Mecolaesthus chicha Huber, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.718.1101 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F9E9A91E-488C-4DB1-9361-E788E9AC5BC1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4343835 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F0D1196A-2958-46E1-BFA7-54F38F06063C |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:F0D1196A-2958-46E1-BFA7-54F38F06063C |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Mecolaesthus chicha Huber |
status |
sp. nov. |
Mecolaesthus chicha Huber View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:F0D1196A-2958-46E1-BFA7-54F38F06063C
Figs 277–279 View Figs 277–282 , 283–290 View Figs 283–290 , 300–302 View Figs 300–305 , 1042
Diagnosis
Easily distinguished from known congeners (including the otherwise very similar M. parchita Huber sp. nov.) by armature of male chelicerae ( Fig. 289 View Figs 283–290 ; pair of pointed apophyses proximally arising from round humps and pair of blunt processes more distally) and by epigynum ( Fig. 300 View Figs 300–305 ; only median area sclerotized, widening posteriorly, not divided into two median sclerites as in M. parchita Huber sp. nov.).
From most congeners (except M. parchita Huber sp. nov.) also by two dark rings on leg femora (instead of only one or none).
Etymology
The species name refers to chicha , a Latin American beverage. In Venezuela it is made of boiled rice, milk, and sugar, has the consistency of eggnog, and contains no alcohol as it is not fermented; noun in apposition.
Type material
VENEZUELA – Mérida • ♂ holotype, ZFMK (Ar 21891), between Bailadores and Pregonero (8.1701° N, 71.8990° W), 2960 m a.s.l., forest along stream, 9 Feb. 2020 (B.A. Huber, O. Villarreal M., Q. Arias C.) GoogleMaps .
Other material examined
VENEZUELA – Mérida • 5 ♂♂, 7 ♀♀, 5 juvs, ZFMK (Ar 21892–93), and 1 ♂, 5 ♀♀, 7 juvs in pure ethanol, ZFMK (Ven20-116), same collection data as for holotype GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 2.8, carapace width 1.2. Distance PME–PME 120 µm; diameter PME 110 µm; distance PME–ALE 90 µm; diameter AME 25 µm; distance AME–AME 20 µm. Leg 1: 25.6 (6.0 +0.5 +6.1+10.8 + 2.2), tibia 2: 3.9, tibia 3: 3.0, tibia 4: 3.5; tibia 1–4 diameters: 120 µm, 130 µm, 140 µm, 135 µm; tibia 1 L/d: 51.
COLOR (in ethanol). Carapace pale gray, lateral margins and ocular area darker brown, indistinct posterior internal triangular dark mark (in live specimens with large greenish central mark; Fig. 277 View Figs 277–282 ); clypeus dark brown; sternum whitish; legs ochre-yellow, with distinct dark rings on femora (centrally and subdistally) and tibiae (subproximally and subdistally); abdomen pale greenish-gray, dorsally and laterally with dark bluish marks, ventrally with brown mark in gonopore area, light brown book lung covers, and large bluish median marks in front and behind gonopore; without dark mark above pedicel.
BODY. Habitus as in Fig. 277 View Figs 277–282 . Ocular area distinctly raised. Carapace anteriorly with distinct but shallow thoracic groove; not visibly inflated. Clypeus unmodified. Sternum wider than long (0.76/0.58). Abdomen oval, pointed at spinnerets.
CHELICERAE. As in Fig. 289 View Figs 283–290 , with pair of pointed apophyses proximally arising from round humps and pair of blunt processes more distally.
PALPS. In general similar to M. mucuy (cf. Huber 2000: figs 1028–1029) and M. tabay (cf. Figs 257–258 View Figs 257–258 ); largely indistinguishable from M. parchita Huber sp. nov.; coxa with retrolateral apophysis, trochanter with small rounded ventral process, femur proximally with large retrolateral process, distally with short obtuse ventral process (arrow in Fig. 283 View Figs 283–290 ), retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia in very distal position; procursus ( Figs 283–285 View Figs 283–290 ) at basis with bifid dorsal process, with distinct retrolateral process, simple tip partly membranous; genital bulb complex ( Figs 286–288 View Figs 283–290 ), distally mostly membranous/whitish but with distinctive distal sclerites (largely identical to M. parchita Huber sp. nov.; similar M. peckorum ).
LEGS. Without spines and curved hairs; few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia 1 at 5%; prolateral trichobothrium present on all leg tibiae; tarsus 1 with ~40 pseudosegments, mostly distinct.
Male (variation)
Tibia 1 in six males (incl. holotype): 6.1–6.3 (mean 6.2); posterior internal mark on carapace sometimes absent.
Female
In general similar to male ( Fig. 278 View Figs 277–282 ). Tibia 1 in seven females: 4.4–5.1 (mean 4.7). Epigynum ( Fig. 300 View Figs 300–305 ) slightly protruding, only median area sclerotized, laterally whitish, sclerotized area widening posteriorly; posterior plate short and wide. Internal genitalia ( Figs 290 View Figs 283–290 , 301–302 View Figs 300–305 ) with Y-shaped sclerite connected
to median posterior sclerite, pore plates tilted into almost vertical position and converging dorsally and anteriorly; with complex system of anterior folds and arcs.
Distribution
Known from type locality only, in Venezuela , Mérida (Fig. 1042).
Natural history
Most adult specimens were found close to the ground, by beating overhanging mosses growing on the rocks or overhanging masses of leaf litter near a small forest stream. They lived in small, relatively flat sheet webs with a diameter of ~ 10 cm. Juveniles were much lighter than adults ( Fig. 279 View Figs 277–282 ) and were mostly found higher in the vegetation, on trunks of tree ferns or even on the undersides of green leaves.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |