Neocarus bajacalifornicus bajacalifornicus ( Vázquez & Klompen, 2002 ), bajacalifornicus (Vazquez & Klompen, 2002

Araújo, Marcel Santos De, Palma, Antonella Di & Feres, Reinaldo José Fazzio, 2020, Catalog of the Opilioacarida (Acari: Parasitiformes), Zootaxa 4895 (3), pp. 332-356 : 341

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4895.3.2
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D2CCF661-B1C9-45A5-B344-E01C519716C5
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4361389
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E7A162-FFFA-6854-FF14-E503FE17F860
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Neocarus bajacalifornicus bajacalifornicus ( Vázquez & Klompen, 2002 )
status

Treatment

6.1. Neocarus bajacalifornicus bajacalifornicus ( Vázquez & Klompen, 2002) View in CoL *

Neocarus bajacalifornicus bajacalifornicus Bernardi et al. 2013b: 76 View in CoL

Neocarus bajacalifornicus Vázquez & Klompen 2009: 24 View in CoL (new status)

Opilioacarus (Neocarus) bajacalifornicus Vázquez & Klompen 2002: 317–318 View in CoL , figs. 1F, H, I, L, M, O, P, W, X, 2G, 3B, 4A, 5C, 6B, 7C, 10E (original description)

Holotype: F ( UNAM, OSAL000582 View Materials ). MEXICO, Baja California, Sur, Sierra de La Laguna , ex under bark downed tree, 23°28’N 109°54’W, elevation approximately 2000 m, coll. M.M. Vazquez, 20.AUG.1986, AL5951 . GoogleMaps

Paratypes: same data of holotype with exceptions, 2 F, 2 M, TN ( UQROO); M ( UNAM, OSAL00583 View Materials ), ex under bark downed Quercus devia , 13.MAR.1985, coll. M.M. Vázquez, AL 5953 ; 2 F ( UQROO), 2 F, 2M ( OSAL000584-587 View Materials ), ex under bark downed log, 1.NOV.1986, coll. M.M. Vazquez and J. G. Palacios-Vargas, AL5954 ; M ( UQROO), ex under stones, coll. B. Roth, 18.JAN.1988, AL5952 .

Distribution: Baja California Sur ( Mexico).

Etymology: This species is named after the state in Mexico, Baja California Sur, in which the material was collected.

Note: The subspecific name Neocarus bajacalifornicus bajacalifornicus was not created during the description of Neocarus bajacalifornicus chamelaensis , which should have been made (ICZN, Art. 11.4.2). It was first cited in Bernardi et al. (2013b).