Galapa Huber, 2000
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.718.1101 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F9E9A91E-488C-4DB1-9361-E788E9AC5BC1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4343949 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E887AD-FFE9-7A38-FD2A-FDE0FAA7FB61 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Galapa Huber, 2000 |
status |
|
Galapa Huber, 2000 View in CoL
Notes
The genus Galapa was established for two species endemic to the Galapagos Islands ( Huber 2000). A third species was described in 2014, also from the Galapagos Islands ( Baert 2014). The new Venezuelan species below is assigned to Galapa because it shares two specific similarities: (1) unique (among Ninetinae ) armature of the male chelicerae (processes on male cheliceral fangs but otherwise unmodified; compare Huber 2000: fig. 384 and Fig. 181 View Figs 178–182 ); (2) dorsal (in the new species below slightly prolateral) process of the procursus (compare Huber 2000: figs 383, 387 with Fig. 180 View Figs 178–182 ). In addition, the general morphology of the proximal palpal segments is similar (slender femur, large tibia), and the genital bulb of the new species below strongly resembles the bulb of G. baerti ( Gertsch & Peck, 1992) (compare Huber 2000: fig. 381 with Fig. 178 View Figs 178–182 ).
This suggests that Galapa may in fact be a widespread genus. An undescribed species from Costa Rica (Guanacaste, no precise locality data; deposited in ZFMK) may also belong in this group and thus support this view. It seems to lack a dorsal process on the procursus but shares the unique cheliceral morphology and is also otherwise very similar. A formal test of the monophyly of the genus does not exist.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.