. H. H. Tan et al., 26 May 2017 ; 4 females, 1 juvenile female ( ZRC 2017.1011 View Materials ) , 1 male, 2 ovigerous females ( AM P105907 ), off Changi beach, next to Carpark 7, near ferry terminal, 1.374223°N, 104.006827°E, coll. S. K. Tan et al., 5 July 2017 GoogleMaps ; 1 male (with rhizocephalan), 3 females ( AM P105908 ), intertidal area, off Changi beach, next to Carpark 7, near ferry terminal, 1.374223°N, 104.006827°E, coll. S. K. Tan et al., 26 June 2017 GoogleMaps ; 1 female ( ZRC 2017.1265 View Materials ), Telok Paku , beach, in “ Placuna sella ”, coll. 8 April 1965 . All locations in Singapore .

Other material examined. Singapore: 3 males, 6 females ( ZRC 2019.1113 View Materials ), probably in Placuna ephippium , intertidal area, off Changi beach, next to Carpark 7, near ferry terminal, 1.374223°N, 104.006827°E, Singapore, coll. P. K. L. Ng et al., 3 August 2012 GoogleMaps ; 1 female ( ZRC 2019.1021 View Materials ), intertidal area, off Changi beach, next to Carpark 6, Singapore, coll. H. H. Tan et al., 24 December 2018 ; 1 female ( ZRC 2019.1037 View Materials ), intertidal area, off Changi beach, next to Carpark 7, near ferry terminal, 1.374223°N, 104.006827°E, Singapore, coll. H. H. Tan et al., 4 July 2019 GoogleMaps ; 1 female (11.6 × 8.6 mm), 1 juvenile female ( ZRC 2021.80 View Materials ), inside Placuna ephippium, Changi Bay , ex Red Cliff Shoal area , Singapore, coll. S. K. Tan et al., 13 January 2021 . Peninsular Malaysia: 1 male (3.7 × 3.3 mm) ( ZRC 2021.802 View Materials , ex part ZRC 2000.2613 View Materials ), Batu Pahat , Johor, supposedly from Tegillarca granosa , mangroves, coll. H. K. Tan, 16 August 1983 ; 1 male, 3 females, 1 juvenile female ( ZRC 2009.905 View Materials ), supposedly from Tegillarca , Pahang, coll. students, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 2006 .

Description. Carapace and pereopods well chitinised. Female: Carapace subcircular to subhexagonal, distinctly wider than long; dorsal and lateral surfaces smooth, glabrous; front usually projecting anteriorly beyond orbits, entire, margin slightly convex; anterior quarter of anterolateral margin gently sloping posteriorly, forming angle with rest of convex margin ( Fig. 58A View Fig ). Eyes small, not visible in dorsal view; mobile, completely filling orbit ( Fig. 58A–C View Fig ). Epistome with median part triangular, lateral margins gently concave ( Fig. 58C View Fig ).

MXP3 outer surface with scattered short setae; ischiomerus completely fused, subrhomboidal, inner margin angular at widest point; carpus short; propodus about 3 times as long as high, subspatulate, distinctly longer than carpus; dactylus slender, inserted at midlength of propodus, tip not reaching propodal apex; exopod relatively slender, about one-third length of ischiomerus, flagellum 2-segmented ( Fig. 59A, B View Fig ).

Chela slender, dactylus almost two-thirds palm length; palm slender, proximally narrower than distally; outer surface of palm, fingers (except for distal part) almost glabrous, with only scattered short setae; dactylus occlusal margin with large subproximal tooth; pollex occlusal margin with 1 low proximal tooth, 1 submedian tooth; tips of fingers sharp, hooked ( Figs. 58D View Fig , 59C View Fig ).

P2–P5 dorsally, ventrally unarmed; outer surface covered with scattered, very short setae or glabrous; ventral margins of propodus and dactylus more setose; merus relatively longer, more slender, relative lengths of meri P4>P3>P5>P2; left (sometimes right) P4 distinctly the longer; P2 and P3 dactyli short, subequal, tip gently hooked, half propodus length; P4 dactylus elongate, weakly falciform, three-fourths propodus length, longer than P2 and P3 dactyli, shorter than P5 dactylus; P5 merus 4.3–4.4 times longer than wide; P5 dactylus longest, longer than propodus, distal half covered with short setae, ventral margin of distal part with 2 rows of up to 11 spinules each, lower row usually with few spinules, lower and upper rows with subequal number of spinules ( Fig. 50D–K View Fig ”).

Pleon extending to buccal region, covering bases of P2–P5; telson recessed into distal margin of somite 6 ( Fig. 58B View Fig ).

Male: Carapace almost circular, slightly wider than long; dorsal surface covered with scattered short setae or smooth, slightly convex to almost flat; front distinctly projecting anteriorly, margin gently sinuous ( Figs. 60A, D View Fig , 62A View Fig ). Eyes distinctly visible in dorsal view ( Figs. 60A, D View Fig , 62A View Fig ). MXP3 as in female ( Figs. 61D View Fig , 62C View Fig ). Anterior thoracic sternum wide, sternites 1, 2 fused, partially sunken into buccal cavity; suture between sternites 2 and 3 shallow; sternites 3, 4 completely fused, separated only by shallow grooves; sternopleonal cavity reaching to junction between sternites 3 and 4. Chela relatively stouter, shorter than in female, tip of fingers longer ( Figs. 60C, F View Fig , 61A View Fig , 62D View Fig ). P2–P5 dorsally, ventrally unarmed; outer surface covered with short setae; carpus and propodus with long natatory setae; left and right meri equal, relative lengths of meri P4>P3>P2>P5; dactyli of P2–P4 progressively longer; left (sometimes right) P4 dactylus slightly longer, more slender than right side; P4 and P5 dactyli subequal to that of P3, completely covered with short setae ( Figs. 61E–L View Fig , 62E View Fig –L’); P5 dactylus with 2 rows of up to 11 or 12 distoflexor spinules each ( Figs. 60H View Fig , 61L View Fig ). Pleon slender, triangular, widest at somite 3, lateral margins of somite 4 distinctly concave, tapering distally to telson; telson subquadrate-linguiform with convex lateral margins, wider than long ( Figs. 61B, C View Fig , 62B View Fig ). G1 relatively stout, arcuate, curved outwards, short extended tip gently curved upwards or straight ( Figs. 60G View Fig , 61M, N, Q View Fig , 62M, N View Fig ). G2 short, with spatuliform tip; exopod almost as long as endopod ( Figs. 61O, P View Fig , 62O View Fig ).

Variation. Several female specimens have the frontal margin weakly projecting, being almost level with the anterolateral margin, making the carapace appear more evenly ovate ( Fig. 58A View Fig ). Significantly, the male pleon changes shape (notably somite 6 and telson) with size, with somite 6 becoming proportionally narrower and the telson less tapering with increasing body size ( Figs. 61B, C View Fig , 62B View Fig ). The G 1 in A. placunicola varies slightly, with the tapering tip generally longer in larger males ( Fig. 61M, N View Fig ) and relatively shorter in some smaller males ( Fig. 61Q View Fig ), but also sometimes long in small specimens ( Figs. 60G View Fig , 62M, N View Fig ).

Colour. Rather variable: females pale yellow to orange or dirty white with brown patterns; males more uniform brown to greenish brown ( Fig. 57F View Fig ).

Host. Known with certainty only from Placuna ephippium (Philipsson, 1788) ( Placunidae Rafinesque, 1815 ). One lot (ZRC 2009.905) of A. placunicola collected in 2006 from Pahang, Malaysia, as part of aquaculture surveys by students from the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, were labelled as collected from “ Anadara ”. We suspect the host was incorrectly recorded.

Remarks. Arcotheres placunicola most closely resembles A. palaensis and A. similis , with which it has been confused (see Ng, 2018a). Arcotheres placunicola and A. similis are superficially similar, with similar MXP3 and P5 morphology, so the two species can be easily mistaken if not examined carefully. The female carapaces of the two species are superficially similar but can usually be distinguished, especially with fresh material. In A. placunicola ( Figs. 57A–D View Fig , 58A View Fig ), the carapace shape is more polygonal, with the anterolateral corners of the carapace bluntly angular, contrasting with the more rounded carapace of A. similis ( Figs. 27A, C View Fig , 28A, C View Fig ), in which the anterolateral corners are evenly curved. As discussed earlier, carapace shape can change to varying degrees when preserved. That being said, there is some overlap in carapace shape between the two species, so other characters must also be checked to confirm identifications. The female P2 and P3 dactyli also differ in shape, being evenly curved in A. similis ( Fig. 30A, B, E, F View Fig ), and tightly curved distally with a more falcate apex in A. placunicola ( Fig. 59D, E, H, I View Fig ). While the P5 dactylus of both species possess two rows of distoflexor spinules, in A. placunicola , the lower row is shorter and usually has only a few more spinules than the upper row, the two rows often with subequal numbers of more closely packed spinules ( Fig. 59 View Fig G’, K’, K”). In A. similis , on the other hand, the lower row is almost always long, with distinctly more, widely spaced spinules ( Fig. 30 View Fig D’, H’, L).

Males of A. placunicola and A. similis are quite different. Compared to A. similis , the carapace of A. placunicola is distinctly more transversely ovate with the dorsal surface gently convex to almost flat ( Figs. 60A, B, E View Fig , 62A View Fig ) (versus carapace round or longitudinally ovate with the dorsal surface inflated and distinctly convex in A. similis ; Figs. 31A, B, D View Fig , 32A View Fig ). The G1 of A. placunicola and A. similis are superficially similar, but that of A. placunicola is more evenly curved with the slender apical projection directed oblique to the main axis ( Figs. 60G View Fig , 61M, N, Q View Fig , 62M, N View Fig ), while in A. similis , the median and subdistal parts are almost straight and the apical projection almost in line with the main axis ( Figs. 32L–N View Fig , 33E–H, J, K View Fig ). Arcotheres placunicola closely resembles A. palaensis in the structure of the carapace, P2 and P3 dactyli, MXP3, and G1, but adults can be distinguished by the relatively longer P2–P5 (P5 merus 4.3–4.4 times longer than wide, versus 3.6–4.0 times in A. palaensis ) and by the P5 dactylus possessing two rows of distoflexor spinules ( Fig. 59 View Fig G’, K’, K”) (versus absent in A. palaensis ). The adult chela is also usually relatively longer and more slender in A. placunicola , with the proximal part more narrow than the distal section ( Fig. 59C View Fig ); it is often proportionately and evenly stouter in A. palaensis ( Figs. 5D View Fig , 6D View Fig ), although the palm may also be elongated ( Fig. 4A, B View Fig ; Ahyong & Ng, 2007b: fig. 9B). The MXP3 of A. placunicola usually has a proportionately shorter dactylus ( Fig. 59A, B View Fig ), but it varies too much in A. palaensis ( Fig. 13 View Fig ) to reliably distinguish the two species. The G1 of A. placunicola and A. palaensis are also superficially similar, although that of A. placunicola is slightly more curved as well as relatively shorter and stouter ( Figs. 60G View Fig , 61M, N, Q View Fig , 62M, N View Fig ) (cf. Fig. 22K–M View Fig for A. palaensis ).

Arcotheres exiguus also superficially resembles A. placunicola , especially with regards to the general carapace shape and relatively longer P2–P5. Female A. placunicola , however, can be reliably distinguished by the P5 dactylus possessing a double row of subdistal spinules on the ventral margin ( Fig. 59 View Fig G’, K’, K”) (versus absent in A. exiguus ; Fig. 40G View Fig ); and the chela is often proportionately longer and more slender proximally than distally ( Figs. 58D View Fig , 59C View Fig ) (versus short and stout in A. exiguus ; Fig. 40C View Fig ). In addition, the frontal margin of A. placunicola is relatively wider and curves gently to join the anterolateral margin ( Fig. 58A View Fig ) (versus shorter frontal margin which joins lateral margins at a sharper angle in A. exiguus ; Fig. 40A View Fig ).

Distribution. South China Sea from Singapore and Peninsular Malaysia.

AM

Australian Museum

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Malacostraca

Order

Decapoda

Family

Pinnotheridae

Genus

Arcotheres

Loc

Arcotheres placunicola Ng, 2018a

Ng, Peter K. L. & Ahyong, Shane T. 2022
2022
Loc

Arcotheres placunicola

Ng PKL 2018: 475
2018
Loc

Arcotheres palaensis

Pohle G & Marques F 1998: 231
1998
Loc

Pinnotheres similis

Silas EG & Alagarswami K 1967: 1210
Gordon I 1936: 172
Tesch JJ 1918: 254
1918
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF