Boconita Huber, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.718.1101 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F9E9A91E-488C-4DB1-9361-E788E9AC5BC1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4343953 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1C907EDE-66B1-4772-BEBC-BDE59A14ACA4 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:1C907EDE-66B1-4772-BEBC-BDE59A14ACA4 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Boconita Huber |
status |
gen. nov. |
Boconita Huber View in CoL gen. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:1C907EDE-66B1-4772-BEBC-BDE59A14ACA4
Type species
Boconita sayona Huber View in CoL gen. et sp. nov.
Etymology
The name is derived from the town Boconó, close to the type locality of the type species. Gender feminine.
Diagnosis
Distinguished from other Modisiminae genera by armature of male chelicerae ( Figs 32 View Figs 26–34 , 41 View Figs 35–43 ; pair of frontal processes with several short modified hairs each and pair of small frontal apophyses; similar only in Systenita Simon, 1893 ), by shape of procursus ( Figs 28 View Figs 26–34 , 37 View Figs 35–43 ; bifid distal process directed towards dorsal), by shape of genital bulb (distinctive prolateral-ventral sclerite set with small cones; arrows in Figs 30 View Figs 26–34 , 39 View Figs 35–43 ), by shape of epigynum ( Figs 44, 47 View Figs 44–49 ; wider than long), by pair of pocket-like structures in female internal genitalia (arrows in Figs 34 View Figs 26–34 , 45, 48 View Figs 44–49 ), by presence of cuticular cusps on male femora, and by male femur 3 enlarged at basis. From possibly closely related genus Systenita also by presence of AME.
Description
See species descriptions below; the two known species are very similar to each other.
Monophyly and relationships
The two included species share several distinctive and unique characters that are likely to be synapomorphies: cuticular cusps on male femora; male femur 3 enlarged at basis; genital bulb with prolateral-ventral sclerite set with small cones (arrows in Figs 30 View Figs 26–34 , 39 View Figs 35–43 ). Other similarities are shared with Systenita prasina Simon, 1893 : male cheliceral apophyses with modified hairs; epigynal plate reduced in comparison to other close relatives like Coryssocnemis Simon, 1893 and Mecolaesthus Simon, 1893 . Preliminary molecular data (J.J. Astrin, B.A. Huber, unpubl. data) support the monophyly of the genus but not the sister-group relationship with Systenita ; instead, Boconita gen. nov. is seen as sister to Coryssocnemis , and both together as sister to Systenita .
Composition and distribution
Only the two species newly described below, from the Venezuelan states Trujillo and Lara (Fig. 1033).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.