Canaima guaraque Huber, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.718.1101 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F9E9A91E-488C-4DB1-9361-E788E9AC5BC1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4343853 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C64AF2C8-4C26-4630-BF1B-85B163F9E225 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:C64AF2C8-4C26-4630-BF1B-85B163F9E225 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Canaima guaraque Huber |
status |
sp. nov. |
Canaima guaraque Huber View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:C64AF2C8-4C26-4630-BF1B-85B163F9E225
Figs 56–57 View Figs 50–57 , 89–92 View Figs 89–92 , 99–101 View Figs 93–101 , 1034
Diagnosis
Easily distinguished from known congeners by male pedipalp ( Figs 89–90 View Figs 89–92 ; long and slender procursus; complex embolar division with several distinctive processes), by male chelicerae ( Fig. 91 View Figs 89–92 ; pair of long frontal apophyses; similar only in C. loca Huber sp. nov.), and by internal female genitalia ( Figs 92 View Figs 89–92 , 101 View Figs 93–101 ): oval pore plates far apart, without tongue-shaped posterior membranous process and without anterior median receptacle; note that female of C. merida Huber, 2000 is unknown.
Etymology
The species name refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.
Type material
VENEZUELA – Mérida • ♂ holotype, ZFMK (Ar 21837), between Tovar and Guaraque (8.2578° N, 71.7184° W), 2490 m a.s.l., forest along stream, 11 Feb. 2020 (B.A. Huber, O. Villarreal M., Q. Arias C.) GoogleMaps .
Other material examined
VENEZUELA – Mérida • 1 ♂, 1 ♀, ZFMK (Ar 21838), and 1 ♀ in pure ethanol, ZFMK (Ven20-127), same collection data as for holotype GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 1.7, carapace width 0.75. Distance PME–PME 60 µm; diameter PME 70 µm; distance PME–ALE 60 µm; distance AME–AME ~ 10 µm; diameter AME ~ 10 µm (AME possibly non-functional). Leg 1: 11.5 (2.9 +0.2 +2.8+ 4.3+1.3), tibia 2: 1.7, tibia 3: 1.3, tibia 4: 1.5; tibia 1 L/d: 40.
COLOR (in ethanol). Carapace ochre-yellow, with light brown median and lateral bands connected posteriorly, ocular area and clypeus darker brown, sternum pale ochre to light brown; legs ochre-yellow, with slightly darker rings on femora (subdistally) and tibiae (proximally and subdistally); abdomen greenish-gray, with three pairs of dark bluish marks dorsally, dark mark in gonopore area.
BODY. Habitus as in Fig. 56 View Figs 50–57 . Ocular area slightly raised. Carapace with distinct thoracic groove. Clypeus with sclerotized rim but otherwise unmodified. Sternum wider than long (0.62/0.40), with pair of small but distinct anterior humps. Abdomen globular.
CHELICERAE. As in Fig. 91 View Figs 89–92 , with entapophyses of regular length and pair of long frontal apophyses overhanging fangs.
PALPS. As in Figs 89–90 View Figs 89–92 ; coxa with distinct retrolateral-ventral apophysis, trochanter barely modified, femur proximally with retrolateral process, distally with rounded retrolateral-ventral process; tibia very short, globular; procursus long and slender, widely curved; genital bulb with complex embolar division with several distinctive distal processes.
LEGS. Without spines and curved hairs; with higher than usual density of vertical hairs on tibiae; retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia 1 at 14%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1; tarsus 1 with ~18 pseudosegments, fairly distinct.
Male (variation)
Tibia 1 in second male: 2.6.
Female
In general similar to male ( Fig. 57 View Figs 50–57 ) but without humps on sternum, clypeus rim not sclerotized, few vertical hairs on tibiae, dark rings on legs more distinct. Tibia 1 in two females: 1.7, 1.9. Epigynum ( Fig. 99 View Figs 93–101 ) simple, slightly protruding plate with whitish median area; short and wide posterior plate; sclerotized arc on posterior side of genital opening. Internal genitalia ( Figs 92 View Figs 89–92 , 100–101 View Figs 93–101 ) with oval pore plates far apart, without tongue-shaped posterior membranous process and without anterior median receptacle.
Distribution
Known from type locality only, in Venezuela , Mérida (Fig. 1034).
Natural history
The spiders were brushed from mosses growing on rocks near a small forest stream.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.